![]() |
pic: GTR Ladder
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
how about the rankings and all that stuff that online hasn't updated yet?
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
I do not know why they are not correct but I will inquire.
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
Quote:
Convoluted? Yes, very. |
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
Meanwhile see elimination pairings and results and Saturday Awards.
Also from my notes the top 32 seeds were as follows: 1114, 378, 1680, 229, 703, 296, 49, 1241, 1547, 1353, 1281, 65, 217, 1503, 1219, 610, 843, 771, 63, 1419, 1620, 48, 1009, 854, 907, 1246, 1564, 849, 1006, 1305, 919, 45, ... |
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
how about rankings. and w-l-t.
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
Quote:
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
Quote:
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
I could have sworn that I had the correct standings data on my laptop, since it was used as the Sundial server at the GTR, but it seems to have reverted to the same data from halfway through the qualification rounds that the pit display was erroneously showing Saturday at one point. Sorry.
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
we were 8-3
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
1281 was 8-2, and everyone above them was that or better. Nobody was unbeaten. I think the 9-1/8-2 transition came at about 4th or 5th place.
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
Quote:
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
do you know what your ranking points were?
|
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
Well our ranking points were around 16.8 if i remember correctly.
Our qualification points (w/l/t) was at 18. |
Re: pic: GTR Ladder
if we would have won the last match against 1114, we would have been 6th then. we had around like 13 qps or something like that.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi