![]() |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
I'd like to thank everyone who has mentioned us, team 358, as a missed pick.
Being the human player, I ran out of tetras to load in 3 of our 7 matches (we capped 7 or 8 in each of those matches) and we beat some of the better teams out there on the field as well (237 who sadly also wasn't picked, 47, and 1280 I believe just to mention a few). I couldn't watch many of the matches because I was caught up in the pits much of the time, but I can assure you that some picks on Gallileo seemed to be because of poor scouting. Perhaps many of the top 8 weren't used to having to pick? Some souting jobs were really great, though. As Pat stated, 103 had a few unlucky breaks, so they flew under the radar only to be snatched up by 16. 64 was also a great pick by 56, as they did nicely protecting that home row the whole time. Of course, I'm biased, but I think we along with many other teams just went too unnoticed by the choosing alliances on Gallileo. We stayed up all night on Friday (our head scouter got about 20 minutes of sleep) just in case if we somehow moved into a picking position. It was very disappointing to see that some of the teams that were up there in ranking the whole competition did not do the same. |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Team 549 the DevilDawgs which finished 14th in Curie was not picked. We really thought that we were going to see some action. As it was we were on standby till the finals on Einstein. We were 30 seconds from going on when 108 broke down. Oh well, there is always next year.
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
well...we have all now said that we think so and so should have been picked. but isn't this water under the bridge by this point? just saying...we should be arguing about what to do better instead of being dissapointed about the past. teams will learn from there mistakes. (trust me, we have made more than i can count) ; )
ttyl Ben TEAM 281 |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Personally, I liked 1022 in Curie. They had some strategy problems early, but once they were able to convince their partners to let them play their game, they did it effectively. They also had a conveyer belt end effector that was, as far as I know, unique.
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
I was surprised when 222 and 25 didn't get chosen. They've built amazing robots over the past couple years I've known them, and when I heard they did not get chosen, I was astonished. From what I heard from Mike on 25, they lost almost every match.
Bad alliancing usually happens, and mistakes are made. Poor scouting is always a factor as well. I would suspect that teams look at how the alliance does, not the robot itself. That's a problem I think should be fixed in team scouting plans. Look at the robot, guys, not the alliance. Big mistake. |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Since bad scouting (or rather, being in an unexpected picking position or inexperience) is the reason for much of this, perhaps FIRST should try to do something about it. Maybe they could post the overall stats of their teams on their website or maybe let each team make a statement about themselves and why they should be picked and should display it. I know it sounds wierd....but if it's a problem basically every year, FIRST should perhaps do something to help.
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Yeah, that third team in the 123:7 match was 121. I agree with Rob, it was an amazing way to start the day.
Interesting bit of info: 237 was actually at the top of the list for the 47-121 alliance to pick in the second round, but due to a mixup in the communication channels, they weren't. Oh well. :) <soapbox> We all have to remember that the point of FIRST isn't the game... it's what we learn from the game. What did you learn? I learned that sometimes you get hit in the back of the head (by a curveball, no less!) and you just have to deal with it, move on, and do the best that you can. To heck with the game... I now know what Lexan and Delrin and snaprings and PWMs are! Without FIRST, I never would've learned that. :ahh: </soapbox> Dave :cool: |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
Thank you. We tried hard, but it happens. This just motivates us to build an even stronger robot for next year. We'll see you in Ohio again next year. :cool: GO 1403!!! |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Truth be told, I was astounded that 573, 1646, and 301 went home without shots at the finals in Curie. All three were great machines under good control and deserved much better.
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
most definitely 25 (raider robotix) and 237 (t.r.i.b.e. sie-h2o bots)... to agree with heretic, the scouting in galileo was entirely lacking.
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
i think MORE teams need a copy of Kathliks championship scouting guide!!
look in whitepapers! .. with taht and a copy of the current standings, teams could start crossing others off the list, while looking at teams taht did VERY well in other regionals but bad luck in champs could be picked! we all have our bad matches |
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
7, 75, 222, 237, and 1251 should have all been picked. 237 should have been a first round pick
Quote:
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Quote:
Hi... they were right next to us in the pits. I was a little surprized we did'nt get picked either. We were 19th (5-2-0)and it was weird as team 353 which was 65th did get picked...I guess they just don't know us yet. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi