![]() |
Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
Sorry if this question has been answered in a previous thread, but i have searched and i can't find my answer.
I heard and from what I read on ifi robotics' website one wire of the three wires on the (the red one) is not used because it provides power which is not needed in the system we use. So if this is true could I in the interest to keep the number of pins needed to a minimum just not connect the red wire? So in turn I would only need two wires per victor for the signal. |
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
Where did you see this information, i'v never heard that you only need sig and gnd.. but i agree it could be nicer to just have to run two wires
|
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
from Ifi robotics
General Notes: 1. The red wire (center pin) on the PWM cable connected to the Victor is an open circuit. There is no reason to disconnect this wire in the cable. The Victor does not source or draw power on this line. |
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
As far as I know this is true. Somewhere in the Victor documentation it says that it neither sinks nor sources current on the 5V line and does not need to be connected. I don't know if it violates any rules to just use two wires.
Edit: I guess it says it does not need to be disconnected. So not explicitly stated in the documentation, but still true that you technically don't need it. Also makes me wonder if the signal and power ground are internally connected or isolated (I suspect the latter). Bad practice not to use a separate signal ground line, anyway, I would think. |
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
The Victor does not use the power pin as the Victor derives it's power from the separate power input(s). Servos, however, still need the power input from that third pin. Don't forget that the center pin is tied to the 7.2 volt back up battery when the backup is connected.
|
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
Thank you all for your replies. Just to make sure, this means I can exclude the red wire in my serial connections. I just to have to make sure to include them for the servos.
|
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
I would suggest that you still put your ground wire for the PWM signal in your DB9 cable.... using common point grounding for signals like that when you have noisy compressors and motors usually introduces their noise into your small 5VDC signals that can cause wierd and hard to troubleshoot control problems.
Still, this would get you 8PWM sigals and one ground per cable for the Victor drives. Very interesting.... Did you also consider using CAT5 (Ethernet) cable? The RJ series connectors are quicker to disconnect/connect and are just as secure as the DB9 cables... but its pretty much a draw for which is better. It'll be interesting to see how this turns out.... -q |
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
Quote:
Unless I put 4 victors per CAT5 wire (if i remove the ground) and then have a CAT5 wire just for grounding purposes, which may workout that I can still give each victor its own ground. Thank you for the idea. Sorry i was kinda thinking out loud there. |
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
Quote:
So, if I were you, I'd stick with the DB9. Its a great solution..... think you might see some nifty connection boxes on 1024's robot next year... :cool: -q |
Re: Consolidating PWM's to one serial cable
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi