Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: 1889 robot design (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51703)

Gary Dillard 12-01-2007 23:38

pic: 1889 robot design
 

Alex Cormier 12-01-2007 23:39

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
I wouls have to say i am impressed. Looks good and im sure it will work well also.

Cjmovie 12-01-2007 23:45

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
It looks nice, but it also looks like someone is going to be sitting up making some holes for quite a while, if you lack a plasma cutter :-).

Seriously, it looks nice and light, while maintaining strength. I like it.

Dan Petrovic 12-01-2007 23:49

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Wow. It looks really good!

I'm a bit confused by the looks of that manipulator. How does it work?

Tim Arnold 12-01-2007 23:49

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
*c o u g h*

MattLi 12-01-2007 23:55

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cjmovie (Post 555456)
It looks nice, but it also looks like someone is going to be sitting up making some holes for quite a while, if you lack a plasma cutter :-).

Seriously, it looks nice and light, while maintaining strength. I like it.

I'm 5 ft 7 in tall and I weigh only 105 pounds. Last year our team was discussion shoving me in the shipping crate, giving me a 5 week supply of carrots and having me drill holes in our AIM HIGH bot.

Arefin Bari 12-01-2007 23:59

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Looks like some 2005 robots will be back in action...

Jonathan Norris 13-01-2007 00:11

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Wow.. this is about as early as I have seen a full CAD drawing up here. I wonder if we will see more teams posting theirs now that the ice has been broken :p. That looks like a solid design there, don't know how well it will drive with a big ramp hanging off the side...

CraigHickman 13-01-2007 00:11

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Wow. I really like your guy's Octagonal frame. Does anyone have Inventor drawings of one of those? I've been interested in getting a closer look to see how our team might go about building something after that style.

Looks like a great bot!

Tytus Gerrish 13-01-2007 00:11

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cjmovie (Post 555456)
if you lack a plasma cutter :-).

We don't have a plasma cutter but we have a Very helpful sponsor of B.T.I. to allow us to borrow the water jet for a bit.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Arefin Bari (Post 555456)
Looks like some 2005 robots will be back in action...

the shape and the drivetrain and the mast is a battle hardened and proven reliable design. i improved on some of the shortcomings of that drivetrain and made it significantly lighter. If you have something that works then you're probably doing something right

Arefin Bari 13-01-2007 00:17

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tytus Gerrish (Post 555487)
the shape and the drivetrain and the mast is a battle hardened and proven reliable design. i improved on some of the shortcomings of that drivetrain and made it significantly lighter. If you have something that works then you're probably doing something right

Looking forward to see it in action at Florida regional.

Scott Morgan 13-01-2007 00:23

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MattLi (Post 555469)
I'm 5 ft 7 in tall and I weigh only 105 pounds. Last year our team was discussion shoving me in the shipping crate, giving me a 5 week supply of carrots and having me drill holes in our AIM HIGH bot.

last year our team discussed using freshmen as our robot, as some of them fit in the size requirements

Guy Davidson 13-01-2007 00:25

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Looks pretty sweet. Hopefuly it runs as well as it looks.

-Guy

Brandon Holley 13-01-2007 00:30

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
whys everyone posting designs 6 days into build ?!

Brandon Holley 13-01-2007 01:31

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandon Holley (Post 555502)
whys everyone posting designs 6 days into build ?!



PS...Tytus this thing is sick...

65_Xero_Huskie 13-01-2007 08:21

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Norris (Post 555483)
Wow.. this is about as early as I have seen a full CAD drawing up here. I wonder if we will see more teams posting theirs now that the ice has been broken :p.

NOT US!!
hehe. I like the frame, it looks solid, i might just have to steal that and put it over my bed so at night i can see good worksmanship =)

Dan Richardson 13-01-2007 10:20

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
That bot looks solid, just as I had expected from the new tytus+dillard+1889 team.

That arm looks really long does that front piece roll down, or stay in its original position? Just make sure it doesn't go outside that 72" zone or otherwise it'd be bad news.

It'll be fun to see you guys at Florida.

MarsBOtkid 13-01-2007 14:48

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
looks great can't wait to see it in action.... BUT, from how it looks, you may be outside the 72" x 72" zone. Be carefull about that!!!1:ahh:

Gary Dillard 13-01-2007 17:57

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stud Man Dan (Post 555603)
That bot looks solid, just as I had expected from the new tytus+dillard+1889 team.

That arm looks really long does that front piece roll down, or stay in its original position? Just make sure it doesn't go outside that 72" zone or otherwise it'd be bad news.

It'll be fun to see you guys at Florida.

Thanks Dan.

The arm deploys at the elbow, once (spring loaded) such that the upper and lower arm sections are co-planar (co-linear in side view). That joint is just to stay within the 48 inch high envelope. The kinematics of the remaining joints use idler sprockets to ground such that the end effector always points in the same direction (into the robot as shown, away from the robot when rotated into position at the front (left in this picture). The gripper fingers (outboard red pieces) are actuated.

We prototyped the arm today; the gripper works better than I had hoped. The remaining kinematics were a little rough because of some prototyping shortcuts we took, but I've used this mechanism before and that's not a concern.

As for the 72 x 72 envelope, it fits in diagonally with Angstroms to spare, thanks to the narrow aft face of the frame which gives us an additional 5 inches of effective length. Besides, I'm sure Woody would let us use it even if it violated the rules; after all, we've put alot of engineering time into it. ;)

RichardJames 13-01-2007 18:09

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
This looks killer. Only thing I notice is that you have a compressor, but no visible pistons (excuse me if I`m wrong). Are you going to have a transmission or something? or is that for the claw...

Also, only thing that concerns me is the battery and compressor in the front. Do you think that might cause CG issues?


Last, if it`s not too much to ask, can we see it with the arm out?

lukevanoort 13-01-2007 18:30

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardJames (Post 555956)
This looks killer. Only thing I notice is that you have a compressor, but no visible pistons (excuse me if I`m wrong). Are you going to have a transmission or something? or is that for the claw...

Those are AndyMark two speed shifters on the robot, I'd assume that is what it is for.

Gary Dillard 13-01-2007 18:30

Re: pic: 1889 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardJames (Post 555956)
This looks killer. Only thing I notice is that you have a compressor, but no visible pistons (excuse me if I`m wrong). Are you going to have a transmission or something? or is that for the claw...

Also, only thing that concerns me is the battery and compressor in the front. Do you think that might cause CG issues?

Last, if it`s not too much to ask, can we see it with the arm out?

AndyMark Gen 1's with pneumatic shifter (only one gearbox shown, piston on the far side in this picture. Also pistons to actuate the ramp (not shown, but you can see the clevises in green), and the platform (again not shown).

We have all the power and electronics on the far side plus some of the ramp stuff is skewed that way to balance the battery and compressor. It's a little off center but not much.

I don't have a good picture of the current configuration deployed; I'll try to generate one on Monday


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi