![]() |
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
I'd be curious to know what the contracted rate is with MCS for the included drayage? I'm guessing it comes to about $100-$200 on average for each team. Thus that savings seems hardly worth it. Fed Ex donates shipping for most teams doing just one competition like rookies so there goes that arguement. I guess I'm not sure the ship requirement will reduce the costs for the newer, cash strapped teams. I'd still like to know what can be done to bring down the cost of this registration to below $5000. And you know what I'm getting burned out from? "Will we raise the $$ in time?", "fundraising activities", etc..
|
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
I agree with Andy's idea but think there needs to be an addendum. I think the ship date should be moved to the weekend after the final regional. Only teams attending nationals would need to ship their robot. This solution fixes the same problems Andy Baker suggested and more:
A.) Most teams would benefit from the reduced shipment rate for sending the robot across country. B.) The national competition still retains the feeling of "the olden days." Where you had to pack up your robot by a certain time and ship it. Then rush into the venue and unpack it. I think it will be quite nostalgic after the regional competition. |
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
Quote:
Ken |
Re: I rule change - no shipping the robot
Quote:
1) Is anyone that dedicated to drive cross country to play a second regional or even nationals or forget all that the main regional - we all love FIRST in many more ways then the normal person can imagine but are we willing to make that drive when FIRST has a shipping company that takes all that stress away. 2) Gas is not cheap so this goes hand in hand with no.1 I'm not stating this to knock down our support and dedication to FIRST but one thing we need to realize is that FIRST is making it so much easier asnd cheaper by having things set the way they are. Yes theres alot of pros and cons to this but when it comes to shipping your own bot all b/c it eliminates registration fees and gives the teams more time to work on the robot I say stick with the current system why b/c it works. 1) First is the cost of the Van or small truck to ship stuff to and from the events 2) gas and basic maintenance 3) insurance 4) vehicle registration this is just to purchase the vehicle in question to accomodate safe and delicate handling of the robot then you need drivers and not just one a few to help unload the stuff. It's just mind boggling to just think of what you need to take care of the job yourself Just leave the shipping date there - it creates more suspense more excitement and its the incentive that helps the teams get the job done when you can actually say shes gone after 6 long hard weeks of coutless hrs of staying awake and hitting the programmer for not getting it right the first time =) ****Edit**** OR When Signing up for registration they're should be 2 options 1) I will Ship the Robot and its tools or Accessories Myself 2) I will Ship the Robot and its tools or Accessories via FED EX If option 1 is chosen if gives the teams some lee way to build their robot but they are expected to make the right legal jugdement calls while during the build period if the team is noted as having a robot unfit for the competition option 2 gets automatically selected and must stick with the team until the team either seizes from operation or the rules change. basically they're should be no reason why your robot failes to perform during practice and game play if you were given the extra time at your own request to make sure all the weeds have been picked from a finely grown lawn. Also you must sign a waiver that states FED EX is not responsible for any damages done to your robot. But remember this You shipped your robot to the competition you are NOT allowed to all of a sudden change your mind and ship your robot through FED EX to its next regional national or school - you got it their at your own free will and you will need to move it at your own free will. If option 2 is chosen then fed - ex takes care of everything or alternative option 1 allow the teams to transport their robots themselves at there own free will only if the competition is local to them and it can't be a certain determined distance radious of where the school is at. and once again the rest of option 1 applies the team needs to get it in and out of its destination on there own free will. they may not decide to have fed ex do the transporting. the only difference to this option is that it is an open option to those who are building the robot is local to the venue so that not as much travel time is required and for those who are at a greater distance from their school to the venue must select option 2 yes things change as far as venue determination, teams will be given one week before their 1 st selected regional takes place to change their mind and how they want to ship their robot. C:\Mikespointlessrant\END RANT.DOC - last altered 10/27/05 @ 1947hrs |
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
Quote:
|
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
Quote:
First off, 330 already takes all the stuff except the robot and some other stuff that stays in the crate in a van. Howver, the Championship is just too far for us to do that. That's when we pack everything in the crate. This appies for our home regional and our other regional. Second, driving at team expense--you have to pay for gas, which I'm sure some teams can afford these days, but taking the robot clear to Atlanta for nationals is getting beyond us, and then you have getting a couple weeks off school to drive there and back, it's not worth it. Arizona, Sacramento, and SVR are pushing it already if we were to do them at team expense. And, of course, you need to coordinate driver schedules. Third: A pickup truck is not the best because you need to secure the bot. Plus you have the weather problem. A minivan can hold a robot and all its competition parts and tools, yes, but at least for us, that involves loss of seating for all except the driver and one other person. A fullsize, you could have four or five people and all the tools and the robot and the cart, but how many of us have those that don't need to take siblings along or something like that? Oh, and then there are the signs, giveaways, etc. to deal with. And how many of us build a practice bot and use it to practice packing with? Fourth: Team do it in the offseason just fine, yes. Would they be able to make it work in the regular season? Probably. The difference is that in the offseason, the competitions are more spread out. You might have one in June and not have another till October. You can take it easy. In the regular season, everything is compressed. You have schoolwork to make up, sleep to catch up on, and then you need to tweak the robot. You are in for STUDENT burnout. Oh, and I forgot to mention that some teams ship their robots anyway if they are going to, say, IRI. Woule eliminating ship date be good or bad? That comes down to what is best for your team. But if someone has a long way to go to an event, the teams that are in the same city have a huge advantage. If FIRST wants a level playing field, they will need to keep the ship date. |
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
Quote:
|
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
Quote:
You are also right about it making no sense to pay a lot just to ship the robot 50 miles and have it sit around for weeks. However, there are teams that have no competition in their state, and FIRST teams may not have enough money to pay the expenses. Under the current system, Fedex provides free shipping to one event. How many teams that barely suvive now could pay the shipping rates without them? And for some teams, there is no way to drive the robot to a competition. So there may be ways to improve that part, but they escape me. Yes, eliminating the cost of shipping would be a great savings. But when you consider that the shipping as is is already close to free (and enforces the build period), then you remove that, and substitute gas costs, do you really save? We could debate this forever, but if teams are responsible to get their own robot to competitions, I think that there will be a lot fewer teams in FIRST. How does that further the purpose of FIRST? |
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi