![]() |
Bad Call?
Entering the Finals, my team's alliance was doing great, we got both robots onto the ramp and would have won but the referees made a strange call. Part of the ramp robot we were on had an innertube under it. They decided not to give us that 60 points and we lost the match because of the rule that states "scoring robots must not be supported by any feild elements".
The intent of that rule is so that none of the robots that are lifted hang on the game structures or sit on innertubes. In this case, the supported robots were only supported by another robot but we were not given those 60 points. We lost the next match and were eliminated from the finals. I would like imput from other teams. Was thier judgement right? |
Re: Bad Call?
Was any part of the lifting robot touching the toroid? If not, then I believe the refs were in error.
|
Re: Bad Call?
Please see the following thread for a discussion of what seems like the same situation: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=55742 which includes links to a question about that situation on the Q/A forum.
The Game Design Committee as clarified in updates the Q/A forum does not agree with your interpretation of the intent of the rule. As you can see from that thread, there are many people who don't like the interpretation. |
Re: Bad Call?
It seems that the Refs are consistant at the three regionals I have attended and called it that way at each.
|
Re: Bad Call?
It may not be the right call, but it seems consistent with what has been happenning at other regionals. The exact same thing happened to us at GLR.
|
Re: Bad Call?
Quote:
|
Re: Bad Call?
In this case though, the tube could have been removed and we would have lost no height whatsoever.
|
Re: Bad Call?
While I don't like the way the rule is interpreted, the call is the right one (as it conforms with both the rulebook and the Q&A clairification)
**Big hint to all rampbots** Make sure the area is clear, even of deflated tubes, before deploying your ramps. There is a good thread in YMTC http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...highlight=YMTC |
Re: Bad Call?
Can I please get a link directly to the Q&A about this?
|
Re: Bad Call?
Quote:
|
Re: Bad Call?
We had a similar call go against us at Boilermaker. Didn't like it, either -- but it was the right call.
Our student operator on the field asked the head ref about the call right after the match, and pointed out that had the tube been removed the robots would not have changed height. However, as the Q&A response cited above makes clear, "supported" is not interpreted by such a test -- it is implied by contact of a gamepiece under the ramp-bot, and a robot supported by a supported robot is also supported. :ahh: |
Re: Bad Call?
Quote:
|
Re: Bad Call?
Quote:
http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=1522 If you see the thread that Joe linked, there's a lot of discussion as to what "SUPPORTED" means, because it isn't defined in the manual. I'm pretty sure that nobody wants to carry on that particular debate any more. Personally, I don't agree with what the GDC is calling "SUPPORTED", but all I can ever ask for is that the rules are enforced consistently, regardless of how ridiculous the rule is. Tubes that are touching the underside of lifting robots have negated all lifts at every event I have attended or watched, and I applaud the refs for being consistent. |
Re: Bad Call?
We were on the other side of a ruling like this in palmetto. During our semi final match, the opponent had two robots lifted and was ruled that the bottom robot was touching a field element and did not give the 60 points and then we came back for our second match and found out that the ruling had been reversed and we were now the losing team. They stated the reason was that the lifting robot could touch a field element but the two robots on the ramp were not touching anything so they adjusted the score and we lost that match.
|
Re: Bad Call?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi