![]() |
Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
is anyone thinking about using a turret on their robot?
i personally don't like air power but im just wondering if anyone will be thinking about shooting with air |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
if you mean as in air pushing the ball down a barrel. i thikn its impossible. from the size of our tanks vs diameter of the ball and the 60psi regultion doesnt hlp either
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
is there anyother way to do a robot that could fire a ball |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
You'd have to check the rules to be sure, but I believe all air systems have to be closed.
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
darn what about a pitching machine if we cant use air
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
hmm that sounds like a good idea
but wouldnt the foam absorb some of the shock and keep the ball from moving as fast |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Is there not certain rules around using springs as well?
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
Think of punching the ball instead of "spitting" it out with air. I happen to agree that we don't have the air volume with the two Clippard's we are limited to. But if you use their air wisely, you just may be successful. :yikes: |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
what about using a pool cue like object at a high velocity?
that may work |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
We did rule out an air pressure design, but we did look at a different type of nerf gun similar to a softball pitcher.
http://www.bangzoomdesign.com/ripsaw.html This nerf gun has a loose barrel and the wheel puts a really nice back spin on the ball. Its very accurate for a nerf gun. |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
-dave |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
My team has been thinking about it pretty seriously, but we're a rookie team, so we don't really know what we're doing. I'm checking frantically through the manuals to make sure this is legal. I haven't found anything, but can anyone here confirm that we can do it?
The thing about 'no open systems' worries me. |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
the big issue for our team is side-loading vs bottom-loading. We are actually probably going to end up with the launching device being part of the turret with just as much movement allowed., Remember, the longer the ball stays enclosed without direct propulsion, the slower and less accurately it will go the 'no open system' refers to the covering of fast/dangetously moving parts. There have been some pics up of teams launching through two fast-moving belts and for safety reasons, the final model will need to have those belts covered from the outside. The same will go for spinning gears and wheels that could possibly come in contact with another bot. |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
But, I think your point is, if the ball has a tight seal and is restricted from moving until the pressure builds sufficiently*, then some surprising force can be generated. *Sufficient = you do the math Don |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
What I ment about no open systems, was that you cannot design the air system just to dump to the atmosphere such as an air cannon design. Now that was my belief but upon scaning the rules I found nothing to back that up. So perhaps that is not the case. Would anyone like to offer input on that?
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
At the kickoff they spent an awful lot of time talking about the softball launcher - surely they wouldn't have been misleading us would they?
Are softball launchers compatible with a tube? Would it improve accuracy or put sidespin on the ball, forcing it to hook or slice? And I know you're not Shirley. |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
So consider well your options. A spinning-wheel ball launcher is an obvious choice, but it might not be the winning one. |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Surprisingly the cannon extension will not provide as much accuracy as you may think. At least that is what we found from our prototyping.
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
You could use a spring then pull back a plate inside the turret with a winch. It would be semi simple design that would follow regulations.
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
What i have figured out, there are only 4 plausible ways of firing a ball.
1. Single wheel shot (pitching machine on kickoff video) 2. Multiple wheel shot (more advanced pitching maching, look at a batting cage) 3. Catipult 4. Pneumatic piston/spring shot (both similar in a platform pushing the ball out) |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Don't forget "Flywheel to linear transition" thrower"...
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
I'm not sure if this is what Blair was going for but this is what i'm envisioning. First place a ball on a cart like object that can carry the ball and make it travel on a short track. Then take a flywheel and bring it into contact with the cart to accelerate it. the cart should travel until it hits a stopper making it stop and any ball on it flying off. It seems like a nice compromise between a flywheel and some other sort cannon mechanism. You get consistency because you're always shooting the same cart object, but it isn't quite as fast and quickly repeatable as a straight flywheel. If you springload the cart so that it automatically comes back you wouldn't have to devote another motor the cart mechanism.
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
that still is categorized in the one wheel system, its just a small modification.
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
|
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
Quote:
also how about gravity fed trbuchet style or bow and string mangonels. crossbowish stuff. so basically simply put the list gets to be angular kinetic energy (flywheels and the such) gravitational potential energy (obvious) elastic potential energy (bows. cross bows. springs. bungees) compressed gas electrical(as in motors so i guess this is kinda angular kinetic) mind power(technically unless you need to send radio waves from your head you dont even need to have the driver do this. someone in the stands can do this.. and even shoot down opponent's shots. but maybe violates GP? i unno some sort of chemical reaction or sumthing. probably not legal |
Re: Anyone thinking NERF ball turret
that was like the post of the day for me. ahahahaha. Like Wonderboy, mind bullets. (Tenacious D reference for all you newbs)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi