![]() |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
Thank you, thank you, thank you for bringing this up. This is one of those little things that causes me to grind my teeth in frustration at almost every event. My former-English-teacher grandmother turns in her grave every time this phrase is uttered (which means that around lunchtime on most Saturdays in March, she is spinning at about 72 rpm). A strict interpretation of the rules of grammar would permit the use of "gracious" as an adverb in "we graciously accept." However, in use the word "gracious" is applied in reference to someone/thing else, and never to oneself. To do so is an improper use of the word, a violation of social context, and to be blunt, it makes one come across as conceited. In short, labeling yourself as gracious is, in and of iteslf, an ingracious act. While I think we can all understand that no harm is intended by any of those that may mistakenly use this phase, I would encourage the use of any of the suggested alternative phrases. "We accept your gracious offer" would be a perfect response. "We gratefully accept!" would be a wonderful response from a team that wasn't sure if they were going to make it into the elimination rounds. Even "Whoa!!! Yeah! Absolutely! We are SOOO there!" would work. And of course "we are ecstatic about the opportunity to accept your offer, and we will pay you the two dozen Krispy Kremes right after lunch" is always appropriate. -dave |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
I think it's time to start a movement to change the Standard Cliche Response to "Team blargy-blarge professionally accepts!"
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
More than once I've heard "We graciously decline," which stuck in my craw.
How about "let's get it on!" or "let's do this thing!" Speaking of rituals that get annoying, I have had several visitors mention to me that they tire of introducing each team before each match, through quals & elims. They complain that it is repetitive, redundant, brings down the level of action, and is redundant. Any thoughts? |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
At St. Louis our rep said "oh snap team 829 accepts."
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
But that works too :D Quote:
I didn't quite understand what you were saying for a second. That was so much fun :D |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
I'm just surprised how people are even nit-picking on even little things like this. In my opinion this is where forms of political correctness is getting way out of hand.
It's one thing to advise of the proper usage of a term- I agree that's Ok. But today every little nuance is so critically examined for no other reason but to say "You're wrong and I'm right." What's this world coming to? |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
EDITED: I just wanted to add that Boiler was being ironic on purpose. It was -- you know -- like -- humor. |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
As annoying as it may be, "graciously accepting" has momentum that's tough to squash at this point in time, and the benefits of GP certainly outweigh this brief irritation. We'll just have to chalk it up to "WOEWITWISTFT" and accept that it's something we're going to have to live with.
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Here is the draft and acceptance between teams 56 and 375 at the 2007 NYC regional:
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
I have a question:
Do teams graciously decline another teams invitation to join their alliance? |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
Has team 857 ever answered with a, "Yah, you betcha!" |
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
Re: You Cannot Graciously Accept
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi