Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   2007 best tube scorers (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55826)

rsilverstein 28-03-2007 12:17

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
In San Diego, I think a team 1388 hasn't been given due credit to their arm. Their averages aren't great because it was broken for a match or two, but they had a great autonomous, and scored once or twice there. They could easily place 3-5 ringers with defense.

1388 ended up carrying their alliance to the semi-finals, losing to the eventual winners.

MasterChief 573 28-03-2007 15:53

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterChief 573 (Post 604618)
Anyone have the statistics on the best scorers at GLR?

Well...Does anyone?

Joe Ross 28-03-2007 16:06

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterChief 573 (Post 604618)
Anyone have the statistics on the best scorers at GLR?

1114 and 1504 collect that data, but you might have to bribe them to make it public :-p

MasterChief 573 28-03-2007 16:12

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Ross (Post 606746)
1114 and 1504 collect that data, but you might have to bribe them to make it public :-p

That's not fair, maybe I'll ask one of their members to share and vow an oath of secrecy.:rolleyes:

cire 28-03-2007 16:26

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterChief 573 (Post 606754)
That's not fair, maybe I'll ask one of their members to share and vow an oath of secrecy.:rolleyes:

I'd like to get in on this secret GLR best tube scorer info too.. Im curious how well we did in comparison to other teams, even though we were seeded 45th.

smurfgirl 28-03-2007 16:27

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wpdrummer (Post 601560)
1369 is a dynamyte robot, but I havn't seen it at a competition.

Hey- 1124 named our robot "Dynamite"! I've never heard anyone else describe a robot as "dynamite" before.

Po-ser 28-03-2007 17:13

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I have a test tomorrow, so I'm not going to go through 8 pages to see if they've been mentioned, but I'll offer up team 555, Montclair Robotics. We competed with them at the NJ Regional and their grabber really impressed me when I saw it in action-- some of the reasoning behind the engineering inspiration awards this year has been for creative ways to pick up tubes, and they had a pretty nifty device figured out for human loading:

http://www.montclair.k12.nj.us/schoo...555/index.html

The lifter was designed like a forklift to go from the bottom spider legs to the top and then flip over the top to human load, if I remember correctly. I definitely thought it was one of the coolest designs for a tube grabber. I don't think their stats were the greatest at the regional, which is why I'll add 25 and 103 to my list, but I still thought they had the coolest bot there.

Beth Sweet 29-03-2007 14:12

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Hahaha, oh yes, we're quite a secret society...

For those at WMR, feel free to ask stats at any time. I'll try to get the excel database from Pat tonight. I have the one updated through Friday, but I don't have Saturday's data on there.

(Note: We didn't scout during the tournament, so my info will only be from Qualifications)

KTorak 29-03-2007 15:07

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I'm dieing to see the GLR and BMR data...

Dan Petrovic 29-03-2007 15:18

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KTorak (Post 607270)
I'm dieing to see the GLR and BMR data...

I have data from BMR, but it's only from Thursday and Friday and it's in my car.

Which is with my mom at work.

So! I can't do it right now, but I will eventually.

Joe Ross 29-03-2007 20:22

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I looked at the MARRS Data and extracted the best tube scorers at Wisconsin and Buckeye. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=56258

Here are the best scorers from Wisconsin:

Code:

1736        3.7
537        2.55
1732        2.15
2052        2.09
1623        2

And from Buckeye:

Code:

1038        4.13
494        4
1126        3.67
451        3.13
70        3
191        2.88
291        2.88
65        2.56
537        2.55
548        2.5


popnbrown 30-03-2007 06:40

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
At boston: I would have to say 69, 126, 1626, 2079, thats about what I can think off. All 4 teams can put tubes on really fast and easily at least it seems.

NJ: 25, 103. Wow its been a long time, I need my memory checked.

Beth Sweet 30-03-2007 08:02

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Here's what I have from GLR, if you would like a listing of how your individual team did, let me know, but because our database is over a meg, I can't upload it. Also, I looked through and I'm not sure how far through Saturday these are updated. Every team has at least through the 6th match, most through the 7 and some the 8.
Code:

Ramp Rankings                        Rack Rankings       
                               
TEAM #        BOTS UP RANK        TEAM #        RINGERS
57        4        1        1114        28
66        3        2        67        27
453        3        3        503        25
67        3        4        573        24
279        2        5        33        23
1213        2        6        65        23
1941        2        7        326        19
815        2        8        1015        18
548        1        9        1023        15
1188        1        10        1503        15
2137        1        11        70        14
240        1        12        201        14
1528        1        13        1504        12
33        1        14        1701        12
1        1        15        322        11
308        1        16        1674        11
1023        1        17        451        11
322        1        18        862        10
1243        1        19        815        10
469        1        20        1596        9
1549        1        21        548        8
503        1        22        494        8
2163        1        23        910        8
1711        0        24        1243        7
1322        0        25        1        7
68        0        26        448        7
494        0        27        818        7
226        0        28        1254        6
313        0        29        68        5
448        0        30        2163        5
519        0        31        1213        5
1254        0        32        308        5
280        0        33        1188        4
1504        0        34        1322        4
573        0        35        280        4
1674        0        36        1896        3
326        0        37        830        3
70        0        38        469        2
818        0        39        835        2
1189        0        40        1711        1
830        0        41        1189        1
451        0        42        1549        0
406        0        43        66        0
1286        0        44        406        0
201        0        45        894        0
1503        0        46        226        0
894        0        47        519        0
65        0        48        1528        0
903        0        49        453        0
1596        0        50        470        0
910        0        51        2137        0
1701        0        52        440        0
1015        0        53        57        0
1896        0        54        313        0
440        0        55        1941        0
470        0        56        279        0
1114        0        57        903        0
835        0        58        240        0
862        0        59        1286        0


KTorak 30-03-2007 08:31

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Is this ranking done based on avg points earned per match, average ringers scored per match, or some other method?

Beth Sweet 30-03-2007 08:34

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
My apologies. The rank is for the top robot in each category. On the right side, it is for the top ringer scorers and on the left, the top ramp bots. It just lists them in order so that when our picker goes out, he knows what order to go in. The numbers are for total ringers scored in qualifyings and total number of robots that were lifted by that team in qualifyings.

Dan 1038 30-03-2007 10:00

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Ross (Post 607420)
I looked at the MARRS Data and extracted the best tube scorers at Wisconsin and Buckeye.

We were the best scorer at Buckeye? How cool is that! Thanks Joe...

sloteera 30-03-2007 12:00

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Brazilian Team #1860 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0BRuWPyiI

In this match, we only place 4 rings because our sensor was defective, but generally, we placed 5 and keeper.

cire 30-03-2007 13:34

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beth Sweet (Post 607583)
Here's what I have from GLR, if you would like a listing of how your individual team did, let me know, but because our database is over a meg, I can't upload it. Also, I looked through and I'm not sure how far through Saturday these are updated. Every team has at least through the 6th match, most through the 7 and some the 8.
Code:

Ramp Rankings                        Rack Rankings       
                               
TEAM #        BOTS UP RANK        TEAM #        RINGERS
57        4        1        1114        28
66        3        2        67        27
453        3        3        503        25
67        3        4        573        24
279        2        5        33        23
1213        2        6        65        23
1941        2        7        326        19
815        2        8        1015        18
548        1        9        1023        15
1188        1        10        1503        15
2137        1        11        70        14
240        1        12        201        14
1528        1        13        1504        12
33        1        14        1701        12
1        1        15        322        11
308        1        16        1674        11
1023        1        17        451        11
322        1        18        862        10
1243        1        19        815        10
469        1        20        1596        9
1549        1        21        548        8
503        1        22        494        8
2163        1        23        910        8
1711        0        24        1243        7
1322        0        25        1        7
68        0        26        448        7
494        0        27        818        7
226        0        28        1254        6
313        0        29        68        5
448        0        30        2163        5
519        0        31        1213        5
1254        0        32        308        5
280        0        33        1188        4
1504        0        34        1322        4
573        0        35        280        4
1674        0        36        1896        3
326        0        37        830        3
70        0        38        469        2
818        0        39        835        2
1189        0        40        1711        1
830        0        41        1189        1
451        0        42        1549        0
406        0        43        66        0
1286        0        44        406        0
201        0        45        894        0
1503        0        46        226        0
894        0        47        519        0
65        0        48        1528        0
903        0        49        453        0
1596        0        50        470        0
910        0        51        2137        0
1701        0        52        440        0
1015        0        53        57        0
1896        0        54        313        0
440        0        55        1941        0
470        0        56        279        0
1114        0        57        903        0
835        0        58        240        0
862        0        59        1286        0


Thank you Beth, this is just another show of proof that seed ranks can be all about luck. Ranked 8 in best tube scorers, but 45th seed.

Dylan Gramlich 30-03-2007 16:58

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan 1038 (Post 607615)
We were the best scorer at Buckeye? How cool is that! Thanks Joe...

yeah you guys were from our count also:D #1 and #3 make a good pair if u ask me:]

Greg Ross 30-03-2007 17:23

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cire (Post 607680)
Thank you Beth, this is just another show of proof that seed ranks can be all about luck. Ranked 8 in best tube scorers, but 45th seed.

Yep. And that's why it's important to scout rather than simply to look to the top seeds when you do your alliance selection: The qualities you need in your alliance partner may not be measured by the seeding algorithm.

slickguy2007 30-03-2007 18:10

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Code:

Team #:        Sum of tubes scored:
25                              24
836                            20
103                            20
75                              17
1403                          16
177                            16
1218                          15
359                            15
237                            14
716                            13
293                            12
223                            12
375                            10
341                            9
1672                            7
816                            7
2016                            6
1807                            6
11                              6
555                              6
486                              6
1302                            5
613                              5
88                                4

This is the info that I have from the NJ regional. It might be a little off, but this is about 90% accurate.

slickguy2007 30-03-2007 18:22

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
[quote=slickguy2007;607837]
Code:

Team #:        Sum of tubes scored:
88                              28
126                            26
1403                          23
69                              23
121                            22
1626                          21
1100                          19
125                            17
2079                          16
1350                          16

This is our scouting info from Boston. Once again, I can't guarantee that it is 100% correct, but its pretty close. Enjoy.

EmilioM 30-03-2007 18:34

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Wow. Lots of good offensive robots at Boston, huh?

JoelGoering 30-03-2007 23:18

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
[quote=slickguy2007;607841]
Quote:

Originally Posted by slickguy2007 (Post 607837)
Code:

Team #:        Sum of tubes scored:
88                              28
126                            26
1403                          23
69                              23
121                            22
1626                          21
1100                          19
125                            17
2079                          16
1350                          16

This is our scouting info from Boston. Once again, I can't guarantee that it is 100% correct, but its pretty close. Enjoy.

Just one question, if you look at the NJ results, 88 only put on 4 tubes. Then in Boston they get 28. I don't know about you, but that seems fishy to me. Was a scouter putting down tubes for an entire alliance, and not just one specific robot? Maybe 88 got that much better, I didn't see either regionals so I don't know, but I just wanted to point that out.

Nuttyman54 30-03-2007 23:54

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
[quote=JoelGoering;607987]
Quote:

Originally Posted by slickguy2007 (Post 607841)

Just one question, if you look at the NJ results, 88 only put on 4 tubes. Then in Boston they get 28. I don't know about you, but that seems fishy to me. Was a scouter putting down tubes for an entire alliance, and not just one specific robot? Maybe 88 got that much better, I didn't see either regionals so I don't know, but I just wanted to point that out.

I have no trouble believing that 88 put up that many tubes at Boston, so they may just have been having problems at NJ

Vogel648 31-03-2007 02:54

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Do these scores include elimination matches? I assume that they would not but I just hadn't seen it clarified.

slickguy2007 31-03-2007 09:40

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vogel648 (Post 608040)
Do these scores include elimination matches? I assume that they would not but I just hadn't seen it clarified.

Actually these statistics are only from qualifying matches. We don't scout during finals because we want the team to enjoy the fruits of their hard work (the team making it into finals).:)

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoelGoering (Post 607987)

Just one question, if you look at the NJ results, 88 only put on 4 tubes. Then in Boston they get 28. I don't know about you, but that seems fishy to me. Was a scouter putting down tubes for an entire alliance, and not just one specific robot? Maybe 88 got that much better, I didn't see either regionals so I don't know, but I just wanted to point that out.

88 got much better in Boston. I remember thinking the same thing, but I was assured by one of the scouts (who saw 88 in both nj and boston) that this was accurate.

popnbrown 31-03-2007 11:34

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
88 definitely did much better in Boston than NJ. I was quite surprised too. The elimination matches at Boston were crazy. So many tubes were going up, especially the winners 69, 126 and 125. They were on a roll:cool:

Astronouth7303 31-03-2007 19:50

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Wow, the results are quite wide, here. A few teams seem to come up a lot, but it also seems to vary from region to region. I guess we'll see at nats, eh?

lukevanoort 31-03-2007 21:55

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Heres the Palmetto regional top ten as of Friday by # of tubes scored (we didn't collect data on Saturday)
Code:


Rank    Team Number    # of Tubes    Avg per match    Final rank
1.          1626          33            4.125          4
2.          832            26            3.250          13
3.          1251          25            3.571          1
4.          1746          23            2.875          10
5.          342            22            2.750          27
6.          343            22            2.750          5
7.          34            21            3.00            23
8.          587            21            2.625          45
9.          1249          18            2.571          16
10.        1319          17            2.125          2


Spider-Man 31-03-2007 22:03

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lukevanoort (Post 608438)
Heres the Palmetto regional top ten as of Friday by # of tubes scored (we didn't collect data on Saturday)
Code:


Rank    Team Number    # of Tubes    Avg per match    Final rank
1.          1626          33            4.125          4
2.          832            26            3.250          13
3.          1251          25            3.571          1
4.          1746          23            2.875          10
5.          342            22            2.750          27
6.          343            22            2.750          5
7.          34            21            3.00            23
8.          587            21            2.625          45
9.          1249          18            2.571          16
10.        1319          17            2.125          2


Nice to see 34 rocketing up the ringers :). Congrats to my alma mater team for the Imagery award and their awesome robot.

LightWaves1636 01-04-2007 03:53

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Only one match, an alliance made it past 100, they were so close to a full eight, but the defense playing here at Colorado was done really well.

Guy_E 01-04-2007 17:12

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I think that team 1574 should be considered as a really heavy scorer. I think we have an average of almost 5 tubes per match, with a maximum of 7.

Here you can see some videos of us in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6kWTSkCrI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk7kzLBvNoE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaOdriTTfUY

Jay Trzaskos 01-04-2007 17:43

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I don't know if anybody has mentioned them yet but 234, Cyber Blue, is one of the fastest teams I have seen since I first saw 1114. I turned away from the field while watching one of their quals at Long Island, and when I turned back 20 seconds later, they had put up three more tubes. I credit these guys and girls with our Long Island win, we couldn't have done it without them and their amazing offensive machine.

Squirrel Lord 01-04-2007 23:39

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I am only a little offended that my team, 1425, has been neglected so far...
We went undefeated scoring tubes throughout the Las Vegas Regional, including tough qualifying matches against such teams as 254 and 233
In San Diego we were second only to 330 in average rings. We were regularly defended in the elimination tournament at Vegas, but still scored 3 - 5 rings...
You might want to check us out at: http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv...5&sbutt=search
Really, we're good

Guy Davidson 02-04-2007 00:06

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
After seeing them at Las Vegas, there are more than a few juggarnauts who deserve a mention:
233, 254, and 1425, who averaged more than 4 tubes per match each.
79 and 987, who both brought in over 3.5 per match.
39, 60, and 1902, who averaged above 3 a match.
Vegas was amazing.

Bob Steele 02-04-2007 00:17

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
My vote goes to 1425 and 254

We had the honor of working with teams 1425 and 254 in the elimination rounds at Las Vegas. It was incredible working with these teams... consistently they would score 6 rows and our alliance actually did an 8 + 1 in one semi.

My favorite match had 254 spoiling the only blue ringer at the last second in the third quarter final against a great team... it was really a statement...
the rack was theirs...

It was great fun playing with them and all the other great teams at LV.
This was our first year and seeing great teams play at the top of their game was pure pleasure for us...

Watch out for 1425 and 254 at Atlanta...

We hope to get there too... thanks to everyone and good luck to all!!

CrosbyAR 02-04-2007 00:41

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Trzaskos (Post 608955)
I don't know if anybody has mentioned them yet but 234, Cyber Blue, is one of the fastest teams I have seen since I first saw 1114. I turned away from the field while watching one of their quals at Long Island, and when I turned back 20 seconds later, they had put up three more tubes. I credit these guys and girls with our Long Island win, we couldn't have done it without them and their amazing offensive machine.

Actually when i was behind them watching it; they put up the 3 tubes literally as soon as the defense backed off. It was amazing.

-Alex

Joel J 02-04-2007 00:56

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I agree. They put together a row of 7 in one of their first qualifying matches in the blink of an eye. Looked up at the clock after the row was done, and there were 50 seconds remaining. Definitely the best scorer at the Long Island Regional. They could be lethal at the Championships, but only if they are better under defense.

Otaku 02-04-2007 01:31

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I'd have to say 254 and 100.

254's bot was blazingly fast, it's grabber mechanism could go all the way up in a matter of short moments, and it's grab/release times were astounding.

100's bot was also very fast, it's grabber mechanism worked very well, and they got rows of 8 on the center row several times at Davis.

WillItBlend 02-04-2007 04:30

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I say my favorite was team 56, i mean look at this! 3 on 1 and they managed to OWN. lol :D

Team 11 was also one of my favorites, they were really fast scorers! In fact, their design was very much like one of ours in the beginning of the build season, except with a few more bells and whistles. Well..maybe just bells. :p

Ben Martin 02-04-2007 19:29

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Trzaskos (Post 608955)
I don't know if anybody has mentioned them yet but 234, Cyber Blue, is one of the fastest teams I have seen since I first saw 1114. I turned away from the field while watching one of their quals at Long Island, and when I turned back 20 seconds later, they had put up three more tubes. I credit these guys and girls with our Long Island win, we couldn't have done it without them and their amazing offensive machine.

Thanks, you guys had a great scoring machine as well. 5-6 tubes per match is nothing to laugh at. :) You were outstanding.

Thanks for drafting us!

Jared Russell 02-04-2007 19:39

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I went to 3 regionals this year (NJ, Chesapeake, Philly). Here are the best ringers I saw (subjectively):

103 - lightning fast
25 - great I.D. grabber and elevator
75 - awesome arm - the best top row scorer I've seen
272 - solid all around
341 - :D Because I watched our robot more than I watched anyone else's

khaledelfarra 02-04-2007 20:38

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillItBlend (Post 609420)
I say my favorite was team 56, i mean look at this! 3 on 1 and they managed to OWN. lol :D

Team 11 was also one of my favorites, they were really fast scorers! In fact, their design was very much like one of ours in the beginning of the build season, except with a few more bells and whistles. Well..maybe just bells. :p

Thank you, I remember that game, it was awesome.
We also had another game in New York City Regional that was 2vs1 and we managed to get 9 on the rack and make a 360 in our home zone in the 2 minutes. Watch it here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3SILYGU114
We are really looking forward for the Championships, just a week from now

OZ_341 03-04-2007 00:28

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abwehr (Post 610001)
I went to 3 regionals this year (NJ, Chesapeake, Philly). Here are the best ringers I saw (subjectively):

103 - lightning fast
25 - great I.D. grabber and elevator
75 - awesome arm - the best top row scorer I've seen
272 - solid all around
341 - :D Because I watched our robot more than I watched anyone else's

I would definitely add Spike 293 and Buzz 175 to this list of teams that we directly observed.

SBass 03-04-2007 01:12

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirrel Lord (Post 609325)
I am only a little offended that my team, 1425, has been neglected so far...
We went undefeated scoring tubes throughout the Las Vegas Regional, including tough qualifying matches against such teams as 254 and 233
In San Diego we were second only to 330 in average rings. We were regularly defended in the elimination tournament at Vegas, but still scored 3 - 5 rings...
You might want to check us out at: http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv...5&sbutt=search
Really, we're good

Alex you aren't supposed to nominate yourself lol

and Skunkworks has now said something about us!! =)

I vote for 330.. I didn't get to see them but apperantly they pwnd in san diego

gobeavs 03-04-2007 02:35

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirrel Lord (Post 609325)
I am only a little offended that my team, 1425, has been neglected so far...
We went undefeated scoring tubes throughout the Las Vegas Regional, including tough qualifying matches against such teams as 254 and 233
In San Diego we were second only to 330 in average rings. We were regularly defended in the elimination tournament at Vegas, but still scored 3 - 5 rings...
You might want to check us out at: http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv...5&sbutt=search
Really, we're good

We've received the recognition we deserved. We have been fortunate to play with some great teams that have benefited us a lot. It was an honor to play with great ringers such as 233, 987, 1540, 39...I'm sure I've left some off, too.

Teams 330 and 254 I would nominate for the best ringers of 2007 that I have seen. 254 has an amazing drive base and quick arm, while 330's simplicity and effective arm put it at the top of the heap.

Pavan Dave 03-04-2007 06:27

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Ross (Post 607811)
Yep. And that's why it's important to scout rather than simply to look to the top seeds when you do your alliance selection: The qualities you need in your alliance partner may not be measured by the seeding algorithm.

Unfortunately many teams do not understand this concept. I saw some bad calls at Lone Star and they seemed as if they did know what was going on. I think that many teams went unrecognized at the LSR because of this lack of scouting and this "blind faith" in seeding stats. Kryptonite and the ausTIN CANs were some of THE best bots in their class, but due to a combination of bad alliance partners and good opponents they stood no chance.

The best tube scorers that I have seen would be:
148
2158
364
16 (their autonomous was killer)


Pavan.

kortlan 03-04-2007 09:40

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pavan (Post 610369)
I think that many teams went unrecognized at the LSR because of this lack of scouting and this "blind faith" in seeding stats. Kryptonite and the ausTIN CANs were some of THE best bots in their class, but due to a combination of bad alliance partners and good opponents they stood no chance.

i agree. Kryptonite had awesome forklift lifters and the ausTIN CANs had an amazing robot, exspecially for being a rookie team. it was a took me by surprise that neither were picked. i was for sure they were going to go fast.

Steve Ketron 15-05-2007 10:26

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I have to second this nomination. At the Buckeye Regional, my team plotted our best case senerio. This senerio was team 1126 selecting 1038 and 1528. We had 1126 and 1038 as the top two scorers at the regional.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan 1038 (Post 604312)
Thanks Travis! We have been pretty successful, but I need to nominate 1126, Sparx, as one of the elite (No pun intended, Travis) hangers based on thier performance at Buckeye. These guys are awesome, they have a great process to acquire the tubes, which is very forgiving, and they can put 'em wherever they want quickly. Trust me, you want these guys on your side!


Cartwright 15-05-2007 16:39

Re: 2007 best tube scorers
 
I would have to say that the best grabber goes to 330. It worked well, but the robot was not as fast and it wobbled a bit. 1114 also had a great grabber and their drive train made them quick and maneuverable. They were probably the best two scorers in Curie.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi