![]() |
[Help] OI Modification
What is the legality of opening up the OI and, say, replacing some of the LED's with piezoelectric speakers? I'm thinking a lock-on tone (when the camera has a lock on the target at 5ft., and has aligned the launching mechanism accordingly) would be a lot better than a lock-on LED. Taking your eyes off the robot to keep checking for a lock = bad.
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Quote:
Another consideration is that the competition venues are extremely noisy and it might be very difficult to hear a buzzer or sound. |
Re: [Help] OI Modification
definatly illeagal, but also if you screw up and break your OI you void your warrenty...
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
The definitely legal way to do this: attach a portable computing device (see <R74>, <R77>, and <R78> for applicable rules) and rig it to give the sound. This is assuming you can hear the noise in an arena with loud music and cheering, of course. I'm not sure that modifying the OI in this way is legal, even if it were a good idea (which it isn't).
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
See the OI documentation available here. The LEDs are "echoed" on the PWM connectors. If you can find a beeper that works at 10 milliamps, and that you can hear over the noise at competition, go for it.
If the issue is just not wanting to look away from the field to see the indicator, you might consider a "head-up display", with one or two LEDs mounted to the corner of your operator's safety glasses and wired to a connector on your OI. |
Re: [Help] OI Modification
See the second sentence in Rule <R61>.
It has been said before, but it is worth saying again: please read ALL the rules for the game! In particular, read sections 3,4,5 and 6 carefully. The manual is chock-full of really useful information. The 2006 FRC Manual: Read it. Learn it. Know it. |
Re: [Help] OI Modification
If you're looking to do a lock-on indicator, a visual cue is much more effective field-side. Back, in 2003, 67 used a hat-mounted LED to tell the stacker operator when the stack was secured by the stack-hold-down mechanism. So, in any case it is possible, and in fact, we're probably going to do the same target-lock idea you're aiming to do this year as well.
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Ooh, I like that idea a LOT more, actually. We'd need a hella bright LED array, though. Anyone know where to get a bunch cheap blue LED's (don't say Radioshack, because I said *cheap* LED's)?
Speaking of LED's... is it legal to interfere with other teams' guidance systems (i.e. spewing lots of IR all over the field in order to mess with proximity sensors). I know it's not legal to cause physical damage, but the rulebook said nothing on this sort of defense. |
Re: [Help] OI Modification
How many portable computing devices are we allowed to bring? (I was thinking along the lines of a laptop for software reprogramming/modification, and my PDA to link to one of the serial ports to display performance data, etc.).
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Quote:
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Is that in the Game section or Robot section (dont have a rulebook handy on me at the moment).
@Edit Also, the "hella bright LED array" would not be on the OI, but rather on the robot itself (as had been suggested for a visual-cue for a lock-on, as opposed to a (however cool) lock-on tone). Is there a milliamp limit on LED`s on the robot itself? |
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Quote:
|
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Quote:
<R31> No devices or decorations are permitted on the robot that are intended to jam or interfere with the operation of the vision system (i.e. changing robot color to confuse opponent’s vision system). FLOWCHART: (Page 14, Section 5) Question 1: "Is the part a safety hazard or likely to damage robots, the field, or interfere with the humans or the controls?" ---> "YES" ---> "No! It may not be used!" Also ... Quote:
<R59> Custom Circuits may not: • Interfere with the operation of other robots • Directly alter the power pathways between the battery, fuse blocks, speed controller/relay, and motor. Custom high impedance voltage monitoring or low impedance current monitoring circuitry connected to the robot’s electrical system is acceptable, because the effect on the robot outputs should be inconsequential. • Directly affect any output devices on the robot, such as by providing power directly to a motor, supplying a PWM signal to a speed controller or supplying a control signal to a relay module • Be used for wireless communication, such as sending or receiving a signal to and/or from the alliance station • Connect to the radio or tether ports on the Robot Controller |
Re: [Help] OI Modification
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi