![]() |
Re: 2008 Wisconsin Regional
Quote:
|
Re: 2008 Wisconsin Regional
Quote:
Thanks Hills. If we REALLY need to solve the debate of shooters vs arms... I would hands down have to agree that this year, shooters tend to be the best in terms of hurdling. Arm bots tend to have a better end game. But again, I'll stress it for a 689th team, it all depends on which robot you are arguing. If you are arguing purely over if 1625 was the best robot there, I'd have to tend to agree. But if you are arguing whether or not 93 or 525 were the best robots at Minnesota, I would also have to tend to agree. Our list we had on draft day had a shooter as #1 but arm bots at #2 and #3. (1625, 2062, 93). I have to disagree with galesc's argument a bit. Shooters and arms tend to both break pretty equally and in terms of moving parts, they are about the same. The only reason that arms MAY break less is the speed in which its parts are moving (slower). If done right, both are very good. However, in my opinion, shooters have a much greater potential as not many arms have on-the-fly hurdling capability. |
Re: 2008 Wisconsin Regional
1675 is at number ten, and we pretty much only had a set of wheels o_o
I'm amazed, even though they are just numbers, hehe |
Re: 2008 Wisconsin Regional
My data was determined using actual scouting. Scouting was done by 2194 and 171. I have the data for every team if you want me to compile it all. This is only for Friday at Milwaukee for comparison.
Kind of interesting to see the differences. Power Rankings Code:
1625 1 45.6544Code:
Team Avg Pts/Match |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi