![]() |
**FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Greetings Teams:
The following sections of the 2008 FRC Competition Manual are now available for download here, http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc/content.aspx?id=452
Please be aware that the instructions for shipping your robot using the FedEx donation have been changed for 2008. This season, teams that utilize the generous donation will ship their robots via FedEx Freight not FedEx Express Freight (international exceptions may apply). Watch for specific guidelines in Section 4 and detailed instructions on www.usfirst.org. The remaining game-related sections will be encrypted and available for download on January 5th, 2008, after the Kickoff. Go Teams! |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Ladies & gentlemen, start your engines!
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
What no game hint? :cool:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Longest six weeks of the year followed by the shortest six weeks of the year!
I need a game hint soon.:ahh: |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
From "At The Events", a new policy to reduce wasted practice match time: (It think this is a really good change.)
Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
I like this whole filler line concept, but everyone always misses practice matches to pass inspection. Me thinks this "Filler Line" will be infamous for being extremely long in the later hours of Thursday. :ahh: |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
I have a feeling that letting out parts of the game until kickoff letter by letter is of Dave's doing to make us all go crazy... On another note I like this filler line deal and since my job [as controls] really doesn't get too messy for the most part, I am always trying to get the bot inspected. Now this is a kind of "incentive" for our team to actually get inspected sooner, preferably as soon as we uncrate!
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
"Purple pants! Purple pants!" said Einstein, while bathed in electrons. "Where are my pyjamas?" Now, just to be clear, that isn't the OFFICIAL game hint... but I can guarantee you that it is just as helpful at predicting anything useful around this year's game as previous hints have been at predicting those games. Be patient, kickoff will be here all too soon. Jason |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
Having a team miss a scheduled practice is the last thing that the your inspection team wants. As far as I am concerned, no team should ever miss a practice due to the inspection process (the only excuse being a serious safety concern by the inspector). I suggest that you talk to your lead inspector as soon as possible and explain what happened to your team in the past. He or she can be contacted via your Regional Director. If you had a "legitimate" experience issue, the LI and RD will make sure that it does not happen again. Note that I placed legitimate in quotes. Most teams miss matches because either they can not operate or they choose not to practice (it happens more often than you would think...). Regards, Mike |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
What I'm curious about is how the filler line will be handled at the Championship. With such a large distance between the pit and the field, the line will probably have to be on the Georgia Dome floor; unfortunately, that makes teams in the pit unable to ascertain the length of the line. So, will FIRST have a volunteer on the path from the pit to the dome to tell people the status of the filler line? Or maybe a little counter on the pit displays?
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
I think you misunderstood me, and I was over generalizing. It is not the fault of the inspector that we miss practice matches, but our own, becuase we choose to fix problems earlier in the day and work through a practice match. We could chose to wait, but we'd rather get practice in at the end of the day with a complete robot than get in more practice with a less complete one.
Also, as BAE is a first week regional, usually the first 5 or so practice matches average about 2 teams showing up. I would assume other teams are making the same choices as we are. My experiences with inspectors have been very positive. I can still recall fondly the first inspector we ever had, who told us we had to rewire a significant part of our ground wiring (we ran out of black wire near the end of the season :o). Managing to stay in someones good graces after telling them they have to rewire a robot, is a skill I'd love to have. :rolleyes: Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Having read through the sections, I am quite pleased. Lessons from 2007 were integrated, Chairman's and WFA winners get recognized in the first section of the manual, the awards section is the easiest to follow that I've ever read, and there aren't any head-scratchers. (Alright, so I wouldn't mind if FIRST standardized on the use of the title of "Regional Champion" instead of alternating with "Regional Winner" in half of the places...but that's another story.)
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
I, for one, am glad to see that FIRST has already clearly addressed the issue of machine tools in the pits and team-provided machine shops in sections 3.9.13 and 3.9.14, respectively (instead of leaving it to the second week of regionals as in 2007).
The gist of it is that bench-top tools band saws, drill presses, sanders, CNCs and the like are permitted, as are team-provided mobile machine shops if they provide their own liability coverage and power supply. |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
A suggestion regarding missed practice and excessive machining in the pits. I know stuff happens, but if every team tries to have there robot ready to practice by the final weekend of build, more robots will be ready to practice and be inspected right out the box at the regional.
PS I admit that my team has been a pretty big offender on this issue :o |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
So has my team. If you know you have Thursday to finish up stuff, you tend to guarantee that there will be stuff to finish up on Thursday. It's a kinda self-fulfilling prophesy... Mike |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
As has been discussed extensively in other threads, teams participating in Week 1 events deserve the same advantages as those who participate later in the season. Props to FIRST for making their power tool policy clear well in advance. |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
Quote:
"Champion" would be appropriate for teams that are the sole representatives of one event to compete at a higher level -- but that's not the way FIRST works. Each Regional Event can be represented by several teams at the FRC Championship Event, and winning the eliminations is only one way that a team can become one of those representatives. |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
It looks like Richard, Jenny, Mike, and the crew have all of the major points already pointed out in the released sections of the 2008 FRC manual, except .... pssttttttt ..... WFFA entries .... the Holiday season is for giving .... plan it now, get a head start ... the robot needs to be built in six weeks, but there's NOTHING prohibiting your team from working on honoring your special leader - NOW. Need some inspiration (and samples)?
Here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=45026 and Here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=54710 Don't delay. You'll hate yourselves when you get 'too busy" in February. For your reference, the 2008 Awards section is posted here: http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc...nt.aspx?id=452 Do it now. It's not about winning. It's about celebrating the finest inspirational examples we have. Namaste. |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
If you don't go to one of these events, you may be at a competitive disadvantage. See, the teams that go have seen the game, know how it is played, and have had scouting practice. Plus, non-functioning robots have a tendency to go to at least minimal functionality before the end of the day. You didn't go, your robot is still in pieces, you don't know what your chances are of doing well, and you don't know what everyone else is doing. If you don't want to reveal your designs, a practice robot could be sent. An example: in 2005, 330 sent their refitted 2004 robot, set up to mimic the real one as well as possible, to the SCRRF Preship Scrimmage. This did not reveal the true design, as the base was completely different. In 2007, the same thing happened, except that the robot sent was the 2007 practice robot, which, unlike its competition counterpart, did not have ramps. The ramps came out at the regional and were a key factor in winning. Also, some events have INSPECTIONS, which, while not official, can greatly help you get ready early so you can spend more time in the Filler Line. |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
***Off-topic***
Quote:
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Quote:
Oh, and the tube over the wall was legal--I hope that's what you called it!:yikes: And another fun moment from SCRRF Preship: 2003. One team had a telescoping arm that they would swing out during auto and then take a swipe at the bins. The arm would then be retracted and held in the rest of the match. After multiple cases of ref, MC, and resetters diving for cover, they were told to not use it until it was under control.... See, another reason for going--you can find out your chances of being thrown off the field for a safety violation! |
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
As a 2007 rookie team, FRC 2158, AusTIN CANS, invited the Austin area teams to a pre-ship mini-meet. It was very helpful. We were able to try out our ramps and see what worked and what didn't work. Hopefully, if there is one this year, more teams will attend and gain valuable experience - and - make new friends.
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/2008 FRC Competition Manual Sections Posted
Sounds like a well-rounded manual this year. I like the filler line insert. Should make for more productive fixit time before competition.
[Off-Topic] On the subject of pre-ship scrimmages, I've never heard of this ritual. Anyone know of one near the Cleveland area? [/Off-Topic] |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi