Chief Delphi - Nats Alliances

Page 5 of 9

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- Championship Event (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)

- - Nats Alliances (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56824)

Ian Curtis

14-04-2007 14:31

Re: Nats Alliances

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahecht (Post 616712)

Wow, upset in Newton. #8 alliance (190, 177, 987) just beat the #1 alliance (2194, 33, 1503) to move on to the semifinals.

That's only the second time since the introduction of seperate divisions that that has happened.

(If anyone's interested, the first time was on Galileo in 2005.)

EDIT:

Huh. Steve pointed out that it happened twice this year. So it's the second/third time. Why is this game so even?!

Bongle

14-04-2007 14:32

Re: Nats Alliances

Wow, I didn't expect 2056's alliance to be so ramp-dependant. They've double-ramped in every match I've watched.

Go canadian teams!

xzvrw2

14-04-2007 14:34

Re: Nats Alliances

Quote:

Originally Posted by iCurtis (Post 616724)

That's only the second time since the introduction of seperate divisions that that has happened.

(If anyone's interested, the first time was on Galileo in 2005.)

8 beat one in galilieo this yeat

Tottanka

14-04-2007 14:36

Re: Nats Alliances

that makes it 3 =]

Bongle

14-04-2007 14:37

Re: Nats Alliances

Simbotics lost their arm

...and their semifinal :( :(

Let's go 2056!

tkwetzel

14-04-2007 14:38

Re: Nats Alliances

Any update on Galileo? I am stuck watching the results update on FIRST's website, and the Galileo results have not been updated after the quarter-finals. Anyone watching know what is up?

Corey Balint

14-04-2007 14:39

Re: Nats Alliances

Curie: 1 and 2 won

xzvrw2

14-04-2007 14:39

Re: Nats Alliances

its 1-1 for 65 vs 703

and i onobout theother one......def boring time out

galilieo vs newton

Corey Balint

14-04-2007 14:40

Re: Nats Alliances

Ill make one post of who won all the Semis so its easier for everyone insetad of just massive posting.

Corey Balint

14-04-2007 14:41

Re: Nats Alliances

Curie: 1 and 2 won
Newton: 8 and 3 won
Galileo: 2 and 8 won
Archimedes: 2 and 4 won

Timeouts and third matches....

ScoutingNerd175

14-04-2007 14:58

Re: Nats Alliances

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey Balint (Post 616734)

Archimedes: 2 and 4 won

1 vs 4 was the first upset all afternoon on Archimedes, and it was a big one.

Corey Balint

14-04-2007 14:59

Re: Nats Alliances

Divisional Finals:
Newton
3. 1124-1592-1816
8. 190-987-177

Curie
1 1732, 67, 48
2 330, 910, 1270

Archimedes
2. 233, 71, 179
4. 386, 85, 107

Galileo
2. 173, 1902, 1319
8. 65, 503, 79

Corey Balint

14-04-2007 15:20

Re: Nats Alliances

Curie: 330, 910, 1270
Newton: 987, 190, 177
Galileo: 173, 1902, 1319
Archimedes: 233, 71, 179

ScoutingNerd175

14-04-2007 15:21

Re: Nats Alliances

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey Balint (Post 616740)

Archimedes
2. 233, 71, 179
4. 386, 85, 107

Alliance 2 wins.

dachickindapit

14-04-2007 15:23

Re: Nats Alliances

Did anyone see what the field fault was in Final 2 of Curie? I was watching the webcast and didn't see anything wrong.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:46.

Page 5 of 9

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page