Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Championship Event (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56555)

Barry Bonzack 05-04-2007 15:18

Go Rookies Go
 
I'll be pulling for the Florida teams and my friends on 86, 108, 180, and 1065.


...But I'll be rooting hardest for my Rookies in Oklahoma 2165! Go Big Blue!

Dgrez 05-04-2007 17:58

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Similar to what was originally posted, here is a deeper look at the curie division:
16 Semifinalist Kansas
34 Quarterfinalist Bayou & Palmetto
48 Won Buckeye; Semifinalist Toronto; Finalist Pittsburg
60 Won Arizona; Semifinalist Las Vegas
67 Semifinalist Great Lakes; Quarterfinalist Michigan
74 Quarterfinalist Michigan & Midwest
86 Won Florida
97 6-4 Boston
108 Finalist Florida; Quarterfinalist Las Vegas
118 Finalist Bayou
121 Finalist Boston
126 Won Boston
141 Quarterfinalist Michigan & Boilermaker
159 Quarterfinalist Colorado
176 Won Toronto; Finalist UTC
180 Semifinalist Florida
195 Won UTC
224 3-4 New Jersey; 1-5-1 Chesapeake
234 Won Long Island; Won Boilermaker
246 4-6 Boston
269 Quarterfinalist Wisconsin; 5-3 Toronto
291 Won Buckeye; Semifinalist Pittsburg
314 Quarterfinalist Detroit & Pittsburg
330 Won San Diego & Las Vegas
339 Finalist Chesapeake; 3-3-2 VCU
343 Semifinalists VCU & Palmetto
357 Semifinalists Philly & Bayou
365 Quarterfinalists Phillidelphia & Finger Lakes
395 Quarterfinalists New York & Philadelphia
456 Quarterfinalists Bayou
469 Won Michigan; Finalists Detroit; Quarterfinalists Great Lakes
498 Quarterfinalists Arizona
527 Quarterfinalists Long Island
545 Won Long Island
558 Won UTC
612 Finalists Chesapeake; Semifinalists VCU
648 Finalists Midwest
694 Finalists New York
716 Quarterfinalists UTC; 4-3 New Jersey
771 Won Waterloo; 3-4 Toronto
830 Semifinalists St. Louis; Quarterfinalists Waterloo; 3-4 Great Lakes
862 4-4 Great Lakes
910 Semifinalists Michigan; 3-4 Great Lakes
967 Quarterfinalists St. Louis
1001 3-4 Buckeye
1015 Won Great Lakes
1033 Quarterfinalists VCU
1065 Quarterfinalists Florida
1087 Won Northern Pacific
1114 Won Toronto & Waterloo; Semifinalists Great Lakes
1137 5-3 VCU
1155 Finalists New Jersey; Quarterfinalists New York
1218 Semifinalists New Jersey; 4-2 Chesapeake
1270 Won Florida; Quarterfinalists Buckeye
1305 Finalists Toronto & Waterloo
1341 4-4 Florida
1418 Semifinalists Chesapeake
1502 Finalists Detroit; Quarterfinalists St. Louis
1510 Quarterfinalists Northern Pacific; 4-6 San Diego
1523 Quarterfinalists Florida
1535 5-6 Waterloo
1539 6-4 Palmetto
1563 1-6 New York
1617 3-3 New Jersey
1636 Won Colorado
1647 Semifinalists Philadelphia
1675 4-3 Buckeye; 1-6 Wisconsin
1700 4-2 Silicon; 3-5 Northern Pacific
1714 Quarterfinalists Wisconsin; 3-5 Buckeye
1732 Semifinalists Midwest & Wisconsin
1811 2-4 New Jersey
1826 Semifinalists Colorado
1850 Won Midwest; 3-5 Wisconsin
1872 Quarterfinalist Boilermaker; 4-3 Buckeye
1929 4-4 New York
1950 Won Israel
2010 Quarterfinalists Pittsburg; 5-3 Buckeye
2046 Quarterfinalists Northern Pacific
2054 5-4 Michigan
2067 4-5 UTC
2100 5-3 Florida
2137 3-5 Great Lakes
2165 Finalists Kansas
2166 Semifinalists Waterloo; Quarterfinalists Toronto
2252 3-5 Buckeye
2283 Semifinalists Detroit

After taking that information and giving point values to how well the teams did (4- Won...3 Finalist....etc. and if they didn't make the playoffs i used there winning percentage) and then averaging them by the number of regionals and then multiplying by a consistency value (1 for 1 regional and .3 added to that for however many regionals they went to such as 1.6 for 3 regionals) here is how our division breaks down accordingly:
1. 234
2. 330
3. 1114
4. 48
5. 176
6. 86
7. 126
8. 195
9. 545
10. 558
11. 1015
12. 1087
13. 1636
14. 1950
15. 469
16. 60
17. 291
18. 1305
19. 612
20. 1270
21. 118
22. 121
23. 648
24. 694
25. 2165
26. 771
27. 1850
28. 108
29. 343
30. 357
31. 1155
32. 1502
33. 1732
34. 339
35. 16
36. 180
37. 1418
38. 1647
39. 1826
40. 2283
41. 67
42. 2166
43. 830
44. 1218
45. 910
46. 34
47. 74
48. 141
49. 314
50. 365
51. 395
52. 1599
53. 456
54. 498
55. 527
56. 967
57. 1033
58. 1065
59. 1523
60. 2010
61. 2046
62. 269
63. 1872
64. 716
65. 1510
66. 1714
67. 1137
68. 2100
69. 1700
70. 97
71. 1539
72. 2054
73. 862
74. 1341
75. 1617
76. 1929
77. 1535
78. 2067
79. 1675
80. 1001
81. 246
82. 2137
83. 2252
84. 224
85. 1811
86. 1563

There are a lot of great teams, good luck to everyone

SamC 05-04-2007 18:20

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dgrez (Post 612611)
330 Won San Diego & Las Vegas

We actually won San Diego & Los Angeles, not Las Vegas...

WillisRF 05-04-2007 18:21

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SgtMillhouse648 (Post 612233)
Im not sure how big ramps are going to be though. In all of the finals at Midwest, not one team used ramps to the best of my knowlege, even though they had them at their disposal. Team 1000 played defense the whole time and we never even tried to climb up on their ramp. Wildstang had a ramp, but no-one ever climbed up even though they deployed it a couple of times. Two excellent tube scorers and an okay def. bot can outscore any other robots with ramps.

Malhon


At both Palmetto and Peachtree ramps were a big factor. A good combo for an alliance is two good scorers and 1 good defensive robot. Kell did very well at Peachtree. That alliance made it to the finals with a combination of good scoring and Kell's defense and ramps.

At Palmetto, the finals came down to the ramps. One alliance had 3 scorers the other had two and a defensive ramp bot. The ramp team got 60 bonus point in each of their two wins in the finals which lead to them being Region Champs.

The Lucas 05-04-2007 19:17

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dgrez (Post 612611)
395 Quarterfinalists New York & Philadelphia

395 Quarterfinalists New York & Pittsburgh

ComputerWhizIA 05-04-2007 19:29

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Just Wondering....

How do teams, 2165 and 2166, get into the same division??

The Lucas 05-04-2007 19:35

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ComputerWhizIA (Post 612705)
Just Wondering....

How do teams, 2165 and 2166, get into the same division??

FIRST changed the 1,2,3,4 division sorter slightly.
Check out the odd sequence here
Notice a repeating pattern? cause I don't

Donut 05-04-2007 19:46

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
I don't think 365 deserves a spot only 4 places ahead of us, they performed far better at their Regional events than we did. It's just for fun anyway though, so I guess it doesn't really matter.

Going off that list though, I predict that at least 1 of the Curie winning alliance members comes from below spot #50 on that list.

johnr 05-04-2007 19:53

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
i thought maybe first was dividing countries evenly, but a quick look shows we have five from canada and archimidies has none.

prettycolors91 05-04-2007 20:15

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
HOT can't wait! This division looks amazing....And a special shout out to team 2283 Panteras (We love you guys!). Good luck to everybody, and an early congrats to whoever wins this crazy thing :D

Wigginsgame 05-04-2007 21:14

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by prettycolors91 (Post 612758)
HOT can't wait! This division looks amazing....And a special shout out to team 2283 Panteras (We love you guys!). Good luck to everybody, and an early congrats to whoever wins this crazy thing :D

Wow! I haven't even realised that they were in our division. I'm super excited now! I loved them when they visited us, they were so adorable at GM and then when we visited them at Detroit Regional. I hope that ya'll do awesome!

redbarron 05-04-2007 22:00

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
This division is definitely looking tough..Has anyone started a Curie scouting thread yet? Anyways good luck to all teams and lets make the world champions from Curie this year.:D

Jacob Plicque 05-04-2007 22:08

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by redbarron (Post 612868)
This division is definitely looking tough..Has anyone started a Curie scouting thread yet? Anyways good luck to all teams and lets make the world champions from Curie this year.:D

See the thread http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=56608
It has a sample format for each team to modify with robot data and a picture
:D

Jacob Plicque 05-04-2007 22:27

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnr (Post 612192)
that list of champs and finalists is pretty long. do we have the most in our division or just the best? we haven't got the chance to show it yet, because of the need to score, but 910 is always ready for a little defence.

It appears that FIRST went out of their way to distribute the regional finalists and champions equally among the four divisions. That is why the 1, 2, 3, 4 sorting model was not followed in 2007. Each of the other divisions has roughly 30 champs or finalists.;)

redbarron 05-04-2007 23:00

Re: CURIE Discussion - 2007 Championship
 
Quote:

See the thread http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=56608
It has a sample format for each team to modify with robot data and a picture
Thanx I posted our team info on there I think everyone should post their info on there so that we have a good scouting information database on the Curie Division.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi