Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

We don't need to put more teams in the playoffs. We need to give teams more qualification matches so that the teams that actually belong in the eliminations are alliance captains.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

I agree with Cory. Too many times, I've seen deserving teams not get to play in the eliminations because they had bad alliance partners, or just plain bad luck in a match or two, and that hurt their ranking. On the same note, I've also seen some teams that may not have belonged there that were seeded or picked because they had a couple of high-scoring matches with awesome alliance partners. Playing more qualifying matches would reduce the "random luck factor" in determining seeding.

How to do this is anyone's guess, but I do know in 2001, they increased the number of matches played by running additional ones on Einstein. Perhaps with a new radio system, FIRST could bring this setup, which could potentially increase qualifying matches by 25%. Of course, this poses a problem with FLL and Vex also being present, but I'm sure things could be shuffled around to allow for a 5th field somewhere.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

Just as a note, the field issue is just with FLL. FVC has had their own field (DaVinci) since its inception.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

I know. However, the FVC field takes up space, of which there is a limited amount on the stadium floor. Adding another FRC field, or moving FLL off of Einstein would require rethinking the layout for FLL, FVC, and FRC.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

Dave- thanks for the info - that makes sense.
Adding another field, if you could eliminate the crosstalk would not be too difficult - and actually you may be able to have eight fields in the space on the floor of da dome. But now I am dreaming. With 80 teams per division you are just limited on how many matches you can have. Regardless of good or bad it would be nice to let each team be able to participate in more matches. The orginal idea posted is not bad either - have a four hour work period Wed. night and a 4 hour period Thursday morning then start the matches. One thing I really like though is the unpacking the night before with less congestion - this has been one of the best things done to date, (I still remember the fiasco of the first year at Atlanta). Maybe a 6 person crew to unpack and have a 4 hour work period. 6 until 10. Maybe add two extra practice fields in the pits and eliminate the practice rounds on Thursday, although they use those to troubleshoot the fields also.
Oh well everyone have a great day!

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

Perhaps I am just dreaming, but I seem to remember in 1999 or 2002 we played one qualifying match on Thurdsay night, after 5:30 or 6:00...then 4 on Friday, then one on Saturday morning. How that was done, I have no idea. We needed until Friday morning this year to get reinspected due to a misunderstanding, and I know there was a line on Friday morning too.

One thing about the layout - if the fields are rotated a bit so that they face the corners of the dome instead of the long seating areas, that would free up more space in the middle of the dome. I bet you could have FVC and FLL next to each other on one side and Einstein still on the other side. You don't lose any seating by facing the corner, except a little bit where the entraces to the floor are, but you get almost a seating in the round effect as well.

Kev

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

The only problem with that idea is that FVC and FLL are ran simultaneously on Thursday and Friday. It would be quite confusing to have two different games being played in the same area, especially when you have different announcers for the different competitions. That is why they are played on fields on fields opposite on another.

Rather than people finding ways to try to cram another field into an ever crowded (in an electronic "noise" sense) GA Dome, why not just extend the Championships by a day? Travel costs would surely rise, but if you really want more matches, without additional fields, this is what you would need. But at some point we will realize that because of the nature of the games we play, we will reach the limits of how many matches can be crammed into the Championship Event.

What FIRST should really do is to find a way to use the excitement and energy of the Championshiops to their advantage. If the Georgia Dome can hold 70,000 people, and if only 30,000 people attended the Championships each year, why not open the other 40,000 seats up to the general public? And while they are at it, what if FIRST charged only a dollar for admission for everyone in the general public to help cover some of the costs of the event? (FIRST teams would recieve free, unlimited admisison vouchers for their team members, have special entrances to avoid lines, and be reserved priority seating sections in the arena.)

Although it might be a little costly, a few 30-second TV commercials in the greater Atlanta region in the weeks prior to the Championships with all kinds of action-packed video clips from FIRST advertising the event would help bring people in. If 20,000 spectators from the general public attend the Championships, and if 1 in 20 guests from the general public goes out and starts a team, (FRC, FVC, or FLL) voila! You now have 1,000 new FIRST teams! :yikes:

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

I think the competition is already open to the general public, but the interest doesn't exist. Part of the problem is, as you said, lack of interest. I think it would be cool if schools took field trips to go see the competition.

I think to an extent part of the problem is that spectating can be kind of tedious. I get bored at other regionals I go to, and often get up to walk around and find people I know to talk to. It would be cool if there were other things to do than simply watch the competition. At Boston, there were tables set up from several sponsor companies, and the tables set up at nationals were good too. That way, people going have something to do besides simply sit and watch.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

I remember seeing quite a few school buses filled with middle school aged students at Palmetto. They actually didn't seem really interested sitting in the stands just watching the matches though. I'm not sure if they even knew the purpose of the game, or what was going on there. But the resources are there to educate the general public, just no one knows about them.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

I've never been to the Toronto regional, so I'm not sure how it works but I was under the impression that only one of the two fields was in use at a time. The other was being reset while one was running a match.

I don't know if there's enough room on the dome floor, or if FIRST even has enough fields, but could each division be allocated two fields right next to each other?

Teams would get more matches because reset time would be reduced, and no radio upgrades would be required. Also, it wouldn't require as many volunteers as eight seperate fields (though more than four single I suppose).

~Allison

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

So your trying to tell us that IFI is adding the bluetooth radios ehh? Sounds like it will work with the additional fields good.

Re: Suggestion for 2007 Championships
 

AFAIK, FIRST does not have enough entire fields to provide each division with two fields.

Since FIRST only has eight fields to work with, there are the Archimedes, Curie, Einstein, Galileo, and Newton fields, in addition to the two practice fields in the pits. That totals seven fields, which leaves one field to cannibalize backup parts off of. Providing two fields for each division would mean FIRST would have to build four additional fields, and with each additional field costing in the five-digit range, that would be an expensive endeavor.