![]() |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Quote:
|
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
According to Google: Athlete - A person possessing the natural or acquired traits, such as strength, agility, and endurance, that are necessary for physical exercise or sports, especially those performed in competitive contexts.
Once again, one could argue that anyone is an athlete via lexicon. However, based on the widely accepted concept of an athlete, FIRSTers would not qualify. |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
so you guys never saw the competitions with the floppy pillows that had to be thrown across the field?
or the soccer balls that had to be thrown into the movable goals? or the giant dodge-balls that had to be thrown into the goals? Or the INNER TUBES! Ever try to play ring-toss with an inner tube from 30 feet out? |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Quote:
so does that make it a sport |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Though I don't know of those particular games, I would assume that those were human player tasks. Therefore, I assume that you're implying that the human players are athletes, and therefore FIRST is a sport. I'd like to direct you back to my statements about lexicon, and how almost any activity can fit the definition of "sport" and any person fit the definition of "athlete." I stand by the fact that based on the socially accepted definitions of "sport" and "athlete" FIRST would not qualify. It's really simple, just go out and ask people if they believe a robotics competition is a sport. I strongly believe that you will find that very few consider FIRST, and any other competition like it, a sport.
|
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Quote:
According to Google: Athlete - A person possessing the natural or acquired traits, such as strength, agility, and endurance, that are necessary for physical exercise or sports, especially those performed in competitive contexts Yes, you are right. To add: The countless hours of skill and hard work it takes to design and build a robot for a competition. The hours of driver practice and skill it takes to COMPETE. The STRATEGY required to win matches. FIRST applies the same concepts sports does - persistence, practice, skill, competence, adaptability, commitment, intelligence, talent, precision, creativity, dedication. There is also Fantasy FIRST. If FIRST was not a sport why would Fantasy FIRST exist? Why do we celebrate when we win competitions and matches? When we win other awards? I am thoroughly convinced FIRST is a sport. Convince me otherwise. |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
1 Attachment(s)
THis is an issue which i have brought up with my school administration. While i personally believe FIRST is a sport, my school apparently does not :mad: . Here is a copy of the letter i sent to my principal on this topic and also on varsity letters.
|
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Yeah, it's a sport. Don't know if the schools count it, but you know, that saves us fees...
|
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
I would have to say, for a pep rally meant to introduce all the 2006 sports teams and having our robot be the first thing to make an appearance, I would have to consider FIRST to be a sport...
or at least the people who come up with our pep rallies think it is... |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
I found a unique website that has a sort of a scoring system to determine if something is a "sport" or not. I am in no way saying this is official or that I agree with it completely, but it seems to be pretty well made. the website can be found here .
*note, this is my numbers I am putting in here, if you disagree, that is fine, this is only what I think Physical Exertion (30 pts) Conditioning Factor: 2 Toll Factor: 0 Lifespan factor: 2 Injury Factor: 0 Who or what factor:1 Total 4 Skill (30 pts) Practice Factor: 4 Athlete Factor: 3 Body type Factor: 5 Equipment Mastery Factor: 6 Equipment Contribution Factor: 0 total: 17 Rules (10 pts) Determining the winner: 10 Total: 10 Competition (30 pts) Physical Contact Factor: 0 Offense/Defense Factor: 6 Interaction Factor: 0 Environment Factor: 2 Head to Head factor: 6 Total: 14 TOTAL: 46 The website states that anything greater than 75 is a sport, so by this definition, FIRST would not be considered a sport. I would have to agree that FIRST is not a sport just in the fact that the primary competitor is not moving the entire time, less the small amount to move joysticks. Personally, I think that anything where the main competitor barely moves by his own power should not be considered a sport. This quickly eliminates NASCAR, horseback riding, and sadly FIRST. after all of this, I really don't think it matters if FIRST is a "sport" or not, after all, "sport" is just a name, and does not change anything about FIRST. sorry for the long post, but just my $02 |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
you are only rating FIRST from the human perspective
what about the robot? clearly the games ARE a robot sport, when you rate physical contact, harm and injury, strength (a robot pulling 120A from a 12 volt battery is expending 1440 watts (1.93HP) - which is about equal to the power output of six 18 year old male athletes.) from the robots perspective FIRST is absolutely a sport. Compare what our robots do vs something like a Roomba, or the Mars Rovers! If FIRST is not a sport, then what is it?! |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Quote:
|
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
If POKER is a sport, FIRST is most definitly a sport. They should show Regionals and Nationals on ESPN... haha. Id be even more addicted to ESPN if they did!
|
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
in reply to the above..... here are my numbers :D
Physical Exertion (30 pts) Conditioning Factor: 2 Toll Factor: 0 Lifespan factor: 2 Injury Factor: 10 Who or what factor:1 Total 14 Skill (30 pts) Practice Factor: 4 Athlete Factor: 3 Body type Factor: 5 Equipment Mastery Factor: 6 Equipment Contribution Factor: 0 total: 17 Rules (10 pts) Determining the winner: 10 Total: 10 Competition (30 pts) Physical Contact Factor: 10 Offense/Defense Factor: 6 Interaction Factor: 2 Environment Factor: 2 Head to Head factor: 6 Total: 26 TOTAL: 77 77.....which is over 75. ive seen robot to person contact at competition and ive also seen injuries....so thats my pov |
Re: Is FIRST a Sport
Quote:
It seems to me that most of you want to classify FIRST as a sport to add some sort of value to it, to qualify it, or something, but that's not needed. Remember what Dean said at kickoff? FIRST borrows from sports, but it's something different, something better. "It’s not an accident we are built on the sport’s model, but there’s a big difference, it’s an important difference." Classifying FIRST as a sport similar to baseball, basketball, etc, detracts from what makes FIRST special. By doing this you also detract from the athletes who choose to play those sports, because you're saying that you are equal even though the most you do in competition is move a joystick or throw a ball. This isn't saying anything bad about FIRST, but claiming that you are equal to a marathon runner is just as much of an insult to them as it would be for them to say "Your robot is nothing, I could build that easier, and better," to you. FIRST borrows from sports, but builds upon them to make something better. They're two completely different animals, just with similar characteristics. Edit: An afterthought... I still challenge you to ask people if robotics/FIRST is a sport, and see what they say. I imagine most will either ask "What's FIRST?" or say "No" |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi