![]() |
average score
along the lines of another thread about most points scored, what was your teams average score for your competition(s)
us, 1565, were the top-scoring robot at the greater Toronto regional. we scored an average of 22 points per round; the closest team was about 17 (if i remember correctly) |
Re: average score
i can tell you our average without calculating. 0!:(
|
Re: average score
Quote:
|
Re: average score
116s averages:
VCU (Qualification only)- 36.375 VCU (Qualification & Elimination)- 42.091 Galileo (Qualification only)- 64.429 Galileo (Qualification & Elimination)- 56.75 2007 (Qualification & Elimination)- 49.739 |
Re: average score
ranking is based on how well your alliance did....average points is how well YOU did.
and for sean, the average points are on the FIRST score sheets (i think on their web site) |
Re: average score
Quote:
The top average score for the 2007 season was Team 2056, with an average of 133.75 at the GTR. Team 330 was second with an average of 133.10 at San Diego. (These stats are qualification matches only. I have all the averages for all teams who attended the Championship. Roberto from Team 1114 has the averages for all teams in FIRST) |
Re: average score
Quote:
|
Re: average score
i feel dumb.....i was told our that that was our average points.......man, i feel stupid
|
Re: average score
At champs. Our average was 76.86 during Q.
Round 1 - 0 Round 2 - 32 Round 3 - 128 Round 4 - 8 Round 5 - 158 Round 6 - 158 Round 7 - 54 Best showing at Championships in the Huskie history. Quarters Round 1 - 138 Round 2 - 88 Semi Round 1 - 98 Round 2 - 40 Round 3 - 24 Final Round 1 - 0 Round 2 - 76 Overall average is 71.57 |
Re: average score
Team 254 had an average of 135.43 in qualifying at the Championship.
|
Re: average score
Sorry to bump an old thread, but what IS the interpretation of having an exceptionally high or low average ranking points score?
Here is my thinking: High ranking points score implies that you either tended to lose, but went down fighting, or you tended to win, but your opponents still tended to be effective. Essentially, your matches tended to be close. A low ranking points score might mean that you tend to lose and rarely score points, or you are a very powerful team that tends to blow out their opponents such that they never score any points. Edit: (Thanks IndySam) - Or you were a strong defensive team that always kept your opponents to a low score. Is this correct? I probably got the winning side wrong, since I'm unsure of the scoring mechanism for that. I watched 1565 at GTR, and they always tended to score 3-4 ringers per match, but were always just barely outclassed by their opponents. |
Re: average score
Quote:
If they keep RP as the tiebreaker I don't think we will build another defensive robot. You can build a great effective bot but the RP really handicaps you in the rankings |
Re: average score
Quote:
Malhon |
Re: average score
Gonna' have to go back to usfirst.org before september to check something, I see. :p
We were the top 5 scoring robots, scoring between 2-5 tubes per match, but because of lots of penalties in our alliance (don't like to point blaming fingers, but we followed all the rules, except for one mistake we made, and in the other matches we lost our other alliance team made a penalties) we reached last palce in the ranking, but were chosen for the elimination rounds. The qualification rounds average is 13.09 including the quarter and semi final matches, 20.94 |
Re: average score
25's Averages:
New Jersey Regional Qualification Matches: 67.5 Elimination Matches: 106.86 Overall Average: 85.87 UTC Hartford Regional Qualification Matches: 89.11 Elimination Matches: 34.75 Overall Average: 63.53 Galileo - Championships Qualification Matches: 103.14 Elimination Matches: 91 Overall Average: 100.44 2007 Season Overall Average: 79.8 |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi