![]() |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
In San Diego, I think a team 1388 hasn't been given due credit to their arm. Their averages aren't great because it was broken for a match or two, but they had a great autonomous, and scored once or twice there. They could easily place 3-5 ringers with defense.
1388 ended up carrying their alliance to the semi-finals, losing to the eventual winners. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I have a test tomorrow, so I'm not going to go through 8 pages to see if they've been mentioned, but I'll offer up team 555, Montclair Robotics. We competed with them at the NJ Regional and their grabber really impressed me when I saw it in action-- some of the reasoning behind the engineering inspiration awards this year has been for creative ways to pick up tubes, and they had a pretty nifty device figured out for human loading:
http://www.montclair.k12.nj.us/schoo...555/index.html The lifter was designed like a forklift to go from the bottom spider legs to the top and then flip over the top to human load, if I remember correctly. I definitely thought it was one of the coolest designs for a tube grabber. I don't think their stats were the greatest at the regional, which is why I'll add 25 and 103 to my list, but I still thought they had the coolest bot there. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Hahaha, oh yes, we're quite a secret society...
For those at WMR, feel free to ask stats at any time. I'll try to get the excel database from Pat tonight. I have the one updated through Friday, but I don't have Saturday's data on there. (Note: We didn't scout during the tournament, so my info will only be from Qualifications) |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I'm dieing to see the GLR and BMR data...
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
Which is with my mom at work. So! I can't do it right now, but I will eventually. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I looked at the MARRS Data and extracted the best tube scorers at Wisconsin and Buckeye. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=56258
Here are the best scorers from Wisconsin: Code:
1736 3.7Code:
1038 4.13 |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
At boston: I would have to say 69, 126, 1626, 2079, thats about what I can think off. All 4 teams can put tubes on really fast and easily at least it seems.
NJ: 25, 103. Wow its been a long time, I need my memory checked. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Here's what I have from GLR, if you would like a listing of how your individual team did, let me know, but because our database is over a meg, I can't upload it. Also, I looked through and I'm not sure how far through Saturday these are updated. Every team has at least through the 6th match, most through the 7 and some the 8.
Code:
Ramp Rankings Rack Rankings |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Is this ranking done based on avg points earned per match, average ringers scored per match, or some other method?
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
My apologies. The rank is for the top robot in each category. On the right side, it is for the top ringer scorers and on the left, the top ramp bots. It just lists them in order so that when our picker goes out, he knows what order to go in. The numbers are for total ringers scored in qualifyings and total number of robots that were lifted by that team in qualifyings.
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Brazilian Team #1860 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0BRuWPyiI
In this match, we only place 4 rings because our sensor was defective, but generally, we placed 5 and keeper. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Code:
Team #: Sum of tubes scored: |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
[quote=slickguy2007;607837]
Code:
Team #: Sum of tubes scored: |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Wow. Lots of good offensive robots at Boston, huh?
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
[quote=slickguy2007;607841]
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
[quote=JoelGoering;607987]
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Do these scores include elimination matches? I assume that they would not but I just hadn't seen it clarified.
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
88 definitely did much better in Boston than NJ. I was quite surprised too. The elimination matches at Boston were crazy. So many tubes were going up, especially the winners 69, 126 and 125. They were on a roll:cool:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Wow, the results are quite wide, here. A few teams seem to come up a lot, but it also seems to vary from region to region. I guess we'll see at nats, eh?
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Heres the Palmetto regional top ten as of Friday by # of tubes scored (we didn't collect data on Saturday)
Code:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Only one match, an alliance made it past 100, they were so close to a full eight, but the defense playing here at Colorado was done really well.
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I think that team 1574 should be considered as a really heavy scorer. I think we have an average of almost 5 tubes per match, with a maximum of 7.
Here you can see some videos of us in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6kWTSkCrI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk7kzLBvNoE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaOdriTTfUY |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I don't know if anybody has mentioned them yet but 234, Cyber Blue, is one of the fastest teams I have seen since I first saw 1114. I turned away from the field while watching one of their quals at Long Island, and when I turned back 20 seconds later, they had put up three more tubes. I credit these guys and girls with our Long Island win, we couldn't have done it without them and their amazing offensive machine.
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I am only a little offended that my team, 1425, has been neglected so far...
We went undefeated scoring tubes throughout the Las Vegas Regional, including tough qualifying matches against such teams as 254 and 233 In San Diego we were second only to 330 in average rings. We were regularly defended in the elimination tournament at Vegas, but still scored 3 - 5 rings... You might want to check us out at: http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv...5&sbutt=search Really, we're good |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
After seeing them at Las Vegas, there are more than a few juggarnauts who deserve a mention:
233, 254, and 1425, who averaged more than 4 tubes per match each. 79 and 987, who both brought in over 3.5 per match. 39, 60, and 1902, who averaged above 3 a match. Vegas was amazing. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
My vote goes to 1425 and 254
We had the honor of working with teams 1425 and 254 in the elimination rounds at Las Vegas. It was incredible working with these teams... consistently they would score 6 rows and our alliance actually did an 8 + 1 in one semi. My favorite match had 254 spoiling the only blue ringer at the last second in the third quarter final against a great team... it was really a statement... the rack was theirs... It was great fun playing with them and all the other great teams at LV. This was our first year and seeing great teams play at the top of their game was pure pleasure for us... Watch out for 1425 and 254 at Atlanta... We hope to get there too... thanks to everyone and good luck to all!! |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
-Alex |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I agree. They put together a row of 7 in one of their first qualifying matches in the blink of an eye. Looked up at the clock after the row was done, and there were 50 seconds remaining. Definitely the best scorer at the Long Island Regional. They could be lethal at the Championships, but only if they are better under defense.
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I'd have to say 254 and 100.
254's bot was blazingly fast, it's grabber mechanism could go all the way up in a matter of short moments, and it's grab/release times were astounding. 100's bot was also very fast, it's grabber mechanism worked very well, and they got rows of 8 on the center row several times at Davis. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I say my favorite was team 56, i mean look at this! 3 on 1 and they managed to OWN. lol :D
Team 11 was also one of my favorites, they were really fast scorers! In fact, their design was very much like one of ours in the beginning of the build season, except with a few more bells and whistles. Well..maybe just bells. :p |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
Thanks for drafting us! |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I went to 3 regionals this year (NJ, Chesapeake, Philly). Here are the best ringers I saw (subjectively):
103 - lightning fast 25 - great I.D. grabber and elevator 75 - awesome arm - the best top row scorer I've seen 272 - solid all around 341 - :D Because I watched our robot more than I watched anyone else's |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
We also had another game in New York City Regional that was 2vs1 and we managed to get 9 on the rack and make a 360 in our home zone in the 2 minutes. Watch it here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3SILYGU114 We are really looking forward for the Championships, just a week from now |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
and Skunkworks has now said something about us!! =) I vote for 330.. I didn't get to see them but apperantly they pwnd in san diego |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
Teams 330 and 254 I would nominate for the best ringers of 2007 that I have seen. 254 has an amazing drive base and quick arm, while 330's simplicity and effective arm put it at the top of the heap. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
The best tube scorers that I have seen would be: 148 2158 364 16 (their autonomous was killer) Pavan. |
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I have to second this nomination. At the Buckeye Regional, my team plotted our best case senerio. This senerio was team 1126 selecting 1038 and 1528. We had 1126 and 1038 as the top two scorers at the regional.
Quote:
|
Re: 2007 best tube scorers
I would have to say that the best grabber goes to 330. It worked well, but the robot was not as fast and it wobbled a bit. 1114 also had a great grabber and their drive train made them quick and maneuverable. They were probably the best two scorers in Curie.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi