Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   2008 game confusion thread (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60690)

GBIT 05-01-2008 15:33

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
So the red robot in the beginning in the animation broke the rule?

akash155 05-01-2008 15:48

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Are we able to have two infrared controllers on our robot?

GBIT 05-01-2008 15:55

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akash155 (Post 668512)
Are we able to have two infrared controllers on our robot?

yes but you can only have one driver then.

jgannon 05-01-2008 16:03

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akash155 (Post 668512)
Are we able to have two infrared controllers on our robot?

You would need to consult the Parts Use Flowchart to find out about the legality of the part. Since it is a duplicate of something in the KoP, I'm inclined to say yes, but since it is not available as COTS, maybe not. In any case, because of <G49> and <R65>, you would still only be allowed to use four buttons on your remote.
Quote:

Originally Posted by GBIT (Post 668525)
yes but you can only have one driver then.

Are you saying that you can have more than one RoboCoach? I'm pretty sure that's not the case.
Quote:

ROBOCOACH: A pre-college student team member designated as the only team member permitted to provide external stimuli to the ROBOT from either of the two ALLIANCE ROBOCOACH STATIONS. There is one ROBOCOACH per TEAM.

GBIT 05-01-2008 16:06

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
My bad.

Ragnarokae 05-01-2008 16:12

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GBIT (Post 668498)
So the red robot in the beginning in the animation broke the rule?

That is what we are trying to decide. When the FIRST website gets the Q&A going, (and the server speeds up) we'll get our answers.

But we are left with speculation (as far as I know) until then.

tony.dalia.195 05-01-2008 16:14

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
For the extra Robo-Coach I believe that in the human demonstration Woodie had said that a team could have to seperate people doing the job, I'm having difficulty finding the rule to suppot this, but that may be why so some people are confused about the Robo-Coach rule.

Ragnarokae 05-01-2008 16:26

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
The definition of Robocoach is clear that there can only be one robocoach PER TEAM, (ROBOCOACH: A pre-college student team member designated as the only team member permitted to provide external stimuli to the ROBOT from either of the two ALLIANCE.
ROBOCOACH STATIONS. There is one ROBOCOACH per TEAM.), but why couldn't teams share robocoaches?

Anyways, what is the advantage of having two robocoaches? I would think that they would just interfere with each other.

tony.dalia.195 05-01-2008 16:30

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Well first I was just adressing where the confusion of a possible two Robo-Coaches came from, and this was the human demonstration.

But there is an advantage to two Robo-Coaches, actually there are a couple..

1.One of the coaches may have a better view and as long as they are communicating well only one would steer the robot so the objective could get completed faster.

2.With all the remotes, robots, obstructions, and distance in this game between the robot and Robo-Coach signals could be not found or misread by the robot, if you put a coach at each station you are doubling the chances that your robot will pick up on the signals more effectively.

Father Sarge 05-01-2008 16:51

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Hey what about the idea of shooting a metal plate at the trackballs?

jgannon 05-01-2008 16:54

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Father Sarge (Post 668622)
Hey what about the idea of shooting a metal plate at the trackballs?

If it is still attached to you, then it's still part of the robot, and would be a violation of the height rule. If it isn't attached to you, then it would be a violation of this:
Quote:

<G44> Detaching MECHANISMS - ROBOTS may not intentionally detach parts or leave multiple mechanisms on the TRACK. Violations will result in a PENALTY per incident. If an intentionally detached component or mechanism significantly impedes access to the TRACK or an ALLIANCE ROBOT, the offending ROBOT will be disqualified from the MATCH.

tanmaker 05-01-2008 16:57

Re: 2008 game confusion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Father Sarge (Post 668622)
Hey what about the idea of shooting a metal plate at the trackballs?

you can't shoot any object from the robot, beside the trackball itself. I'm not sure which rule exactly but i know it's illegal, and possibly against safety rules

auroraponce 05-01-2008 17:04

Hybrid Mode
 
How do you control your robot in the hybrid mode? Please explain the 3 by 5 cards. Reference:G49

Tomasz Bania 05-01-2008 17:09

Re: Hybrid Mode
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by auroraponce (Post 668651)
How do you control your robot in the hybrid mode? Please explain the 3 by 5 cards. Reference:G49

The hybrid mode allows the ROBOCOACH to select from 4 preprogrammed autonomous commands to fulfill a certain task. The 3x5 cards are to list what 4 commands your ROBOCOACH can perform from his remote (Probably for fairness purposes so you don't somehow execute more than the 4 listed commands)

Tomasz Bania

auroraponce 05-01-2008 17:11

Re: Hybrid Mode
 
thanks that was helpful!!!!!!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi