![]() |
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
WOW!!
and i also thought that was you annoucing when Paul hit the field. :P must just eb the canadian accent. ;) |
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
QF2-4 was one of the best matches I've seen this year. Nice balance of offense and defense, very strategic endgame. Well played by both sides.
Edit: Huh? I guess while those of us in webcast land were watching the sponsors, there must have been quite a discussion to reconcile the FMS to the actual final rack configuration. Anyone got a more complete explanation? It appears the refs spent some extra effort to get this right. |
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
WOW! after rescoring that match not once, but TWICE. The blue alliance advances to the semi's! Great job by 188 1592 and 1334. congrats to 1503 1680 and 2166 for pulling that off and moving on.
I just realized, this will be a great set of semi's, 1114, 2056, 1503, 1680, AND 2166 are all NiagaraFIRST teams! |
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Was there penelties?? i thought i saw a bot on 188's ramps at the end.
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Good lord, 1114 is fast!
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
no. there were no penalties, but the robot was only lifted enough for the 15 point bonus, 1680, 1503, and 2166 had enough ringers to pull out the win by 1 point. the placing of that spoiler definitely made the winning decision
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
The #1 alliance is unstoppable 2 matches in a row with a row of 5 and a row of 6! WOW!
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
1334 was indeed ontop of 188 but apparently part of their robot was hanging off 188's platform since they only received 15 points. The initial scoring showed that red still had enough points to win. However, upon second/third/fourth look, the layout of the rack that the refs initially scored was deemed to be incorrect. The result was that blue won 28 to 27. I made a couple assumptions, but that seems to be roughly what happened. Edit: The refs should be acknowledged for taking the time to make sure all the scoring was absolutely correct. No doubt they may have been tempted to just stick with the initial decision and keep everything going, but they took the time to ensure the correct result. |
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
The #1 alliance has put on the best show I've seen at a regional so far (I've attended NJ, Pittsburgh, and NYC and have watched a little of Boston and most of Waterloo on webcast). They built excellent bots and have defeated really good alliances (such as the twins' alliance). Congratulations to all of the Waterloo teams for putting on such an exciting and high-scoring regional. These elims have had it all - winning by tubes, winning by ramps, ties, spoilers, de-scoring, defense, penalties - very exciting! And the finals promises to be just as exciting with 2 such high-scoring alliances facing off!
|
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
1 - 1114 2056 771 vs. 2 - 854 1305 1006
Winner of first final match. |
Re: 2007 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi