Outside the box defense
 

while i was at BAE i noticed during one match a very interesting occurance, the blue alliance had gone into the red home zone to retrieve a ringer and in doing so had knocked all of the others to the ground, during the end game the pink ramp-bot [a very good one] tried to deploy their ramps, but the ramps landed partialy on ringers and were unable to be deployed fully. Even after moving around to dislodge one ringer the alliance was unable to get a robot off the ground in the remaining time. while this was done unintentionaly it presented an interesting sort of passive defensive strategy.

while watching matches i also came up with this idea: if your alliance has a strong rampbot [190 or the like] that can stand up to a beating, and a good scorer, would it be worth taking the 10 point penalty to deploy the ramps on the enemy side of one of the alleyways beside the rack?

i talked to the head ref at BAE and he told me that the penalty would only be 10 points provided the ramp-bot did not move around and tip over the opposing team's robots. so basicaly, you have one side of the rack blocked, leaving your robot to score freely on that side. if your other alliance partner can play some defense on the other alley it leaves the opposing team with about a fourth of the rack to score on.

any thoughts on this? do you think this would not be GP?
or has anyone seen any other outside the box thinking defensive strategys?

Re: Outside the box defense
 

http://www2.usfirst.org/2007comp/Upd...pdate%2015.pdf

As per Update 15, the head ref may give you a yellow flag for excessively breaking rules in order to gain an advantage. At NJ, the refs seemed to be very generous in such cases.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

I like the idea of knocking down the opponent's tubes in order to get in their way when they try to get up a ramp. At St. Louis, I saw several teams have trouble with a tube getting in their way when they try to get up a ramp.

In order to block one alley well, it's not necessary to incur a 10-point penalty, so long as your robot can extend to less than 72 inches, but close to it.

In my humble opinion, purposely breaking the rules to gain an advantage, even if you're willing to take the penalty, is not good sportsmanship. In this case especially, it's possible to defend without breaking the rules.

I don't think it's 'thinking outside the box' to break the rules, it's 'thinking outside the bounds'

Re: Outside the box defense
 

I don't agree with it either, nor find it GP to break rules...

I think his "out of the box" was in reference to exceeding 72 by 72 not because it was a bright idea to break rules.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

Actually, you'd be knocking down your OWN tubes leaning against the far side of the field. So what consitutes herding in this situation? I heard a few herding penalties given out. If you just knock them all down intentionally without pushing the bulk of them in a specific direction, is that ok?

Re: Outside the box defense
 

Outside the box:

Drop a ring on another teams ramp once they've deployed but before the 15s penalties start. You'll find it's really hard to get on a ramp with something else on it.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

i certainly dont intend to try that ramp deployinjg idea, it seems unfair anyway. but the tube one is good, even if unintentional

i dont think any penalty can be incurred for knocking down the tubes, most robots can pick up off the floor better anyway.

putting a ringer on top of a robot is not as good, cause its active defense, if you can have the area clogged with tubes you dont have to be there to prevent ramping: aka you can be scoring more. also ringers are really light so the robot could just push it away.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

Herding would be the intent to gather more than one of your color's tubes into a certain area. If memory serves me right, a team at the BAE regional started their practice matches by driving to the opposite side of the field, lined their robot against the wall, and pushed the tubes to one corner. That is the only example of herding that I've seen or heard of so far.
To answer your other question, If you were to go down the line, knocking down one ringer at a time, it shouldn't be considered herding.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

At the start of match #49 at VCU, in autonomous mode, our robot got clotheslined by a spider and we were hung up on the rear bar on our frame with all 4 wheels off the ground. Before we could resolve this issue, we were tipped so that our ramp and chassis blocked 4 scoring positions, and we could lower and raise our ramp to slap the spider arm, making it harder to score.

Watch match #49 at VCU on soap.circuitrunners.com. The clip starts with us already halfway to the rack.

We call it "jumping to hyperspace".;)

Re: Outside the box defense
 

It's true, several teams had trouble getting onto a ramp with a tube on it.
My theory was, if you can knock down your own tubes at their end of the field, there will be tubes in the way at the end of the match.

You folks are right, though, it'd be difficult to knock them all down without looking like you're herding them, and any team whose ramp faces the rack, rather than the side walls, wouldn't be affected as much by this.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

An outside the box defense that was used against us twice at PNW in week 1 happened at the end of the match with a 0-0 and with the other alliance up 4-0 in these situations the other team took 30 points of penalties to stop us from getting a robot on our ramp. The team did this because their alliance had no ramp. I thought this was a flagrant breaking of the rules but neither time was the team yellow flagged or disabled. I really disliked this because we would have had two more wins for this and neither time did the Ref stop the other team. I implored the ref after the first match to make sure that team didn't do that again because we had them against us in another match and the second time they still didn't get a yellow card even after knocking a robot off us in the last 5 sec of one match. An interesting strategy nut one I don't like...

Re: Outside the box defense
 

I think it would be better, if say you were a strong ramp bot to just drive into the alleyway and block people, I mean why sit there and take the warning/yellow card, when you could just block people by driving in front of them couldn't you? I mena there isn't a large amount of space there from what I can see, just turn length wise and drive back and forth between the rack and the wall lol.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

A quite brilliant defense, given the situation. Whoever thought of that is pretty good.

Don

Re: Outside the box defense
 

Thanks Don!

One of the best parts about driving is improvising. In another match, we took our arm off to reweld it, so we drove around using our ramp (in upright position, occasionally bringing it down a bit) to stop robots from lifting tubes up to score. This move is now known on the team as "Shaq-attack".

The weird thing about improvising on-field is that you don't realize you're doing it until your teammates tell you about it later.

Re: Outside the box defense
 

you have possibly the fastest robot i have ever seen!

another neat idea! i've seen this work: your oponent is about to score, instead of ramming them, ram the rack... then go pick up a tube while they wait for it to stop shaking... or go take their tube from them...