Re: What would you prefer?
 

Not entirely - a team that builds a consistently good robot year after year is remembered. This is called reputation. By no coincidence these robots also tend to win, but not necessarily.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

In my case, I've forgotten nearly everyone that has defeated us in the finals, but have remembered everyone we played with.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

Personally, I would prefer the first situation. It would be a better feeling to know we built an amazing robot that will be remembered (even without winning), than a robot that won because of the others in the alliance. Banners and trophies are great and all, but I think the feeling of accomplishment from building an exemplary robot far surpasses it.

However, my team has never won a regional and I know it would mean a lot to the students and mentors. We've been in search of 'that blue banner' for years now, and winning just once would help give validation to our work, even if that year's robot was mediocre at best.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

I have a different, #2 scenario, because this one directly applies to us this year at the boston regional:

Your team puts up a good showing, managing to get around a 4-5 tube average. It seems that however hard you try, you just cannot seem to win a match. The "algorithm of death" seems to be taking its toll on you. You play matches against 121 and 1403. You find yourself near the end of the rankings. However, some good scouts have seen that your team has some talent. Come down to alliance selections, the top 8 is a little off. It seems the "algorithm of death" may have struck again with some very high numbered teams making the top 8, not necessarily for their performance, but because of their partners. Their scouting is still new so they see your ranking as low as sign of weakness so you fall all the way to the 2nd half of the 2nd round of pickings. The 3rd alliance spots that your available and snatches you up.

You go onto the elims...the quarters were fairly competitive, some solid defense was played, but the other alliance fails to score enough points to contend with your solid alliance. You go onto the semifinals where you find your team firing on all cylinders. Your alliance gets a row of 8, not once, but twice. Onto the finals. By far the most difficult matchup, you are playing the number 1 alliance of arguably the 2 best robots at the competition. Their 3rd partner may not be the best, but they certainly hold their own. You win the first match, lose the 2nd, and enter the 3rd. Your alliance gives it their all. With 3 seconds left your team manages to climb your partners ramp which gives you a 15 pt. lead, thus WINNING THE REGIONAL. Your partners thank you, knowing if they had a different partner they may not have stood a chance.

Now what do you pick, 1 or 2?

Re: What would you prefer?
 

I voted having our bot remembered, but I would rather have the team remembered. I would want somebody saying "look at those Robonauts" rather "look at Redline/ChainZilla" any day.

I would love to go to Atlanta for one reason, meeting people. This year, I went to Atlanta and had a good time meeting new people as well as the mentors and friends I had made over the past year on Chief Delphi.

I guess personally I would like to go to Atlanta, but thinking of my team before myself, I would want our team/robot remembered.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

For me this would depend on the teams history.

On our team I would perfer to win the regional because A trophy and a bannor always help when getting new students to goin the team. We have always had a hard time getting students so this would be my priority.

However if the team in question has either won a regional or mabey one or two other awards then I would rather the second cause it would help build the reputation of the team instead.

Then again I did enjoy going to atlanta so it would still be a close call...

Re: What would you prefer?
 

i don't care about winning or having the best robot i care about the time building the robot that the best part. fooling around man that was the best 6 weeks of my life pretty much ya

Re: What would you prefer?
 

I'll take either. That's coming from someone whose idea of a great season is just making the elimination rounds.

Over the course of our brief trouncing in the Palmetto quarterfinals, we got a crash course in what it takes to go further. That involves three teams who are all on the same page, planning and executing well. Even if the first two names greatly upstage the third, I still have yet to see any alliance bring home a banner without all three teams putting out. If we aren't as remembered, so be it.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

I definitely have to go with number 1. In my 3 years, I have experienced both sides of this debate. In 2005, we were the second pick of 56 at Montclair Mayhem. Sure my team was a rookie and pretty decent, but 56 could almost have won it without our help. Sure, winning the event was fun, but it wasn't until this year that I realized how much sweeter it is to LOSE in the finals as alliance captain.

Brandon mentioned the Boston regional, my team was the alliance captain of the 1st seeded alliance. That fact alone made my season. We made it to the finals, and it was a very hard fought 3 matches, but I knew that we got beat by the better alliance, and I was extremely happy with our outcome. We didn't get to go to Atlanta, but I figured my last competition ever went out on a good note, with some silver hardware.

Little did I know, that my season would have one last competition the very next weekend, at the Palmetto regional. Here it was confirmed to me that we did have a good robot, and we weren't just lucky at the Boston Regional. Once again we were near the top of the seedings, and ultimately in the end we were seeded 4th, and picked by the top seed, 1251. Once again we found ourselves in the finals, but sadly our partners were having some problems, but that didn't stop us from pushing it to 3 matches. In the final match my team scored 7 tubes by themselves, but in the end the 60 bonus points of the second seeded alliance beat us. I was upset at first, knowing that we wouldn't be going to Atlanta at all, but once again, the journey there is much sweeter when you are the captain or the first pick. This in no means takes away from the third seed in anyway however, because they still did their parts. It's just my personal opinion that wins are sweeter when your bot is doing most of the work. If I had to, I would gladly lose in match 3 of the finals all over again.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

I've been in both of those situations.
and honestly, there are good and bad things about both. (i'll try to sum it up as little as i can) Sorry i couldn't resist myself.

good:
-You made it a memorable year
-Took part in many notable matches
-Are known to others as a good team that year
-Well deserved exposure
bad:
-You didn't win
-No Atlanta ;(

good:
-Atlanta
-If the two teams recognized you as the best pick, and your robot had the qualities that would best fit what is needed on the alliance, then you guys deserve it as much as the other teams.
-At the end of the day, the teams picked yours.
bad:
-People will say your team "didn't deserve it". as much as you can say people aren't mean enough to say it, they do, I've been in that situation and it sucks after all your hardwork.
-and of course the whole "no one remembers what your robot looked/did" thing


In all honesty, i'd go for number 1 because you did the best you can, and despite that fact you didn't win, you're remembered for pumping out an amazing robot. You don't need to win to be remembered.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

I would prefer to be rememberd as having a great robot year after year rather than being a tag along. There are cases time and time again where great robots end up in the bottom of the pack simply because of strength of opposition or partners in thier matches. If we were in this position and were picked by the #1 seeded team and won the event it would feel good because you helped contribute to the win, and I would not view this as being a tag along or just being lucky.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

Winning a regional is great, but I'd rather rank second on my own accord (hey, even as Finalists you still get a trophy ;)) than to be a fifth wheel on the winning alliance. Consistently good quality (even if they aren't necessarily Champion banner winners) robots builds a team reputation, and that's something that winning a regional alone won't bring about.

And even if we don't make it to Atlanta? Well, the team usually applies for one of the open spots in the fall every other year or so. So usually every team member should get the chance to compete in Atlanta at least twice in their four high school years.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

This year we had a similar situation to #1. We had one of the best scoring robots at the Wisconsin regional and we were ranked first at the end of qualifying. Unfortunately, in the semis, we lost to 2 ramp robots and 1 ramp/scoring hybrid which was mostly a ramp-bot. Even though we didn't win the regional or make it to Atlanta :( , all of us are extremely proud of our bot. Thats why I'd choose #1.

Atlanta may be fun, but having a great robot is funner. :D

Re: What would you prefer?
 

Hmm... this is an interesting question.

We won the "Highest Rookie Seed" award even though team 2047 had a better bot than us, and we won the "Judges Award" for all the obstacles we had to overcome in order to finish the bot and make it to the regional.

I don't feel bad about winning the "Highest Rookie Seed" Award because our team made the best bot it could provided our circumstances (no mentors/teacher support, no place to build the bot, no way to make trips to get parts, and only a saws all and hand drill, etc.). Unfortunately, we had no idea that our lame 12" ramps and puny arm wouldn't stand a chance against any other team in the regional, but we got lucky with seeding alliances (we were paired with 111 numerous times) and made it to 5th place and became an Alliance Captain (we lost in the quarterfinals after 4 matches).

I loved the rush I got from being on the field during the elimination rounds, and I'm not sure if I would give that up if I had a chance to do it over. Plus, our team put up some good defense and our alliance brainstormed to develop some great tactics. On the other hand, I value the "Judges Award" more than the "Highest Rookie Seed," but I know my schoolmates feel the opposite. People would rather hear "champion" than "participant," and it hurts me to think about how much work everyone in FIRST has to do put in that goes virtually unrecognized by others if they don't bring home some metal.

As for recruiting new members to the team, I personally would not want kids on the team just because they want to be on a team with a winning record. I want kids to participate because they want to learn something new or foster their passion for robotics. If that means we will forever have a team of 12 kids or less, so be it. My theory is that it would be easier to recruit people to a well-known team with a line of great looking/functioning robots anyway.

People shouldn't be so quick to degrade the teams that "piggybacked" to Atlanta because they don't know how much work those teams had to put into their robot in order to get it how it is. That being said, I'd still choose number 1.

Re: What would you prefer?
 

Being on a team that barely had enough money to go to 1 regional, winning that regional and getting to go to the Championships has been invaluble to our team.

We did exactly the above (at BAE GSR), and it has gained us community awareness and support that otherwise would not have been possible.

You (the FIRST community) may not remember us, but the memories of that win will last a long time with our students and in our town.