![]() |
MK 12 volt battery question
They said that we could ONLY use the MK 12 volt battery as our maing power battery, aren't they the same as last years batteries? the previous years batteries are 12 volt, can we still use them?
anyone know? -Thanks |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
The batteries are slightly different from those last year. I'm not sure of exact specs. You are not aloud to use batteries from last year as this would create an unfair advantage to those teams who dont have those batteries from last year
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
-John *I do not know the exact model number off hand. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Specs for the 2007 battery are here.
Specs for the 2006 battery are here. The new one appears to have about 10% less stated capacity at 1C discharge rate. So if you could use the older battery you might get an advantage over a team using the new one -- which is almost certainly the reason why the older ones are not allowed this year. For more, see this post. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
Sadly there's nothing we can do about that. Might as well learn to deal with it. Big disappointment but oh well. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Not every team is going to be in a match at the same time. We do know how to share.:D
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
I speak from experience by the way. 57 takes just 3 batteries anywhere we travel and we don't have any problems. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
If that is FIRST's intention, I don't think it could be enforced. (How would FIRST know if a team brought more than two batteries to the regional?)
That said, I wonder if that is a mistake in the manual. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
That rule was the same last year as well. You will be able to buy more of the same battery and use them, as long as they are the same as the ones in the KOP.
Expect a clarification in the Q&A or a Team Update. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
I would interpret this:
Quote:
-Nate |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Agreed. R46 covers what you can use ON the robot at any time. No using 2 batteries at once, no using a different battery on the robot. Doesn't cover what you can have at the comp. So I would expect some Q&As but no updates on that.
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Don't know if anyone has noticed this, but the new batteries seem a bit heavier as well. We pulled out the scale today and clocked them at about 13.5lbs, which is about 1.5 lbs more than the old batteries (someone correct me if I'm wrong that the old ones weighed 12lbs)
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
There are some major differences between the two sections of spec sheets you posted. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
The old exides list approx 13.44 lbs while the new MKs list 13.82 lbs I'm more concerned about the max current draw - like Karthik said, if the draw is that much different than it will definitely have an impact on robot performance and capabilities |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Karthik,
The specifications on the MK site are very close to the specifications for the old battery. The differences are slight enough to merely be differences in testing methods or the influence of the marketing departments. A close inspection of the discharge curves show that they are at slightly different currents from the batteries we have used in the past. A quick interpolation of the data would show them to be almost identical. Let's face it, a battery of the same physical size and chemistry with the same amp hour rating is going to be pretty close in performance. You can only pack so much lead and acid into that package. I hate to have to buy new batteries this year but if those are the rules then so be it. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
As I am reading this chart it seems the new battery has a HIGHER discharge rate. 5 seconds @ 720A this years battery and last years battery is 5 seconds @ 230A. Therefore it would better seem the new battery is BETTER for burst and a quick pushing match...
-Mike |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Mike,
Although that specification looks different, last year's battery was capable of the same high current for short periods and when new and fully charged. "Your mileage will vary." In fact most teams will not be able to draw this kind of current simply because there are other limiting factors like the combined resistance of the wiring, breakers, speed controllers and connectors. Remember that the real test will be how much you can draw over a two+ minute match and remain above 8 volts, the critical cutout for the RC. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Reading the label on the battery, this years battery is 18AH instead of last years 17AH.
The R46 rule says the use of batteries different from or in addition to the ones provided, nothing about more then one on a robot. This can be read as the ones given in the KOP are the only ones to be used on the field. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
First of all, last year's battery was an Exide ES 18-12 (or the EX 18-12, in some cases), which is the same battery that we have used for many years, and it is indeed an 18AH battery. Many people have linked to the datasheet for this, so you can confirm there.
Also, as stated before, <R53> clearly states that we CAN purchase additional MK batteries for use during the competition. <R46> states that you can not use more than one battery on the robot during a match. -Nate |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Thanks for listing the specs for the 2007 battery
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Thank you, there are many conflects in the rules.
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
It appears that the new batteries should not have a great effect on teams. MOE only uses the new batteries in competitions any way, and the old ones are perfectly legal for practice. As always, we're always willing to share with other teams, just let us know you need them:)
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
1 Attachment(s)
The 10% difference sited on old vs new battery may or may not exist. The old battery specs its 9Ah at 0C/32F. The new battery specs its 8.1Ah at 25C. Specmanship in play as the temperature of the measurement is important.
The old battery lists 9AH with a 18A (1C) draw at 0C/32F temperature. It also has a curve for 20C/68F which shows roughly something like ~7.5Ah-8Ah (hard to get exact with the log graph shown but looks like 24+/-2 minutes until 100% depth of discharge (DoD) is reached). The new battery lists 8.1Ah with 18A (1C) draw at 25C, about 27 minutes to 100% DoD. The actual discharge graph only shows a 17A discharge curve, but it too looks to be in the 28 minute range to 100% DoD. http://www.rpci-inc.com/pdf/ES17-12.pdf I overlaid the discharge curves between old/new. The 17A/18A are green/red curves. What is more interesting are the 36A (old) vs 34A (new) curves. The 36A (old) curve shows 100% DoD at about 16-18 minutes vs 34A (new) curve shows 100% DoD at about 9-10 minutes. The voltage drop under load favors the new battery which maintains a much higher voltage output under similar load. This was confirmed by a quickie test using a 50A dummy load on last year's ES18-12 vs this year's ES17-12. The ES17 had a ~.2-.3v higher voltage while under load. Load was held for 20-30 seconds. The batteries are close, but are different and diverge at larger discharge rates. The biggest difference seems to be the maximum spec'd discharge; 230A (old) vs 720A (new). Greater safety margin? Bud |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
As an Israeli team we dont have a local seller of hose batteries..
What are we supposed to doif we want more of them? |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
I think these people will ship to Israel.
http://www.economybatteries.com http://www.economybatteries.com/qsea...eld.y=0&bhcp=1 Order the ES17-12, not the ES17-12AP Ed |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
From MK's website ..
http://www.mkbattery.com/images/ES17-12.pdf Looks like the 720A discharge wins. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Thanks Bud for overlaying the graphs. It shows pretty conclusively that the differences between the batteries lies mostly in the method used to test. Let's not get hung up on the max current spec. The real difference between the batteries is the internal resistance, 11mohm for the old battery and 10mohm for the new. Hang a dead short on the output terminals (please don't do this) and Ohm's Law tells you...12/.011 vs. 12/.010=1099 vs. 1200. Throw in some safety margin so you don't cause the battery to explode and you get down to the 720 amps max discharge for a new, fully charged battery, no matter the manufacturer.
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
<R53> The only legal main source of electrical energy on the ROBOT during the competition is the
12VDC non-spillable lead acid battery provided in the 2007 Kit Of Parts. That 12V battery is the MK Battery, ES17-12. Additional batteries may be purchased through a local MK Battery supplier. Teams may use other equivalent 12V batteries during development, testing and practice matches. However, during the qualifier and elimination matches, only the MK Battery, ES17-12 can be used (this means NO pre-2007 batteries can be used during qualification and elimination matches at any official 2007 FIRST competition). The batteries from past years can be used, but not in qualifying or elimination rounds. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Forgive me if this have been mentioned already but could I make a suggestion for all you veteran teams? Find a rookie team nearby and offer them two of your old Exide batteries. I'm sure they'll all appreciate having the extra batteries for testing and practice. Go to usfirst.org to find the rookie teams nearest you!
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Thanks guys for helping.
I needed to know quick so we oculd get a few more ^_^ |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
from this source. To cause even more confusion on the battery situation, the kit batteries were grey and these batteries are black. The model number on the kit batteries is ES17-12, with the printed (on the battery) amp hour rating being 18 ah at the 20 hour rate. The model number on the batteries we got from this source is also ES17-12, with the printed amp hour rating being 17 ah at the 20 hour rate. This is consistent with the amp hour rating in the specification chart for the ES17-12AP battery, but the battery we ordered, and the model number printed on the battery we received, is ES17-12. All I care about at this point is passing inspection! Eugene |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
For anyone concerned about disposing old worn out FRC batteries please read the first notice in TEAM UPDATE #1 for more information about disposal.
Ed |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
I didn't find your lower cost source before ordering from here: http://www.batteriesasap.com/659.html. Arrived within 2 days, shipped from Illinois. The batteries are the same grey color included in the kit and have a date code of 060928 stamped into the top, which I would guess means they were manufactured Sept. 28th, 2006. They arrived with terminal voltages of 12.78 and 12.76 volts and didn't take much of an equalizing charge. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
Gene, Inspectors ran into this problem last year if you remember. The various suppliers make batteries stamped with the same part # but as I remember the black ones were not allowed for competition. It would seem that First needs to address this issue NOW. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
Very slow. Quote:
Oh, and don't forget that if you don't keep track of them, you might not get them back. If I'm not mistaken, 675 might have accidentally taken other teams' tools without knowing it last year (and if we did, sorry, and please confront one of us, preferably me, and notify us). |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
One very nice thing about this year's battery is the battery is labelled with:
Not restricted for passenger or cargo aircraft. Meets air transportation requirements under title 49 CFR173.159 and special provision A67 as decreed by IATA and ICAO. In prior years we had a tough time dealing with some airlines and shippers. They were reluctant to ship the Exide batteries because there was no documentation proving that the batteries met the vibration, differential pressure tests, etc. required under CFR179.159. This year's battery should "fly" through the season without any problems. P.S. I found the response to FRC845's post in the Q&A Forum less than definitive: Batteries <R46> MK Batteries told the member from FRC845 that batteries ES17-12 12V-18AH/20HR and ES17-12 12V-17AH/20HR are the same. Does FIRST concur with this statement or not?? |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
I asked that question on the Q&A's this morning. Let's let the GDC see if they can clarify. Basically I asked if inspectors are to go by part number or specs and if by specs how can we be sure of getting the right battery as the company seems to ship two different amp/hour but the same part number.
Watch the Q&A's for answer. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
hey all.i been looking all over,but i cant find where to buy a 12v 18ah mk-battery, if any of u guys would be so kind to email me a link to a good supplier, cheap would help, i would be very appreciative, my email is fortyniner_fan056@yahoo.com
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
Agree? |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
Quote:
|
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
As a reminder to all teams...
Make your inspectors and refs happy by NOT painting your batteries. |
Re: MK 12 volt battery question
How are the batteries holding up?
How many batteries does it take to get through a regional? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi