![]() |
Galileo Division 2007
what teams do you think we should look out for in atlanta
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
A lot of CyberBlue's great regional champion partners got assigned to Galileo, including Clarkson (229), Driven (1730), and Pulse (1555). If any of those 2 are in the same alliance, you know who I'll be rooting for ;)
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
25 definitely
be afraid. be very afraid. Jacob |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
an addition to that: 25 and 103 together (NJ winners 2 years in a row) |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Every team is a team to look out for. We don't know who has improved their robot, and so everyone is a possible amazing competitor.
I'm looking forward to playing some great matches with amazing teams. Best of luck to everyone! GALI- |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I'm just surprised to see every Xerox sponsored team at the same division for the very first time. Too bad I couldn't make it down to Atlanta this year - crazy Engineering Risks and Benefits Analysis Exam :(
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Well, let the plugs begin...
294. We can play great defense (watch the San Diego elims, and that was on aluminum wheels with zipties for tread). We can also score decently; watch match 1 of san diego (We didn't have much practice though, so it was kind of awkard). |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
At least i hope with all the Xerox teams in one division we could get some matches together.:) |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
All I know is, I'm so happy to have 217 in our division again this year. Hopefully the pigs and chickens will be on the same side of the field this year come eliminations. :) This should be fun guys, looks like an exciting division, several good teams.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I was excited to see that 250 is in the same division as 1902. I hope we can have at least one match on the same alliance just for the cheering alone. The possibility of hearing "PIGGY PIGGY PIGGY! OINK OINK BOOM!" just makes my spine tingle.:D
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Whatever you say, make sure the facts support your argument, look through 1114's 2007 Scouting Information ,
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/1975? From a quick glance, I would say 25, 45, 103, 123, 217, 250, 503, 540, 1126, 1730, 1902 |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Team 1515
- Finalist in Colorado - Highest score of the regional during the quarter finals http://youtube.com/watch?v=0nzMbW1WmHI We're happy to be in such a great division! |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Assuming I did this right (and the sorting algorithm stays the same), here's some qualifying information.
Code:
"Vets" "Mids" "Rookies" |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
This one is stacked. I was like holy crap this is going to be the championship division
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Brazilian teams are competitive too...
#1860 and #1382 are together! |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
(It's hard to avoid feeling sorry for Curie sometimes.) |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Yeah it would be interesting to see what the actual sorting algorithm is and what the reason is behind it.
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Team 401 was ranked 14th at VCU. We have a great lifter and can score tubes, but had some trouble at VCU. However, we have tweaked a bit and are able to score a bit faster and will attempt to score keepers in autonomous mode, with use of 6 different auto modes on our switch box. Our best match at VCU was match 60. Check it out on our homepage: www.team401.org and click on the video in the middle.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
PS: I don´t speak english very well, i´m sorry =/ |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
wow fake match 11 would be awesome to watch!!
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
There is nothing fake about it. It has been determined that this is definitively how they do [at least the first set of] qualifying matchups.
Try it yourself; take any regional's team list, divide it into three groups by team number (putting extras on the last one or two groups), then just split every two lines. Go to the FIRST website's match results for that regional and you'll see that you have just calculated the first couple matches in a simple Excel sheet. |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
*scrambls to figure out the time of that match to get out of class and watch it! ahha |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
:D.........all that needs to be said
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Well, the two teams that I've seen in action kick some serious behind scoring-wise were 100 and 254, and they're not under the Galileo division.
I can't wait to see how the G division pans out. I'm not going to speculate, since, as somebody else said, there's probably going to be improvements upon the robots for Championships, plus perhaps some team could just happen to come out of the woodworks and prove themselves. Like 675 and our bot, Gloria Machina. Just proposing. ;) |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
this seems to be the toughest division! i'm sure we'll have amazing matches here... we have the old powerhouses like 25, 45, 103, 229 and others... but we have good newcomers too... it would be a hard task to any team in this division...
I'm eager for that!! |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I'd never dream of doing such a thing! I don't know if you heard but 250 NEVER plays defense :rolleyes:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
2056 is the real deal. I will predict right now that they are the number 1 seed if the sorting algorithm stays the same as the regionals. If not, they will still be top 8.
I saw them at Waterloo and they were awesome. They can score like nobody's business and can get around defense in a flash. There are also a lot of high row scorers in this division which will be a plus for the Galileo representatives on Einstein. |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Here is some info for you guys to think about. I took the time to sort through some data. Take from it what you will
25 - Regional Champion (NJ) , Regional Finalist (UTC) 45 - Regional Champion (SL) 56 - Regional Finalist (NYC) 84 - Regional Champion (Philly) 103 - Regional Champion (NJ) 123 - Regional Champion (Pitt) , Regional Champion (Mich) 135 - Regiona EI (Indiana) 178 - Regional EI (UTC) 217 - Regional Finalist (ST) , Regional Chairmans (Mich) 229 - Regional Champion (LI) 250 - Regional Champion (Roc) 294 - Regional Finalist (SD) 341 - Regional Champion (Philly) , Regional EI (Philly) 379 - Regional Champion (Buckeye) 461 - Regional Finalist (IN) 488 - Regional Finalist (San Jose) , Regional EI (San Jose) 503 - Regional Champion (Mich) 540 - Regional Champion (VA) 604 - Regional Chairmans (San Jose) 675 - Regional EI (Sacramento) 703 - Regional Champion (West Mich) 816 - Regional Finalist (Philly) 842 - Regional Finalist (AZ) , Regional EI (LV) 903 - Regional Champion (MIch) 932 - Regional EI (Kansa) 1126 - Regional Finalist (Buckeye) 1251 - Regional Champion (FL) , Regional Finalist (Palmetto) 1382 - Regional Champion (Brazil) 1425 - Regional Champion (LV) 1450 - Regional Champion (Roch) 1504 - Regional Finalist (West Mich) 1515 - Regional Finalist 1555 - Regional Champion (In) 1583 - Regional Champion (Colorado) 1730 - Regional Champion (In) 1775 - Regional Champion (Kansas) 1848 - Regional Champion (GA) 1860 - Regional Champion (Brazil) 1902 - Regional Finalist (FL) 2056 - Regional Champion (Waterloo) , Regional Champion (GTR) 2119 - Regional Finalist (GA) 2169 - Regional Champion (WI) |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Uh wow..
I think that post^ speaks for itself, eh? Also, I think Paul has a great point. I was shocked when I found out they were a rookie team, their whole design and bot looks almost better than many veteran teams (not to mention the driving skill that they have to go with that bot). They'll be one of the people to benefit from the "Algorithm of Death," it looks like. |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
hey tim u forgot 379, they won Buckeye
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
Now on to sleep. |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I'm not sure winning a regional would be considered "under the radar" ;)
Then again, who knows, you don't make yourselves too public so maybe people won't notice right away. I posted in the Newton thread something about 148 (in my opinion, one of the best robots out there) and someone replied "who?" |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
WOW. I think that can describe it pretty well.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
Not to mention that they were the #1 pick and #1 Alliance Captain. As a rookie team. I believe the expression I'm looking for is WOW!!! But then again, I suppose coming from the folks at Niagra FIRST, this is to be expected.:D |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
AWESOME!
I didn't even know that 1902 was going to be there this year. I totally need to hear your chant. |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
work in progress: http://joelster.com/robots/v/2007_Galileo_Division/
Missing the following bots for Galileo: 103 135 279 326 335 353 362 604 618 752 989 1026 1057 1319 1624 1694 1775 1817 2024 2026 2237 2272 |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I just Hope 217,503, and 1126 get together. That would be the championship alliance :eek:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
about the bots?? we'll have a great competition there!! i believe that people will talk about it for many years after this season... |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
Here's Miss Daisy http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/28122 |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I'm posting one link with a video of robot #1860.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0BRuWPyiI We use a sensor to get de ringers, but in this match, the sensor did not function very well. Observe the delay to catch the ringers. We would place keeper, but wasn´t possible :D lol!... I think that our robot, is in the same good level of the others. What do you think about? :confused: |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
any body got pics or video from the detroit regional it would be greatly appreciated
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
somebody already knows the amount in percent of ramps, score and hibrids bots??? (in percent)
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Looks like we managed to get in the fun division. 250, Xcats, SparX, Division by zero... it feels like FLR all over again.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
Knowing this...will the matches still end up defensive? With so much great offense, will defense be a factor in the elims? And what does this mean going into Einstein? |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Yeah, isn't that crazy. There's five teams who recieved money from Xerox this year, and all of them are in Galileo.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Team 1694 is planning on being a really good defense/ramp bot. There may be jokes and snickers looming round the FL Regionals bout us...but we know what to do to improve our robot...and it will be a good bot by the time the championships are over.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Atlanta is in the same time zone and daylight-saving-ness as Ontario, right? None of the field webcasts are up (not even NASA TV), and that's really the only reason I can think of as for why.
Edit: They sure are the same time zone, where's my webcast :( |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
The Championship is next week. |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
I just saw all these what-to-do at championship threads as well as this and the 4 other division threads, and figured people were already there. I never once bothered checking the date. Now I feel stupid :( |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Quote:
I don't think we will ever hold Championships on Easter Weekend. Some Catholic School teams might not be able to go. Plus, the Georgia Dome is booked with the New Birth Easter Service. I'm not sure if that is webcast :D |
Re: Galileo Division 2007
and so... what did see? did you liked it?? what was the biggest surprise (positive and negative)??
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
I suppose my biggest surprise was that 503 AND 79 were both available when we got to the 8th seed. I was standing there looking down the line and thinking to myself "Wow, theres no way that they both are still around". I loved our alliance, sorry for the arm breaking in the finals guys, but we had a great run.
|
Re: Galileo Division 2007
Biggest surprise for me was my team, 1712. We came into this event really low key, and didn't expect to get as far as we did. We did extremely well in Philly, coming out 4th seed, but eliminated in the quarter-finals by 341 and 84's alliance. With such great teams as 25, 45, 103, 217, 341... and the list goes on, we had low expectations. We joked that we were going to be on top of everyone, but it didn't really sink in until the end of friday.
Ending the qualifying matches seeded 6th among some of the greatest teams in the world was one of the most exhilarating things for our crew of 12 that came to Atlanta. To go from being unknown for this years competition to making it to the Semi-finals on the Galileo field in than two weeks was something that we could have never imagined. It really meant the world to our drivers, our mentors, and everyone that was a part of our team. It was a truly amazing experience for all of us. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi