![]() |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
After hearing an FTA explain why you should never use "graciously accept", we began saying, "Team 2959 would love to unleash the beast with you". (We refer to our mascot and robot as "The Beast".) At Lansing, our field captain used a play on what the MC said about our captain though. (Something about comets... I don't remember.) I'm a fan of "punny" ones, honestly. Have fun with whatever you choose to say!
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Alliance Selections have been a lie!
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Let me pose a question here:
What's the big deal? The fun thing about language is that if everyone knows what you mean, it doesn't actually matter what you say, and I think there are better uses of our time than language/grammar-policing alliance selections. If you want to use "graciously accept", more power to you. If you don't, then don't. So long as you don't trip over your own words like last year at RIDE and mash together "graciously" and "gratefully" forming something like "grashfully", which ends up sounding like "gracefully" with a lisp. |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
An example: the difference between nauseated and nauseous. Consider this situation: someone in the pits forgot to put on deodorant and is standing right next to me. I want to tell them they are nauseous, but when I do, they think I mean they are nauseated, and they are rightly confused. Of course, it is the responsibility of the speaker to make sure his point is conveyed accurately, but wouldn't it be so much easier if we could all be concise and precise. Using words sloppily like this isn't the end of the world, but at the end of the day, it makes it that much harder to convey what you want in the way you want to. I leave you with a relevant xkcd: ![]() |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
Here's the problem with that line of thought: When it leads to the creation of new words with a specific and generally-understood meaning, it can be a good thing. But when you take an existing useful word and make it ambiguous, it can be a bad thing, especially if that word has no suitable unambiguous replacement. |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
I panicked as my team representative and said "Thanks, we're in."
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
I graciously accepted a bunch of food this Easter Sunday.
I said "Thank you." I did not say "I graciously accept this food." I'd have been shunned for saying that. |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
Yeah that'll get you a robotics intervention. |
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi