Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Programming (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=51)
-   -   User_Bytes taken over by breakers? (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52391)

kwilliam 20-01-2007 18:32
User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
Our team is using the .NET (2.0) Composite Dashboard Viewer to get servo and PWM data from the robot while it is running. It is supposed to let you view the camera centroid and bounding box too, but that isn't working. According to the page on the Composite Dashboard Viewer, the camera data needs to be mapped to the dashboard packet as follows:

user_byte1 = x
user_byte2 = y
user_byte3 = x1
user_byte4 = y1
user_byte5 = x2
user_byte6 = y2

I could probably figure out how to set these values, but then I noticed this in ifi_aliases.h:

Quote:
#define User_Byte1 txdata.user_byte1.allbits
#define User_Byte2 txdata.user_byte2.allbits
#define User_Byte3 txdata.user_byte3 /* This byte is now used for breaker panel byte 3 */
#define User_Byte4 txdata.user_byte4 /* This byte is now used for breaker panel byte 4 */
#define User_Byte5 txdata.user_byte5 /* This byte is now used for breaker panel byte 5 */
#define User_Byte6 txdata.user_byte6 /* This byte is now used for breaker panel byte 6 */
Is this breaker thing hardwired in the controller, so that we only get two User Bytes this year? Or is there a way to overwrite user bytes 3 through 6 with the camera data anyway?

dtengineering 20-01-2007 18:58
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
I'm not an expert at the data packets, so I might attach to this question the following one:

If you have an unused PWM (that has no servo cable attached to it) could you not use that value as an additional byte to send back to the OI?

Typically we use fewer than half of our PWMs, but the data structure of the packet seems to show that they are all returned to the OI.

Experts?

Jason

Alan Anderson 20-01-2007 20:19
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
The breaker panel feedback isn't hardwired. It was a short bit of code (in Default_Routine(), I believe) in prior years. It is only useful if you're a) using the IFI breaker panel, and b) connecting the IFI breaker to the program port on the RC.

You're not doing either of those this year, because the IFI breaker panel isn't a permitted component. If the default code still refers to it, ignore it.

Mark McLeod 20-01-2007 23:09
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering (Post 561374)
If you have an unused PWM (that has no servo cable attached to it) could you not use that value as an additional byte to send back to the OI?
Yes, you can set your unused PWMs to any byte value you chose and read it via the dashboard.

P.S. Alan caught my oversight. 255 isn't allowed over the radio link since a pair of them back to back is reserved as a special flag indicating a new packet is starting. You can set your PWMs to 255, but the Master will change them to 254 before radioing the packet back to the OI and your dashboard.

Alan Anderson 21-01-2007 00:06
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McLeod (Post 561582)
Yes, you can set your unused PWMs to any byte value you chose and read it via the dashboard.
Not any value. You can't use 255; it will get changed to 254 on the way through the radio link.

kwilliam 21-01-2007 22:30
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson (Post 561436)
The breaker panel feedback isn't hardwired. It was a short bit of code (in Default_Routine(), I believe) in prior years. ... If the default code still refers to it, ignore it.
What made me think it might be hardwired is that it isn't referenced anywhere in the default code. Did they just forget to take the comments out? If that's the case, will I need to add ".allbits" to bytes 3 through 6 like bytes 1 and 2 have?

seanwitte 22-01-2007 10:33
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwilliam (Post 562229)
What made me think it might be hardwired is that it isn't referenced anywhere in the default code. Did they just forget to take the comments out? If that's the case, will I need to add ".allbits" to bytes 3 through 6 like bytes 1 and 2 have?
I haven't looked at the code, but it might be an artifact from last year. The breaker panel sends updates over the serial port, so the code that handled that updated the user bytes. If you're not using the breaker panel code then you should be able to set the user bytes yourself.

Alan Anderson 22-01-2007 10:45
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
The reference to "allbits" is only on the first two user bytes. I think it's that way because the Dashboard Viewer program can show each individual bit of those two user bytes, and there is an associated bit array in the user byte structure that you can use to set those bytes' bits one at a time if you want to.

Don't worry about it. Just set User_Byte1 through User_Byte6 the way you want, make sure nothing else in Default_Routine() is setting them to something you don't want, and everything should work fine.

kwilliam 22-01-2007 17:33
Re: User_Bytes taken over by breakers?
 
Thanks! It works great.
Code:
        //Send camera data to the Dashboard.
        User_Byte1 = CENTROID_X;
        User_Byte2 = CENTROID_Y;
        User_Byte3 = UPPER_X;
        User_Byte4 = UPPER_Y;
        User_Byte5 = LOWER_X;
        User_Byte6 = LOWER_Y;
(We defined aliases for the camera data.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi