What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

What if the threaded discussion were to go away, and you could only view via the 'Linear Discussion' mode. Who would be mad? Who would be happy? Who wouldn't care?

I'm not saying it's definietly going to happen, I just want to know everybodies position.

Me? I like threaded, but most users in the linear view reply to the thread and not indivual posts within the thread, causing weird branches to spawn out of the middle (usually the bottom of the first linear page) and make threaded a game of searching the thread for little weird branches that pop out.

So, I wouldn't mind if threaded went away, just because it would make things a tad easier. I wish threaded would work, but I just don't know if it's possible to have multiple modes and make them all work independently.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

I usually use the linear mode, but I like having the option of the threaded view. (If only for the fact that it's easier to follow a branch discussion when it occurs.)

I don't know that "mad" would describe my reaction -- just frustrated (on occasion) from being hobbled. (That is until I forget that I was once able to bound, leap and hurtle as well as shuffle.)

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

I recently switched over to linear mode because of that exact "problem" with threaded. When people reply to a post, but just reply at the end of a thread it doesn't make sense.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

Me... I don't really know what you're talking about. Of course, I don't know much about this forum stuff... I just post. So.. could you maybe explain what it is you're talking about? Or how I could find what you're talking about?

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

In the upper right corner of each thread theres 'Display Modes'. Choose between the three, theres Linear (default), Threaded, and Hybrid (a combo of Threaded & Linear).

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

I'm not a big fan of threaded.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

Ohhhhhhh, now I know why there are reply buttons on each posters post and at the end of the thread. I use linear mode because I disliked threaded when CD used to be threaded. I didn't even know CD kept the threaded option.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

Yep, vBulletin 3 brought back the Threaded View.

I was actually tempted to remove the big reply button at the bottom, but figured people would just randomly click a reply button on a post, and it would get worse.

Threaded mode is nice if everybody cooperates, but that isn't the case so I'm just seeing who would be upset if it were to leave. So far thats about 20% of the voters (only about 40 registered users use it, total).

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

Hmm, I use linear so it wouldn't be a problem for me. I was aware we had a threaded mode, but didn't know what it was...

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

I use linear since that's the default and it's the one I've grown used to.

I have on occasion switched to hybrid or threaded but couldn't get used to it. I guess I don't like change. :p

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

Err, I clicked the wrong button. Subtract one vote for "I use threaded, but I don't care if it went away." and add one to "I use linear, and would care if threaded went away."

As my changed vote would imply, I'm on linear (as threaded just doesn't work with me--too much clicking). But if folks like threaded, more power to 'em.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

O wow... I just tried threaded and heh... I cannot use it... I like to read them in order. And I just realized that there were those modes up there, along with the thread tools. I should really pay more attention. Thanks.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

So how about threaded is removed, but hybrid and linear stay? That way we still have the ability to follow the branch discussions, but there is still the linear thread below it, and users can still go with linear. on it's own.

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

I always though that the big reply button was to quote the person about something. Like I just did. I can't use threaded fourms unless they clearly mark NEW for each new post and even then I don't like looking at every page of a long thread to see if there are any new posts. Maybe have it linear with a threaded outline at the bottom (just links to posts or just the title or somthing) like:
Subject
>Re:Subject
>Re:Subject
>>Re:Re:Subject
>>Re:Re:Subject
>Re:Subject

at the bottom of every page

Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
 

Now that I know what the two are, I like linear...