![]() |
Re: Construction materials
I think my personal favorite is a carbon/Kevlar composite plain weave with a heavy duty epoxy. Yes you do have to form it yourself but its actually pretty easy and not horribly expensive. The shaping is actually good because you can customize the shape of the frame without having to lose strength. Also It has a good strength to weight ratio (the exact ratio escapes me).
Also one critical thing Ive failed to see mentioned are the types of strength materials have . A materials type of strength defines its function. The Kevlar gives a great tensile strength and torsional strength. Yet the carbon gives the weave good transverse strength and amazing impact resistance. However I recommend practicing the process and familiarizing yourself with the materials. If you don't form it evenly or use the right types of epoxy and weave you will create weak points. |
Re: Construction materials
696 has used welded 6063 1/8" wall aluminum box tubing frames for the past two years. 6061 was not available. Anyway, we have had virtually no problems with the 6063 and have only cracked (very minorly, no repair needed) a weld once ever. The 6063 polishes very nicely too. :) As with any welding, be prepared for warpage and have a plan to correct it (or prevent it)
|
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
There was a thread about using it in different robot applications, about a year ago. I noted then that if you scratch something made of carbon, even cosmetically, you can cause it to catastrophically fail, with no warning like with metals that will bend. Seeing as a frame is probably going to get the hell scratched out of it, that doesn't sound too appealing to me. It's not an easy material to work with either. It can be very hazardous to your health if you don't have a good understanding of what you're doing and take safety precautions. |
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
|
Re: Construction materials
Yes, Ti is about the perfect medium between aluminum and steel, but as for frame building, not so much. The more I think about it, it would be useful for small parts though.
|
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
|
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
|
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
it's original use was on USSR ICBM's on submarines under the polar ice caps. The missiles would have their fins ripped off, so they started making them out of an alloy of scandium and aluminum, giving them the strength to punch through the ice. |
Re: Construction materials
"Scandium metal powder is combustible and presents a fire hazard."-wikipedia
haha, great, electrical fires and chemical fires! :D |
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
It's no different than magnesium--it's highly flammable when in strips/powder, but it's used for various other things in a more solid state. |
Re: Construction materials
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium cool stuff really. What would FIRST say if we told them our robot was made of magnesium (I know, I know, Its near impossible to burn the bulk stuff) Much lighter than aluminum.
|
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
*i assume since a large number of distributors and manufacturers trust them, we can too. |
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
Easton is most certainly a trustworthy company as far as quality of product goes. I don't know much about their baseball bats/hockey sticks, but their bicycling products routinely exceed their strength parameters by 3-4x. |
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
|
Re: Construction materials
Quote:
At any rate, bicycle tubing is probably fairly hard to work with. I know Scandium isn't easy at all to weld. It's also extremely cost prohibitive. A plain bicycle frame made of the stuff is around $2000+. After all is said and done, for FIRST exotic metals probably wouldn't offer much of a tangible advantage over plain aluminum when used properly. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi