Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   AndyMark transmissions at IRI (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=58215)

Madison 22-07-2007 12:38

AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Okay, so -- inquiring minds want to know -- were they there and who has pictures?

:)

sanddrag 22-07-2007 13:28

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Yes, they were there. I did not take pictures. Basically, it has the same mounting setup as the AM single speed and a similar housing too. It has 1/4" aluminum side plates. Instead of the sprockets inside, it has a small gear. There is one additional shaft with a larger gear making it perfect to direct drive a wheel. The shifting setup is a bit different too. The servo mount is very robust and looks like a good setup.

Madison 22-07-2007 13:48

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
It seems like Andy and Mark have made all the changes we were considering making on our own. I can't wait to see the changes and see if they'll work with our drivetrain. I'd sure be happy to avoid making the modifications required by the NBD arrangement, especially given that relative indifference provided by its two highest ratios.

chris31 22-07-2007 17:14

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
If anyone has pictures I would appreciate it if they posted them. I am curious as to what they look like.

Chris Fultz 22-07-2007 17:17

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
I saw them and they look really bad.
Heavy plates, thin gears, unreliable shifting.
I am not sure what Andy and MArk are thinking on this one.
I don't think any teams should use them in 2008.

HOWEVER, Team 234 will volunteer to use these "unproven" devices in 2008 and then report back to the other 1500 FIRST teams on how they do. Then, maybe you can consider them for 2009.

I know, I know, this is a big sacrifice for us to take, but we are willing to do this as a sign of true Gracious Professionalism.
It just seems like the right thing to do.



:)

Richard Wallace 22-07-2007 20:06

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Fultz (Post 635874)
I saw them and they look really bad.
Heavy plates, thin gears, unreliable shifting.
I am not sure what Andy and MArk are thinking on this one.
I don't think any teams should use them in 2008.

HOWEVER, Team 234 will volunteer to use these "unproven" devices in 2008 and then report back to the other 1500 FIRST teams on how they do. Then, maybe you can consider them for 2009.

I know, I know, this is a big sacrifice for us to take, but we are willing to do this as a sign of true Gracious Professionalism.
It just seems like the right thing to do.

:)

Nice try, Chris.

However, I think in the interest of statistically valid engineering test results, 931 will graciously undertake the same experiment.;)

chris31 22-07-2007 20:58

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 635893)
Nice try, Chris.

However, I think in the interest of statistically valid engineering test results, 931 will graciously undertake the same experiment.;)

Haha, I was thinking the same thing. We would be more than willing to test them for AM before they sell them :p

CraigHickman 22-07-2007 21:55

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
But seriously, does anyone who went have pictures for those of us across the country who would like to see?

I'm very curious as to how these gearboxes have been improved.

AdamHeard 22-07-2007 22:10

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 114ManualLabor (Post 635920)
But seriously, does anyone who went have pictures for those of us across the country who would like to see?

I'm very curious as to how these gearboxes have been improved.

They sound to be rather inspired by how team 45 used the GEN 2s this year.

CraigHickman 22-07-2007 22:14

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 635923)
They sound to be rather inspired by how team 45 used the GEN 2s this year.

For those of us out of the loop, how would 45's shifters differ from the stock Gen2's?

AdamHeard 22-07-2007 22:30

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
From this thread (and in person at champs);

Quote:

The drive base is somewhat modular. The guts of the drive module in the middle is an AM Shifter. We removed the sprockets, and added a gear and another reduction to the shaft that drives the middle wheel. Essentially, it's a direct-drive AM Shifter.

On the ends are wheel modules. These simply hold an axle for the outside wheels of the 6wd. Chains from the drive module axle power the axles on the wheel modules. We've got a neat-o sprocket/hub that works very well for this.

Since we have these "modules"... we have some options. We really like the 6wd setup, but if we had to do something else, we could.

Andy B.
It's similar to the gearboxes the "west coast drive" 4/22/60/254/968/980 have used over the years. I guess this opens up AM shifters to a whole new market.

You'd have to ask Andy or Mark to be sure, but I bet that's where the idea to expand the design came from.

EDIT: I have a question for AM as well... Is the output shaft supported well enough such that you could bolt the transmission to the frame, and mount a wheel on the output shaft that is cantilevered?

sanddrag 22-07-2007 23:04

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 635930)
It's similar to the gearboxes the "west coast drive" 4/22/60/254/968/980 have used over the years.

Similar yes, but with considerable differences. The 968/254 transmissions 06 and 07 transmissions feature larger gears for more reduction as opposed to an additional stage. Also, the 4/22/980/60 gearbox is a mesh shifting style; completely different. I suppose you were referring to the way they all face mount which is similar, yes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 635930)
EDIT: I have a question for AM as well... Is the output shaft supported well enough such that you could bolt the transmission to the frame, and mount a wheel on the output shaft that is cantilevered?

From what I saw this would be possible, although I am not sure if the output shaft I saw would be long enough to do so.

eshteyn 22-07-2007 23:10

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 635893)
Nice try, Chris.

However, I think in the interest of statistically valid engineering test results, 931 will graciously undertake the same experiment.;)

team 375 will gladly put the transmissions to the test, we will test drive components them using an SUV :D


No i am not joking!!

AdamHeard 22-07-2007 23:20

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sanddrag (Post 635943)
Similar yes, but with considerable differences. The 968/254 transmissions 06 and 07 transmissions feature larger gears for more reduction as opposed to an additional stage. Also, the 4/22/980/60 gearbox is a mesh shifting style; completely different. I suppose you were referring to the way they all face mount which is similar, yes.

From what I saw this would be possible, although I am not sure if the output shaft I saw would be long enough to do so.

I knew someone would call me on that... I was referring more to the concept/function than the internal workings.

Cory 22-07-2007 23:38

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 114ManualLabor (Post 635920)
But seriously, does anyone who went have pictures for those of us across the country who would like to see?

I'm very curious as to how these gearboxes have been improved.

The sideplates are now aluminum instead of steel. They no longer have the mounting flanges. Teams will have to either fabricate their own, or bolt them through the face of the transmission to a frame member.

They are also fully enclosed.

They will come standard with the option to either use servos or pneumatics to shift, as well as an encoder.

An extra stage of gearing is added to allow direct drive. As previously mentioned, I'm not sure that the output shaft is long enough to mount a wheel and sprockets on it.

Andy said that if you don't wish to direct drive, you can remove the third stage of gearing, and purchase an extended intermediate shaft from them (that would become the output shaft) and use them exactly like the Gen 2 shifter.

I wouldn't say that functionally they look drastically different. They just have some minor tweaks that make them more versatile, IMO.

GaryVoshol 23-07-2007 09:28

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Fultz (Post 635874)
HOWEVER, Team 234 will volunteer to use these "unproven" devices in 2008 and then report back to the other 1500 FIRST teams on how they do. Then, maybe you can consider them for 2009.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard (Post 635893)
However, I think in the interest of statistically valid engineering test results, 931 will graciously undertake the same experiment.;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris31 (Post 635901)
Haha, I was thinking the same thing. We would be more than willing to test them for AM before they sell them :p

Quote:

Originally Posted by eshteyn (Post 635944)
team 375 will gladly put the transmissions to the test,

Seems like you should have a rookie team test them as well, to check for ease of implementation and driving skills needed. I may be able to help out with that.

Chris Marra 23-07-2007 18:43

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
By the sound of these new features, will the Super Shifters be entirely replacing the Gen 2 transmissions? I had originally thought that they would cost marginally more for the added features like encoder mounts, but it now sounds as though they are essentially the Gen 3 design, and if so, will the price point remain the same?

Cory 23-07-2007 18:53

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Marra (Post 636060)
By the sound of these new features, will the Super Shifters be entirely replacing the Gen 2 transmissions? I had originally thought that they would cost marginally more for the added features like encoder mounts, but it now sounds as though they are essentially the Gen 3 design, and if so, will the price point remain the same?

The generation 2 shifter will still be sold. Andy said they will not be discontinuing any products, just so that people who bought them previously can still continue to use them in future competitions.

I believe he said the price has not yet been determined. I would imagine it would be slightly more expensive than a gen 2.

Andy Baker 23-07-2007 18:58

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 636061)
The generation 2 shifter will still be sold. Andy said they will not be discontinuing any products, just so that people who bought them previously can still continue to use them in future competitions.

I believe he said the price has not yet been determined. I would imagine it would be slightly more expensive than a gen 2.


This is all true.

At this point, we are simply trying to recover from IRI. Releasing information on this gearbox is not at the top of our priority list right at this minute, but we will release it soon.

Sincerely,
Andy

AdamHeard 24-07-2007 13:18

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 636062)
This is all true.

At this point, we are simply trying to recover from IRI. Releasing information on this gearbox is not at the top of our priority list right at this minute, but we will release it soon.

Sincerely,
Andy

Mr. Baker, you are a tease...

We're pretty much finished with our prototype design and reaching the point we can't change it. It's based on Gen 2s now, but I'm getting an itching urge to try to incorporate the Gen 3's. Is it reasonable to expect details and drawings within 2-3 weeks?

Andy Baker 24-07-2007 13:41

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 636187)
Mr. Baker, you are a tease...

Is it reasonable to expect details and drawings within 2-3 weeks?

Yes.

AB

Schnabel 24-07-2007 14:16

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Fultz (Post 635874)
I saw them and they look really bad.
Heavy plates, thin gears, unreliable shifting.
I am not sure what Andy and MArk are thinking on this one.
I don't think any teams should use them in 2008.

HOWEVER, Team 234 will volunteer to use these "unproven" devices in 2008 and then report back to the other 1500 FIRST teams on how they do. Then, maybe you can consider them for 2009.

I know, I know, this is a big sacrifice for us to take, but we are willing to do this as a sign of true Gracious Professionalism.
It just seems like the right thing to do.



:)

The only thing I can say is that they are real good! I should know!

Madison 24-07-2007 14:49

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
So, really, nobody took pictures? You all fail. :p

AndyB 24-07-2007 16:10

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
I stopped and looked and I had a camera in my hand actually, but me being myself, it never occured to me to get a picture...

Schnabel 24-07-2007 17:01

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Here is the best example of one I can find. Just the metal plate in between the metal plates is actually black.

=Martin=Taylor= 24-07-2007 17:29

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Schnabel (Post 636226)
Here is the best example of one I can find. Just the metal plate in between the metal plates is actually black.

But thats just a single speed! You just took the picture from www.andymark.biz! :mad:

So are they really that similar? Bolt hole pattern identical?

AdamHeard 24-07-2007 18:20

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII (Post 636233)
But thats just a single speed! You just took the picture from www.andymark.biz! :mad:

So are they really that similar? Bolt hole pattern identical?


to quote cory;

Quote:

The sideplates are now aluminum instead of steel. They no longer have the mounting flanges. Teams will have to either fabricate their own, or bolt them through the face of the transmission to a frame member.

They are also fully enclosed.
To me that sounds like the casing and plates will be very similar to the single speed.

AndyB 24-07-2007 18:35

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
It may just be because I haven't held a gen2 lately, but they seemed a lot smaller as well.

Kyle Love 24-07-2007 19:05

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
The main reason why they look significantly smaller is due to the fact that there are no more flanges on the long side of the gearbox. To me the asectics of this gearbox are more appealing, nice, simple and compact design.

Schnabel 24-07-2007 22:20

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII (Post 636233)
But thats just a single speed! You just took the picture from www.andymark.biz! :mad:

So are they really that similar? Bolt hole pattern identical?

Yes I took the picture from andymark.biz, and I did it on purpose because that is about the best I will get to the actual thing for now. The real thing looks very very similar!

EDIT: Here is an artist rendering of what I remember the super shifter looks like. The super on top just is to tell you it is a super shifter, otherwise, it really isn't on there.

Stu Bloom 25-07-2007 18:20

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
emphasis added
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 636187)
Mr. Baker, you are a tease...

We're pretty much finished with our prototype design and reaching the point we can't change it. It's based on Gen 2s now, but I'm getting an itching urge to try to incorporate the Gen 3's. Is it reasonable to expect details and drawings within 2-3 weeks?

Pardon me for changing the subject ... but ...

Prototype design of WHAT??

The 2007 season is over, '08 is months away, and it is the middle of the summer !!

Madison 25-07-2007 18:23

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu Bloom (Post 636500)
emphasis addedPardon me for changing the subject ... but ...

Prototype design of WHAT??

The 2007 season is over, '08 is months away, and it is the middle of the summer !!

We, too, are about to start working on a drivetrain. It's a great way for us to work out the kinks in design and manufacturing philosophy and to teach our kids about the work that goes into the robot at a more relaxed pace. We try our best to explain everything that's going on, but six weeks' time is hardly enough to really examine the form of function of each part and assembly.

AdamHeard 25-07-2007 18:31

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu Bloom (Post 636500)
emphasis addedPardon me for changing the subject ... but ...

Prototype design of WHAT??

The 2007 season is over, '08 is months away, and it is the middle of the summer !!

We took our 2007 season base that we developed with 687 and updated it greatly. We made everything easier to work with (whatever bothered whoever had to maintenence it) and maintain. We also made the frame easier to weld and more modular. Our final addition was incorporating off the shelf components such as AndyMark shifters to make production easier.

In terms of drive, all sorts of prototyping can be done during the off-season. Even if this base design doesn't get used for '08, the lessons learned from it will carry over. It also never hurts to have a fully assembled and running base to test with.

Gabe 25-07-2007 20:37

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Schnabel (Post 636319)
Yes I took the picture from andymark.biz, and I did it on purpose because that is about the best I will get to the actual thing for now. The real thing looks very very similar!

EDIT: Here is an artist rendering of what I remember the super shifter looks like. The super on top just is to tell you it is a super shifter, otherwise, it really isn't on there.

Someone please explain what I am seeing here. First, are the sides open or made of a black material? Second, is the gray thing sticking out of the side a metal holder for the black thing, which I assume is the servo. Third, does someone have a hand-drawn picture that they can show?

Cory 26-07-2007 13:48

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gabe (Post 636519)
Someone please explain what I am seeing here. First, are the sides open or made of a black material? Second, is the gray thing sticking out of the side a metal holder for the black thing, which I assume is the servo. Third, does someone have a hand-drawn picture that they can show?

The gearbox is enclosed with a black anodized aluminum box beam section.

the piece sticking off the side is maybe 1.5" aluminum angle, with a pocket milled out of it for the servo to mount to (with the exception that on the real thing, the shifter is located on the non-output shaft side of the gearbox. It also has an encoder built into the same area. The standard pneumatic shifting fixture remains in the same place.

AndyB 26-07-2007 14:10

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 636652)
The gearbox is enclosed with a black anodized aluminum box beam section.

the piece sticking off the side is maybe 1.5" aluminum angle, with a pocket milled out of it for the servo to mount to (with the exception that on the real thing, the shifter is located on the non-output shaft side of the gearbox. It also has an encoder built into the same area. The standard pneumatic shifting fixture remains in the same place.

When I looked at it, wasn't it just black plastic? There is no flanges on the gearbox.

Cory 26-07-2007 14:14

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyB (Post 636657)
When I looked at it, wasn't it just black plastic? There is no flanges on the gearbox.

Nope. It's definitely anodized aluminum.

Schnabel 26-07-2007 20:14

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Yes, that is my poor rendering skills at work there. Everything said above is true, I will redraw what I remember of it, but I'm thinking that everyone is going to have to wait for Mr. Baker to find time to get the real thing out. I just thought I would give a little teaser!

P.S. NO BOTHERING ANDY FOR A PHOTO!

Andy Baker 07-08-2007 22:35

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
There is a Super Shifter page on the AndyMark website. More details (CAD, assembly drawings) will be released within 5-6 weeks. Here are the key features and improvements:

An additional shaft, with 2 standard ratios (2.25:1 or 2.82:1) that would reduce the speed in addition to the current output speeds of the AM Shifter

An included encoder, US Digital model E4P-250-250, located on the final drive shaft

Common shift hardware used both for pneumatic or servo shifting, so choosing between one or the other is easier

An enclosed gearbox, much like our http://www.andymark.biz/am-0011.html, but wider (and a bunch more stuff included)

A 1/2" output shaft, with a 1/8" keyway and a 1/4-20 threaded hole on the end

Ability to mount 2 CIM motors (not enough room for a Large CIM motor)

1/4" thick aluminum side plates

The same gearing (mostly) as the AM Shifter in the cluster gear shaft and output gears

We have not set a price yet, but we are looking at $370 as a target. Keep in mind that 2 gears, 1 shaft, and 1 encoder are all being added. Also, we are debating about providing both the pneumatic and servo shift options for each gearbox. It is super.

Andy B.

AdamHeard 07-08-2007 22:40

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Can u give us the dimensions of the square hole pattern in the 4 corners?

Andy Baker 07-08-2007 22:52

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 638095)
Can u give us the dimensions of the square hole pattern in the 4 corners?

The side plates are 5"x5"x1/4". The mounting holes are 0.312" in from the sides, and therefore 4.376" apart from each other. Those 4 mounting holes are for 1/4-20 bolts. The 5"x5" extrusion enclosing the gearbox is 2.00" long.

Andy B.

pufame 07-08-2007 23:04

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Could we have the weight of the assembly as shown in the pictures?

Andy Baker 07-08-2007 23:17

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pufame (Post 638101)
Could we have the weight of the assembly as shown in the pictures?

The weight of this gearbox, without the motors is 4.6 lbs. This is 1.1 lbs heavier than the AM Shifter.

We have made no effort to fabricate lightening holes or features in the gears or side plates. That would take machining time, which would add significant cost, driving the price way over $400.

Three main places that teams could reduce weight in this gearbox would be to replace the aluminum extrusion with spacers (about 0.7 lbs), lighten the final drive gear and the cluster gears (about 0.4 lbs), and put lightening features into the 2 side plates (about 0.4 lbs total). Using these 3 methods alone, 1.5 lbs could be reduced for each gearbox.

As we prepare documentation for this gearbox, I will make more detailed designs regarding how and where to lose weight.

Andy B.

MrForbes 07-08-2007 23:35

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
that's nice!

and you'll be selling small broached steel #35 sprockets to put on the output shaft? hint hint hint

Andy Baker 08-08-2007 00:26

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by squirrel (Post 638105)
that's nice!

and you'll be selling small broached steel #35 sprockets to put on the output shaft? hint hint hint


Yes... and what if those 12 tooth sprockets were offered in steel and 7075 aluminum?

We already offer the 12 tooth sprockets.

The 7075 aluminum sprockets will be new for us. We are initially putting out a 12 tooth version, but may make 14 tooth and others if the demand is high.

Andy B.

Madison 16-08-2007 13:43

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 638106)
Yes... and what if those 12 tooth sprockets were offered in steel and 7075 aluminum?

We already offer the 12 tooth sprockets.

The 7075 aluminum sprockets will be new for us. We are initially putting out a 12 tooth version, but may make 14 tooth and others if the demand is high.

Andy B.

Ooh, can you make broached, 7075 Aluminum, #25 pitch sprockets next? Please?

Steel sprockets are killing our weight budget.

AdamHeard 16-08-2007 21:29

Re: AndyMark transmissions at IRI
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 638103)

Three main places that teams could reduce weight in this gearbox would be to replace the aluminum extrusion with spacers (about 0.7 lbs),

92511A085 and 92510A792 from mcmaster would get that job done real fast, and for a decent price.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi