Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Regional Winners (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55999)

MasterChief 573 21-03-2007 17:43

Regional Winners
 
I'm just curious which teams are regional winners this year? We won GLR along with 1015 and 503, great guys.

Cowmankoza 21-03-2007 17:46

Re: Regional Winners
 
1251, 1270 and 86 won UCF regional this year

Nuttyman54 21-03-2007 17:48

Re: Regional Winners
 
Team 1516 (The Grizzlies), 190 (Gompei and the HERD) and 1280 (The Raging Seabiscuits) won at SVR.

deshirider430 21-03-2007 17:50

Re: Regional Winners
 
2108, 540, 843 at VCU

MattD 21-03-2007 17:54

Re: Regional Winners
 
Hope I didn't make any mistakes here... correct me if anything is wrong.

BAE: 501, 175, 1824
VCU: 2108, 540, 843
NJ: 25, 103, 1302
PNR: 997, 272, 1087
St. Louis: 1444, 829, 45
Arizona: 39, 60, 1013
Bayou: 1912, 462, 1683
FLR: 1713, 250, 1450
Florida: 86, 1251, 1270
GLR: 573, 503, 1015
Los Angeles: 254, 330, 4
Pittsburgh: 123, 247, 337
Wisconsin: 2169, 537, 2194
Brazil: 1860, 1382, 2243
Boilermaker: 1730, 234, 1555
Chesapeake: 293, 75, 203
Detroit: 123, 247, 903
Kansas City: 935, 1775, 1997
Midwest: 111, 1710, 904, 1850
Peachtree: 1127, 1369, 1539, 1848
Silicon Valley: 1280, 1516, 190
UTC: 195, 558, 1124
NYC: 1302, 354, 2274

AdamHeard 21-03-2007 17:55

Re: Regional Winners
 
254, 330 and 4 at LA.

Rich Ross 21-03-2007 19:06

Re: Regional Winners
 
i feel like our time would be better spent in other threads when all of this information is already sitting there on the FIRST website. If you look there, you will save space, and waste less of the bandwidth on this site.

1359th Scalawag 21-03-2007 19:54

Re: Regional Winners
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ross (Post 602605)
i feel like our time would be better spent in other threads when all of this information is already sitting there on the FIRST website. If you look there, you will save space, and waste less of the bandwidth on this site.

But posting it here creates an opportunity for discussion.

MasterChief 573 21-03-2007 19:57

Re: Regional Winners
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1359th Scalawag (Post 602630)
But posting it here creates an opportunity for discussion.

Exactly, this thread allows people to post who the regional winners are and discuss their opinions of them.

mizscience 21-03-2007 23:07

Re: Regional Winners
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ross (Post 602605)
i feel like our time would be better spent in other threads when all of this information is already sitting there on the FIRST website. If you look there, you will save space, and waste less of the bandwidth on this site.

Having this information in one place is very convenient for quick searches and reference. I doubt one thread that is actually effective in providing information to the FIRST community - what I believe is one of the purposes of Chief Delphi - could be considered a "waste" of bandwidth.

:cool:

Nuttyman54 22-03-2007 00:19

Re: Regional Winners
 
Well if it's about discussion, I suppose I should elaborate on our alliance partners:

1516 is quite literally, a box on wheels. But a very very helpful box on wheels. They could get in the way like the best of them, kept their calm during the match, and always got back and on the ramps. Consistency and good strategy got them to 3rd seed at a regional where getting up ramps was everything.

1280 was a real find, and evidently overlooked by most of the other teams (2nd to last pick). We expected them to go a lot sooner. Consistency is also their strong suit, and they can put up a good number of tubes and get back in time to get up the ramps. Also good in any sort of pinch, they saved us many times during eliminations, whether it be freeing us from defense or deploying their ramps when 190 fell victim to a loose wire.

Both teams were great partners and worked well as a cohesive team. Consistency is what won us the regional.

Rich Ross 22-03-2007 13:34

Re: Regional Winners
 
Sorry about my earlier post. It seemed strange because all the posts before me were simply a listing. Now that there is discussion i don't think that its a waste or anything. I also am not trying to discredit the efforts of any teams. I'm glad to see so many teams that i know about doing well. Congrats to the winners.

Again, i just thought it was somewhat silly to make a list, but if there is conversation as to how alliances decided who to pick and other things like that, i am all for this thread.

ALIBI 22-03-2007 13:41

Re: Regional Winners
 
You can see all the match results, awards etc. when you go to each regional listed here:

http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc...ts.aspx?id=430

penguain 22-03-2007 13:45

Re: Regional Winners
 
Kansas City Winners.....
935
1775
1997(rookie)

kathimm1 27-03-2007 07:44

Re: Regional Winners
 
anyone know who one flr

JoeJank103 27-03-2007 08:43

Re: Regional Winners
 
103, 25, and 1302 won the New Jersey regional. Third year in a row baby, second with 25.

kibbs425 27-03-2007 09:18

Re: Regional Winners
 
Boston Regional:
69 Hyper
125 Nutrons
126 GaelForce

... NU-Hyper-Force!!!!

travis48elite 27-03-2007 09:34

Re: Regional Winners
 
Buckeye Regional:
291 CIA
48 Delphi E.L.I.T.E.
379 RoboCats

Joe Ross 27-03-2007 11:47

Re: Regional Winners
 
Updated list:
BAE: 501, 175, 1824
VCU: 2108, 540, 843
NJ: 25, 103, 1302
PNR: 997, 272, 1087
St. Louis: 1444, 829, 45
Arizona: 39, 60, 1013
Bayou: 1912, 462, 1683
FLR: 1713, 250, 1450
Florida: 86, 1251, 1270
GLR: 573, 503, 1015
Los Angeles: 254, 330, 4
Pittsburgh: 123, 247, 337
Wisconsin: 2169, 537, 2194
Brazil: 1860, 1382, 2243
Boilermaker: 1730, 234, 1555
Chesapeake: 293, 75, 203
Detroit: 123, 247, 903
Kansas City: 935, 1775, 1997
Midwest: 111, 1710, 904, 1850
Peachtree: 1127, 1369, 1539, 1848
Silicon Valley: 1280, 1516, 190
UTC: 195, 558, 1124
NYC: 1302, 354, 2274
Boston: 126, 69, 125
Buckeye: 291, 379, 48
San Diego: 330, 696, 835, 1216
Waterloo: 1114, 2056, 771

redbarron 27-03-2007 18:39

Re: Regional Winners
 
Well if the purpose of this thread is to give quick references towards the winning alliances, then I'll throw in my 2cents for the Florida Regional. 1251 seeded 4th and picked up 1270 and then 86. 1251 and 1270 were the offensive bots and 86 was the defensive/ramp bot.

1251-They took a lot of defense through eliminations and were basically all offensive. At the end the made it back to the ramps. They are effective at scoring, have great scouting, and they are a good team to pair with because they are very easy to work with.

1270-We have a robot that can play offense and defense so in the finals when 86 deployed we stopped scoring after a couple ringers and left the rest of the scoring to 1251 and started playing defense. Through the quarter finals and the semis we just scored as much as we could and then we would head back to the ramp.

0086-Was in my opinion the best ramp bot there and were also a great defensive bot. I was amazed that they were still available for the third pick. They played good defense and then they would head back and deploy for 1251 and us to climb and then they took about 5 seconds to lift.

EricH 27-03-2007 19:50

Re: Regional Winners
 
I'm seeing several 4-team alliances. Is this unusual? I think there are often only one or two per year, and just in 4 weeks there have been three. Also, I think the number of rookies winning is high this year.

David Guzman 27-03-2007 20:03

Re: Regional Winners
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by EricH (Post 606211)
I'm seeing several 4-team alliances. Is this unusual? I think there are often only one or two per year, and just in 4 weeks there have been three. Also, I think the number of rookies winning is high this year.

I think this might be due to the fact that in elimination rounds is where the most aggressive play takes place. This year the rack is rather dangerous for robots that are not too robust. Also the BaneBot kit gearboxes are not that great so many teams break those.

MasterChief 573 27-03-2007 20:10

Re: Regional Winners
 
Well I was at GLR and Boilermaker and here's what I thought about the winning teams.

Team 503 - Incredible team players, they are deffinately capable of working in sync with other whoever they're partners with. A great versitile robot capable of good scoring and clutch ramp deployment. Easily a team to keep an eye out for.

Team 1015 - These guys have a really cool arm and are good scorers, they are capable of making play in the heat of battle when needed. They play hard and have a solid offensive with the posibility of good defense.

Team 573 - That's us! A robot fully capable of scoring with the best of them, excellent strategic player. Between their extremely long arm and meccanum drive they are hard to defend and are very skilled at moving past defense and scoring big time.

Team 1555 - Deffinately a team that seemed to come out of no where to most but proved capable of getting the job done when needed. They played strong and finished even stronger.

Team 234 - A very unique robot that proved to be a fantastic scorer. Full of special features and unique qualities this robot rised to the top and proved to be a powerful force in the competition.

Team 1730 - With a great ramp and an even greater arm these guys were deffinately the team to beat at Boilermaker. Prooving that their robot was a versitile and consistent machine they became the number one seed and made a lasting impression on yours truly.

SSMike 27-03-2007 21:50

Re: Regional Winners
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kathimm1 (Post 605783)
anyone know who one flr

Teams 1713, 1450, and 250 won at FLR. (#3 Seed)

Other REgional Winners are poster above

pakratt1991 02-04-2007 15:09

Re: Regional Winners
 
UC Davis was 100, 997, 1458

Joe Ross 02-04-2007 15:22

Re: Regional Winners
 
Updated list:

BAE: 501, 175, 1824
VCU: 2108, 540, 843
NJ: 25, 103, 1302
PNR: 997, 272, 1087
St. Louis: 1444, 829, 45
Arizona: 39, 60, 1013
Bayou: 1912, 462, 1683
FLR: 1713, 250, 1450
Florida: 86, 1251, 1270
GLR: 573, 503, 1015
Los Angeles: 254, 330, 4
Pittsburgh: 123, 247, 337
Wisconsin: 2169, 537, 2194
Brazil: 1860, 1382, 2243
Boilermaker: 1730, 234, 1555
Chesapeake: 293, 75, 203
Detroit: 123, 247, 903
Kansas City: 935, 1775, 1997
Midwest: 111, 1710, 904, 1850
Peachtree: 1127, 1369, 1539, 1848
Silicon Valley: 1280, 1516, 190
UTC: 195, 558, 1124
NYC: 1302, 354, 2274
Boston: 126, 69, 125
Buckeye: 291, 379, 48
San Diego: 330, 696, 835, 1216
Waterloo: 1114, 2056, 771
Israel: 1574,1657, 1950
Colorado: 555, 1583, 1636
Sacramento: 100, 997, 1458
GTR: 2056, 1114, 176
Las Vegas: 1425, 254, 1983
Lone Star: 118, 476, 1745
Palmetto: 1319, 832, 342
Philadelphi: 84, 341, 181
Long Island: 229, 234, 545
West Michigan: 703, 469, 494

Joel J 02-04-2007 15:29

Re: Regional Winners
 
Is this a record low for multiple regional winners?

123
234
247
254
330
997
1114
1302
2056

It looks like there have been more 1st then second, and 2nd then first this year. Any info to back that up?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi