![]() |
Designing Anodized Parts
What precautions should be taken or features added to a part that is going to be anodized in comparison to a normal part? Do bearring holes need to be made slightly oversize? what about tapped holes?
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
when a part is anodized the thickness of the finish could be anywhere from 1/32 to 1/16 of an inch, i would suggest sending out a part to the anodizer and measuring it when it comes back
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
In our experience it's been more like 2-4 thou over. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
How much time should usually be allowed for anodizing parts?
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
A machinist I know said for a traditional basic anodizing, the dimension added (outside the existing material) is so negligable .0002-.0003" that it doesn't need to be considered for most bearing press fits. If you are getting into hard anodizing, it is possible you could add a thou or two, and then it would need to be considered.
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Most colored (Type II sulfuric anodize, which is most common) should be anywhere from .0002 to .0008 thick.
Type I anodize (Chromic) is usually only .0001 and typically has no dye added. Type III (hard anodize) is typically thicker than the above two. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
What I'm concerned with are; bearing holes, holes for shear pins and threaded holes.
So, if the anodizing is for cosmetic purposes (Type II- thanks for letting me know Travis), the effect is negligible? |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
Don't worry about the threaded holes and the holes for shear pins or roll pins. Andy B. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
If your so worried about the bearing holes, why not just ream them out when you get the parts back? You cold mask them off or cork them.
-John |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
In my experience, masking is the best bet if you already have the hole to the exact dimension and location that you want it. You can sometimes mess it up through reaming.
In terms of lead time, if you're friendly with the company and they don't mind working hard for you, it can be done fast. For the central mass teams, Dav-Tech plating in Marlboro is really good. I've dropped stuff off at 8am and picked it up at 4pm. However, a typically company, depending on the color and batch size, will take 2-4 days. Also, if you're anodizing very small parts, make some spares. Tiny parts are known for getting lost in the tanks. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
To really save some time and frustration, especially if you haven't worked with anodize before i'd suggest reaming holes out after you get anodize back. That is IF you are very concerned.
We used A LOT of anodized parts this year on our bot 125 in technicolor We left our dimensions the same and experienced no real huge problems with items not fitting. If your very concerned i'd go with cutting your holes slightly smaller than your actual dimension and then reaming them out after, it guarantees a correct fit regardless, and no one will see it. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
But anodizing is really great, it makes the overall appearance look way better and more professional. I'm almost positive that it played some small role in the success of numerous robots this year. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
I'm curious how many teams that anodize their parts build their robot (or parts of it) first, then tear it down and send it off to be anodized.
I'd love to find the time and the resources to get our machines anodized, but usually I'll be hard pressed to take something apart once we've put it together and I'm a bit nervous about sending off parts that may not even fit together. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
Quote:
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
I love annodizing too, but doing it on such a time constraint is hard.
-John |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
If you talk to an anodizing company they can usually control the buildup +/- .0004. You just have the bearing bores machined oversize by the amount that the anodize will build up and you are good to go. The buildup (growth) on a standard hard anodize is usually in the range of .002 - .005.
This is what we had to do with the teeth on the gears. When I hobbed the gears we cut them .002 undersized to allow for anodize buildup. In the end everything worked perfectly. |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
As far as timing, our team built up our practice robot, then got everything anodized on the final one before any assembly. Obviously this isn't always a viable option, as you must be building a 2nd to go this route, but it worked out well for us.
The anodizing company we used turned some parts around same day for us, since we were pushed - although a couple parts were next day. All was donated, which was nice, so additional expense due to turnaround time wasn't a problem. I can't say much in the way of tolerance, our wheel bearing blocks didn't make it to anodizing. The tapered bearing blocks in our transmissions did get anodized, but the difference was negligible and didn't pose any problems. - Jeff |
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
I'm looking at anodizing a bunch of parts next year, and time really isn't an issue with the guy we're going with. Will the bearing holes have any issues if we're going to press fit them anyway?
|
Re: Designing Anodized Parts
If you really want/need to know just how much thicknedd a particular anodizing process adds to your parts, Travis Covington had the absolute best solution: Just ask the guys who are going to do it. THEY KNOW.
Alternative: Make a test coupon (a sample with some holes, slots, flats and stuff) and have it anodized, and measure ofr yourself what the difference is. In the real world, if your vendor doesn't know his process, you find another vendor. If that's impossible, then you run some tests and measure. Don |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:39. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi