| JaneYoung |
18-03-2007 17:55 |
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bongle
(Post 600123)
Which is why I think we should change it to artdutra suggested. It doesn't air dirty laundry, it acknowledges the existence of the debate as a part of team organization (which is a fact: it exists), and does it in a very good way. It also contains the fact that FIRST more or less leaves the 'inspiring' up to us. The only problem is that I haven't found a direct quote from FIRST to that effect.
|
In a way this can be looked at as a research project. You may have considered this or done this. What about contacting FIRST, explaining what you are attempting to do, and ask for a quote? Nothing like going to the source.
My thinking is that Wikipedia can be a valuable tool and the marketing potential for FIRST is incredible as far as helping get the word out. Your interest in presenting the different facets of FIRST's make-up/dynamics has potential and I think FIRST would be interested in learning about your efforts.
|