![]() |
What if ... [threaded vs linear]
What if the threaded discussion were to go away, and you could only view via the 'Linear Discussion' mode. Who would be mad? Who would be happy? Who wouldn't care?
I'm not saying it's definietly going to happen, I just want to know everybodies position. Me? I like threaded, but most users in the linear view reply to the thread and not indivual posts within the thread, causing weird branches to spawn out of the middle (usually the bottom of the first linear page) and make threaded a game of searching the thread for little weird branches that pop out. So, I wouldn't mind if threaded went away, just because it would make things a tad easier. I wish threaded would work, but I just don't know if it's possible to have multiple modes and make them all work independently. |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I usually use the linear mode, but I like having the option of the threaded view. (If only for the fact that it's easier to follow a branch discussion when it occurs.)
I don't know that "mad" would describe my reaction -- just frustrated (on occasion) from being hobbled. (That is until I forget that I was once able to bound, leap and hurtle as well as shuffle.) |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Me... I don't really know what you're talking about. Of course, I don't know much about this forum stuff... I just post. So.. could you maybe explain what it is you're talking about? Or how I could find what you're talking about?
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I'm not a big fan of threaded.
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Ohhhhhhh, now I know why there are reply buttons on each posters post and at the end of the thread. I use linear mode because I disliked threaded when CD used to be threaded. I didn't even know CD kept the threaded option.
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
I was actually tempted to remove the big reply button at the bottom, but figured people would just randomly click a reply button on a post, and it would get worse. Threaded mode is nice if everybody cooperates, but that isn't the case so I'm just seeing who would be upset if it were to leave. So far thats about 20% of the voters (only about 40 registered users use it, total). |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Hmm, I use linear so it wouldn't be a problem for me. I was aware we had a threaded mode, but didn't know what it was...
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I use linear since that's the default and it's the one I've grown used to.
I have on occasion switched to hybrid or threaded but couldn't get used to it. I guess I don't like change. :p |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Err, I clicked the wrong button. Subtract one vote for "I use threaded, but I don't care if it went away." and add one to "I use linear, and would care if threaded went away."
As my changed vote would imply, I'm on linear (as threaded just doesn't work with me--too much clicking). But if folks like threaded, more power to 'em. |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
O wow... I just tried threaded and heh... I cannot use it... I like to read them in order. And I just realized that there were those modes up there, along with the thread tools. I should really pay more attention. Thanks.
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
Subject >Re:Subject >Re:Subject >>Re:Re:Subject >>Re:Re:Subject >Re:Subject at the bottom of every page |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Now that I know what the two are, I like linear...
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I would use the threaded mode, but like you (Brandon), it tends to not follow the flow correctly.
I'd don't care if it goes. |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I personally like the hybrid mode, because its much easier to see who replied to what reply, and you see everything in order too!
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
i think hubred is cool.
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I always use linear mode because I'm used to it and wouldn't care much if threaded disappeared. But I can see that some people might prefer it. After all, it (theoretically) keeps more organization to the forum threads, but on the other hand, when hybridized with linear as it is, it does tend to become gobbledygook. Do as you will, Master of the Server.
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
As it is most places, people don't cooperate when using threaded and it gets sucky rather fast. I haven't used it in a while for that reason.
Wetzel |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
I found threaded to be completely confusing so I stuck with linear and I can find what i want very easially
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
|
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
Anyway .. I guess threaded is going to stay, but I was just seeing how many people actually use it purposely. There aren't that many when I query the database. I will be switching back to linear, though; threaded has gotten too crazy. |
Re: What if ... [threaded vs linear]
Quote:
I hate threaded mode. Slashdot's threaded mode is the bane of my existence. Long live linear. --Petey |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi