Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52235)

Tytus Gerrish 18-01-2007 23:05

pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 

Brandon Holley 18-01-2007 23:06

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
i hate you


ive been machining my $@#$@#$@# off for 2 weeks and im not nearly that far

Cody Carey 18-01-2007 23:10

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Wow, that is nice. We just got our parts back from one of our sponsors, too. They were laser cut, but some of the cuts failed to go all the way through the .20 aluminum plate. We had to finish the cutting with a jig-saw.


I wish they had a water-jet :D

redbarron 18-01-2007 23:15

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Awesome!! How are you assembling all that? Welding? and how long did that take? Nice job

Tytus Gerrish 19-01-2007 00:23

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
the cutting time was 2 hours and 49 minutes

ChuckDickerson 19-01-2007 00:26

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
How much does that pile weigh just out of curiosity?

Tytus Gerrish 19-01-2007 00:30

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
29 pounds

ChuckDickerson 19-01-2007 00:32

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Sweet!

redbarron 19-01-2007 00:49

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Are you welding that together?

Tytus Gerrish 19-01-2007 01:14

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by redbarron (Post 560194)
Are you welding that together?


UlTiMaTeP 19-01-2007 01:50

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Ohh Tytus, I love you

Guy Davidson 19-01-2007 01:55

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Nice, very very nice. We have access to a lsaer jet we use to cut acryllic and lexan for prototypes and parts when needed, but we mill, lathe, cut and burn the rest of the parts.

-Guy

edthegeek 19-01-2007 02:52

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
I wish we had a waterjet. We sent our stuff to be machined last weekend and its gonna take about 1.5 weeks to get every part back.

underwood 19-01-2007 11:09

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
In the immortal words of Borat Sadjeaved:


Naice.:D

Kellen Hill 19-01-2007 20:12

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
I wish we had a Waterjet just to make our robot look better, but our teams manufactures every single part that we use which can take a shorter or longer time to do things but it's nice.

Kyle Love 19-01-2007 23:37

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
I spy a frame rail.

mizscience 19-01-2007 23:57

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Very nice. One can never go wrong with a waterjet cutter.

well, actually, one can, but that's another story, lol

:]

DonRotolo 19-01-2007 23:58

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Yes, I am jealous. very nice.

Don

windup zeppelin 20-01-2007 00:14

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
hope you end up with a clean beauty of a robot.

Cody Carey 20-01-2007 00:36

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
All those parts are sitting atop a schematic of the base... I didn't even notice that before.

JamesByrne 20-01-2007 02:39

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
I do want a water jet also, those parts look pro. they are clean, i am jealous.:)

MarsBOtkid 20-01-2007 11:51

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Looks VERY familiar.............:rolleyes:

TriggsJr 20-01-2007 13:42

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Laser would only take about 30 minutes to cut all that, and it would not have any draft. But, you would have to deburr.


Nice job looks like you have a lot of welding to do. maybe think about using 3/16 pop rivets in your design next time with an air rivet gun.
Bend flanges on the parts to rivet into.

The welding will weaken the aluminum by taking the hardeness down to T Zero at welds unless you have the frame reaged.

Kingofl337 22-01-2007 16:57

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Don't eat to much of the paste. Even though it tastes good.

Madison 22-01-2007 17:03

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TriggsJr (Post 561186)
Laser would only take about 30 minutes to cut all that, and it would not have any draft. But, you would have to deburr.

My understanding is that some fancy water cutting machines angle the nozzle to compensate for the draft angle. At the very least, that may not be a concern.

We've had a lot of 'fun' trying to tweak our plasma cutter to produce as little dross and draft as possible. We're getting better at it, but it's still frustrating.

Tytus Gerrish 22-01-2007 17:23

Re: pic: 1889 Waterjwet parts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M. Krass (Post 562687)
My understanding is that some fancy water cutting machines angle the nozzle to compensate for the draft angle. At the very least, that may not be a concern.

We've had a lot of 'fun' trying to tweak our plasma cutter to produce as little dross and draft as possible. We're getting better at it, but it's still frustrating.

the waterjet used on these parts is a 5-axis machine. we programed it one time to blast around 6000 small holes Arround this hemispherical part. but 99% of the time were only using 2 axis like this time. the draft is minimal with aluminum so it can be cleaned up in the important places with a file


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi