Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Ramp Angle Survey (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51329)

SkiMasterATV 09-01-2007 00:23

Ramp Angle Survey
 
I am a member of a rookie team, and we are just curious about the approach angle of the ramps that are being built out there. Supposedly 60% of the teams polled in a recent survey said that they would be allowing both alliance partners to get on to them for 30 points apiece.

The poll is found here

If so many people are focusing on ramp construction, and if you will have one, we are just curious as to what your floor-ramp angle will be, and what set of points are you going for...

The hope is that an average approach angle can be achieved and be used in the planning of our design.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

-Bryan/2046

Brad Voracek 09-01-2007 00:30

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
We were thinking of around a 19 degree ramp... Using the four foot weight class this is about the smallest angle we can achieve reasonably. I really think it will be easy for robots to get on our ramp though, using material with nice traction... And a couple other things ;p

Guy Davidson 09-01-2007 00:42

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
Our potential ramp (which we were thinking about scrapping) would have angle of about 20%.

Swan217 09-01-2007 00:43

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
It's reasonable to assume that most robots this year with have a higher CG than last year. About half last year didn't even try to go up the 30 degree ramp. With this in mind, 15(ish) degrees should be the maximum to accomidate most robot designs. Any higher, and you'll have a lot of flipping.

GaryVoshol 09-01-2007 09:19

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Swando (Post 551871)
It's reasonable to assume that most robots this year with have a higher CG than last year.

How do you figger, Dan? This year's robots won't have a heavy shooter up on top. (OK, some robots had their shooter mounted low, but most were high.) I presume whatever ring-handling mechanism you have will be less massive than a shooter, could be folded up into its starting configuration when going up a ramp.

I'm not saying it's a trivial matter. I just think it will be easier this year, as long as you plan ahead. There's heavy stuff you need (battery, drivetrain, [optional] pneumatics) that you can put in your base which can counterbalance your vertical mechanism.

If you're going for a fixed 6-foot design, you would have more tipping issues.

The original poster is correct in considering the approach angle problem (and don't forget the trailing angle as well). Bumpers hang out significantly from your wheelbase - don't forget them in your calculations. I certainly hope we don't see any of the leading-angle-trimmed-off bumpers that some competitions allowed last year. That's not fair to those teams that follow the rules.

DjAlamose 09-01-2007 09:52

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
If you have a robot with 4wd tank steering and a 30" wheel base, the maximum ramp angle you can achieve before you bottom out (with 2" ground clearance) is only a 7 degree ramp! (This is looking at when the robot gets to the top of the ramp and is going over that corner).

This is obviously a round about number and i didn't do any special calculations for it, but still it gets the point across.

So, you would need a ground clearance of about 4.3" if the ramp was 16 degrees (the angle I have been looking at for a ramp design). Again this is 30' wheel base and 4wd.

To make getting up a ramp easy, just make your robot 6wd and you should have no problems.

By the way, does anyone know the angle of the ramp 111 (wildstang) used in their 2001 robot?


Edit:

Oh, and if your robot's CG is 48 inches above the ground and in the middle of your robot (with your robot orientated so it drives where the short side is the front), you would tip over if you attempted a ramp of 18 degrees or more. I highly doubt that any robot will have a CG at 48 inches but I always look at worst case cenario.

P.S.
Please correct me if im wrong. I did these calculations in about 10 seconds using simple triangles.

Ianworld 09-01-2007 13:30

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
The real issue with getting up ramps is as the above posters have pointed out is getting hung up as you go up over the top. The best solution for this is really just making a 6 wheel robot. There are very, very few situations where a 6 wheel robot going pretty straight up a ramp can get stuck. The reason is that the center of gravity or balance point of the robot is over a wheel. If the robot is caught on one of the points between the wheels it will usually tip to one of its wheels and maintain traction.

Brandon Holley 09-01-2007 14:05

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
If your going to have a ramp, it is quite feasable to build one with a small degree....you have 4 feet of height to work with (in the highest weight class)

DjAlamose 09-01-2007 14:10

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
asin(12/48)=14.47751218592992 deg
This is the smallest angle that you can acheive without doing any extentions.
Also, this really isn't feasable because you wont be able to get that 48" long piece, you would need some ground clearance.

So what I've been using:

asin(13/45)=16.79144711458869 deg

13 because I want to make sure that we get that 30 and not 15 for being 11.8" above the ground, and 45 because it gives a 3" ground clearance.

Brandon Holley 09-01-2007 14:31

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
hmmm...i was thinking more along the lines of not one solid piece of metal, maybe your ramp has a joint???? :yikes:

Ericgehrken 09-01-2007 14:34

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
How about a ramp on a 20 degree angle. If you want your robot to be lifted then please be able to drive up an incline of at least 20 degrees.

DjAlamose 09-01-2007 14:38

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MORT~11 (Post 552213)
hmmm...i was thinking more along the lines of not one solid piece of metal, maybe your ramp has a joint???? :yikes:

Nope, one solid piece. Of corse this is still in design and we aren't even sure this is the route we want to take.

Oh, and by the way, a sheet of aluminum diamond plate 24x48x(1/16) weighs only 7.056 lbs (yeah thats alot of weight, but holes can be drilled....Lots of holes....)

GaryVoshol 09-01-2007 15:12

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DjAlamose (Post 552200)
... 13 because I want to make sure that we get that 30 and not 15 for being 11.8" above the ground, and 45 because it gives a 3" ground clearance.

What about bumper clearance?

DjAlamose 09-01-2007 15:15

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GaryV1188 (Post 552245)
What about bumper clearance?

Rule R37 comes into play.

STANDARD BUMPERS must remain within the BUMPER ZONE when the ROBOT is resting on the floor in PLAYING CONFIGURATION. They can not be articulated or moved outside of the BUMPER ZONE. The one exception to this is STANDARD BUMPERS may be within or below the BUMPER ZONE during the END GAME if the ROBOT is in its HOME ZONE (see Figure 8-3).

So durring end game, they just fold down and out of the way.

Assassin Shadow 10-01-2007 09:15

Re: Ramp Angle Survey
 
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but does it really matter whether the robot is up past the ramp. It doesn't have to be past the corner at the top of the ramp to earn points, it just has to be at least 4 inches up the ramp. So in a worst case scenario, just make it so that your robot can make it that far up a ramp and then turn a little sideways so that they don't roll back down. Viola!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi