Chief Delphi
Page 2 of 7 < 1 2 34567 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   The 2007 High Score Thread (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55174)

JoshD 03-03-2007 00:25
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1885.Blake (Post 589131)
I think you overlooked that a big reason that 116 was harrassed very little, if at all, in that match is that the 1885 (our/my team) Robocat was their wingman.... The opposing alliance was definitely trying to "play defense on them"; but we (the red alliance) all stuck to our agreed roles and ensured those defensive efforts fell short.

I forget the other Red alliance bot's name/number, but they played a part in the win too.

Blake
I believe there was only one bot playing defence againt you guys. 975, my team, got a keeper rung around our flag pole, so we couldn't pick up anymore pieces, our stratigest just forgot to suggest we play defence. Also, 122 deployed their ramps early so they were a nonfactor since they sat in the home zone the whole time.

teenmisfit 03-03-2007 00:36
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
At the Granite State Regional the high score was 256pts with team 501, I believe 58 and another robot i forgot. This game is really proving to be very well balanced between strategy, defense, and offense. Last years was very fun but this game feels so basic and natural it make the rounds way more competive.

StephLee 03-03-2007 00:50
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snappel328 (Post 589115)
512??

768 is definitely the must-have before the Championship is over with.
I'm pretty sure that's impossible, unless it's a BYOT match. Bring your own tues, that is. You get 3 keepers and 18 ringers of each color in a match, so that's 21 of each color...with 24 spots to score on the rack. So, unfortunately, we won't be seeing anything over 596.

(Also...two rings of 8 around would be 536, so long as they're also making little rows of two vertically. :D )

StephLee 03-03-2007 01:24
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1885.Blake (Post 589131)
I think you overlooked that a big reason that 116 was harrassed very little, if at all, in that match is that the 1885 (our/my team) Robocat was their wingman.... The opposing alliance was definitely trying to "play defense on them"; but we (the red alliance) all stuck to our agreed roles and ensured those defensive efforts fell short.

I forget the other Red alliance bot's name/number, but they played a part in the win too.

Blake

And I say KUDOS to the teams that don't mind playing defense like that and sticking to it. It's not all scoring, as that match proves...high scores come from robots who aren't being shoved around, and that comes from tough teammates who do the countershoving.

teenmisfit 03-03-2007 07:07
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by StephLee (Post 589151)
And I say KUDOS to the teams that don't mind playing defense like that and sticking to it. It's not all scoring, as that match proves...high scores come from robots who aren't being shoved around, and that comes from tough teammates who do the countershoving.
But there are robots that put tubes up well and have so much power to just push there way to any spot even if someone is defending. Two speed transmissions, super high traction wheels, and four cim motors seem to be a rare thing on robots this year. It feels like not too many teams went all out on there drivetrain like in previous years

StephLee 03-03-2007 09:10
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by teenmisfit (Post 589173)
But there are robots that put tubes up well and have so much power to just push there way to any spot even if someone is defending. Two speed transmissions, super high traction wheels, and four cim motors seem to be a rare thing on robots this year. It feels like not too many teams went all out on there drivetrain like in previous years
From what I've seen on the webcast, I'd tend to agree. It seems like people went for agility over power this year to maneuver closer to the rack more effectively.

ScoutingNerd175 03-03-2007 13:46
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
501, 175, and 1824 just scored 316 to 0!! In the 2nd of their quarter finals at BAE. (they are the first seed alliance)

charlie1218 03-03-2007 20:19
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snappel328 (Post 589115)
512??

768 is definitely the must-have before the Championship is over with.
remember the 64 points you would get for having rows of three up. and then add a 60 for ramps...

overlord 03-03-2007 20:50
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
A few nice wrap arounds today in the NJ Regional, mostly coming from alliances featuring Team 25. Also a nice spoiler by Team 359 on a wrap around!

DanDon 03-03-2007 21:39
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Teams 375, 836, and 1676 had a wrap-around during today's first match in New Jersey, with 1676 playing defense.

Jonathan Norris 03-03-2007 21:56
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoutingNerd175 (Post 589329)
501, 175, and 1824 just scored 316 to 0!! In the 2nd of their quarter finals at BAE. (they are the first seed alliance)
Amazing match, full bottom row and two on top of a ramp.

scottyh2006 04-03-2007 01:00
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie1218 (Post 589512)
remember the 64 points you would get for having rows of three up. and then add a 60 for ramps...
And the 7 rows of 8 equals 56 and add all that up and you get 628 points as a max score and if any team does that they would be my hero. and from what i saw it might be team 501. If they had more time.

Petey 04-03-2007 16:43
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoutingNerd175 (Post 589329)
501, 175, and 1824 just scored 316 to 0!! In the 2nd of their quarter finals at BAE. (they are the first seed alliance)
That match was amazing, and made our alliance of 1474/500/1073 feel a lot better when they only beat us 64-8 in the finals...

1824 has a great ramp and 501 is an excellent stacker, but lemme tell ya, Buzz is going to generate quite a bit of eponymous activity at Nats...

Tomasz Bania 09-03-2007 21:02
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
GLR's highest score so far...

Match 49 3:31 PM Red: 818,1114, and 280 vs. Blue: 451, 1701, and 57. Final Score Red:256 Blue:0.

SizzelChest330 10-03-2007 02:05
Re: The 2007 High Score Thread
 
Rawc (968) and Spyder (1622) two great scoring robots of the Los Angeles regional put up 260 points this afternoon.

589 1622 968 vs. 1070 1722 687 Final Score = 260-2


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:18.
Page 2 of 7 < 1 2 34567 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi