![]() |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Quote:
And on the topic of Close Encounters, my friend Nikki just got those 5 tones for her text message ringtone. |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
I have a lot of thoughts that needed to be spewed out. Some of them are:
1) If there was a banana in the old hint the first thing I thought of was slipping. Maybe if there were circular platforms may they make it so it's hard to get on top? 2) With the new clue, I see the faces that looks like a crowd... I see a fish at the bottom right. But is it just me or is there a face in the bottom left hand corner? Looks like 2 eyes an open mouth a hat and a bearded sillohuette. Looks like something from a cartoon. Please tell me I'm not the only one that sees it. These are just some thoughts right now, I will post if I have any other things on my mind. Hope this brings up good conversation! |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
I agree that this may be an update, probably to sharpen certain things that hadn't popped out earlier. If so, there is the possibility that they would change other things as well, hiding a message in the picture. I would bet that they might use steganograpy (credit goes to Mazin). All of the links to the old picture are low, so if someone is sure that they have the original, please post it. That way we have both of them here to compare...
|
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Guys...we have recieved an updated clue...
look at the update date..January 2nd... The new one shows a few more things that i have noticed... there are 2 crowds: top left and center right' as people have already mentioned AND..i have got a pruff that robots WILL NOT be stationary... loo at the top right cornet, there's a wheel there...that sais it all that object that looks like a wheel in the upper right corner also looks like an alien face, with a hood on it if you look at it. Sorry guys but im just talking out of my a$$! |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Hmmm... My friend and I just looked at the old picture and the new picture... And it seems to be the same, I can see all of the things before... Or are we looking at the wrong picture?
|
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Quote:
I have noticed that the diamond plate disc is reflecting red and blue light. |
Re: Serious the Real hint
I think Joe DiMaggio, or "the Yankee Clipper", was number five for the Yankees. But what does that have to do with anything?
|
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
All I have to say is "Speed Racer"???:D :D :D
So maby the game has to deal a lot with speedness in the game? |
Re: Serious the Real hint
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Have they came out with the list of what etquitment we need to build the feild.
they usually release that information the week of kickoff |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Hi,
Our team thinks we have an idea: The five looks like it is from POOL ball. The backround looks like water: Maybe a POOL as a clue for POOL balls? Anyway, just an idea. :) |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Quote:
[EDIT] Bill of Materials This season, each team's decision regarding building field mockups may be a bit more complex than normal. The Game Design Committee feels that an advance Bill of Materials (BOM) list might be misleading and cause some teams to buy more materials than they will likely use. Please wait for a full set of field drawings and their lower cost equivalents to be released immediately following Kickoff. Knowing the nature of this year's challenge, you can more logically decide what to buy and build. See you at Kickoff! [/EDIT] |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
My final guess. :] |
Re: 2007 Official FRC Game Hint / Email Blast
Thanks for posting the original image. I used the Digital Invisible Ink Toolkit, located at http://diit.sourceforge.net/index.html. When comparing both smaller images, I found them to be identical. I have a little too much time on my hands... so I decided to keep experimenting...
I wanted to see what kind of difference encrypting "AIM HIGH" in the picture would make. When I did this I had these results: Results of benchmark tests ========================== Average Absolute Difference: 4.6866898009652585E-4 Mean Squared Error: 6.082725060827251E-4 LpNorm: 3.0413625304136254E-4 Laplacian Mean Squared Error: 4.206612200901864E-6 Signal to Noise Ratio: 1.3982824224590164E8 Peak Signal to Noise Ratio: 5.85936396E8 Normalised Cross-Correlation: 0.9999989969072935 Correlation Quality: 126.60633961495463 This shows that the software is capable of finding very small changes in the image... and I decided to make one more attempt. I took the new high quality image, and resized it to match the one they released earlier, as the program requires the images to be the same size. Upon comparison, I had there results: Results of benchmark tests ========================== Average Absolute Difference: 15.601511706752822 Mean Squared Error: 756.6327031231303 LpNorm: 378.31635156156517 Laplacian Mean Squared Error: 2.111745474975075 Signal to Noise Ratio: 112.4107839655667 Peak Signal to Noise Ratio: 471.0462533919842 Normalised Cross-Correlation: 0.9982814866037124 Correlation Quality: 126.38889170404684 If you look at the Average Absolute Difference, this, along with most of the other values, is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE greater than my "AIM HIGH" test. Now, I can't guarantee that my method of resizing the large image would match the method the GDC did, which would cause these differences. Also, if they chose to make 'minor adjustments' to the actual content of the image, that would create this kind of difference in the photo. I think that differences seen here are very high for a simple text message - it would have to be over 1000 characters long. Regardless, I can tell you that small image and the large image are subtley different. Whether there was some touch-up going on, or if there is a message hidden in the background, I am unable to tell, but they are clearly different at some level. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi