Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer
 

Interesting & good job. I have a couple of small questions:

Why should the average scale score at each regional be zero? It seems that this would penalize teams that attended stronger regionals when comparing scores across regionals.

Also, did you try scaling the scores once over the entire season, i.e. treating the entire FIRST season as one regional and scaling the scores based on that? (I realize there are plenty of reasons for not doing this).

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer
 

you are my hero. amazing job!

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer
 

Revision 3:

Lil' Lavery fixed the event history section for St. Louis, SoCal, and Peachtree.

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer
 

Hey Tom,

I don't mean to ask for more work from you, you did an awesome job already, but is there any way for you to make a sheet with the teams ranked in divisions based on highest scaled score?

If not, its no biggy,

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer
 

Are you going to do a 2007 analyzer?

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer
 

Probably. It depends on the match data that FIRST archives. Without a good sample size, the data is worthless.