![]() |
Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
I am watching the VCU Regional webcast and see the picking of teams for eliminations. I watch the teams pick teams from ranking #1-8. Then the team ranked 8th picks a second team. The picking then goes back wards from ranking #7-1.
My question is this. Does this system of picking actually give the higher ranked teams an advantage of picking better teams? Isn't that the whole concept of having rankings? I do not see how this system gives the higher ranked teams, but I could be wrong. Anyone with an explanation please post. |
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
It does, in some sense, hurt the #1 seed. But, it was done to try to level the playing field. See this link, and the subsequent discussion.
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
It is different than in previous years, but there still is a distinct advantage having the top first round picks. This way there is an advantage to seeding higher, but not as large as it used to be.
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
I also have noticed that not many teams in the lower ranks have been prepared. like rank 7 and on.
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Yes a great example of the would be VCU. toward the end of the first round teams repeatedly picked teams who weren't at the competition or who were already picked. All of that would be solved if they would pay attention and cross out those that have already been picked.
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
Tomasz Bania |
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
i admit there are some advantages and disadvantages to this system. the advantage is that it makes the elimination rounds more action packed but it makes it seem that being higher ranked does not have all the advantages it use to.
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
Overall, this should be a warning to top seeded teams. You have to take a hard look at those teams who are left, and don't assume that a team is gone just because they are ranked well. |
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
ok although I have only been to 2 regionals (midwest/lonestar in 2004) I can say that unless your in the top 8 your only as good as other people think you are. what I mean by this is you can be high in the seedings but if other people arnt looking at you it doesnt mater. bottem line get people to look at you and remember your number(watch LSR this year and youll see a great way to get your number out there ;P )
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
At the Granite Sate regional in New Hampshire today, there were a lot of lower seeded matches upsetting the higher seeds. The number 1, 3 and 4th place alliances were eliminated in the quarterfinals, and the number 2 alliance was eliminated in the semifinals. However, I'm not sure this has to do with the new way of selecting alliances, it is still interesting to see how everything is evenly matched.
|
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
There were also some high seeded teams at the NH regional today who were not picked too... |
Re: Picking Teams in Elimination Rounds
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi