![]() |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
I think teams that quickly jump to mecanum and omni wheeled designs may regret that choice later on.
Yes, FIRST is discouraging defense, but do you really think with 6 robots on the field and 4 40" 10 lb balls there isn't going to be any collisions and interference? Knowing this is probably going to happen, I'd rather be the 6WD bot with nice high traction wheels than a holomonic (guess who is going to be knocked of course more....). Now, a crab drive is ideal; but we can't all pull it off. If there was ever a year to call Wildstang's, I think this is it. |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
I'm interested in seeing how the lower traction systems will fair considering the forces that will be on the robot when attempting to turn at high speeds.
I suspect that those robots that can maintain speed while turning inside of their opponents will have a distinct advantage in this game. Which is why we're looking at low CG wide frame and high traction. Oh, and just like NASCAR, I expect robots to "trade paint" ... so build 'em robust. |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Quote:
"Trading noodle"? |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Quote:
Sounds cool - but can I suggest you consider rear-wheel steering? Think about forklifts and how the ball moves, you might be better off. And if you drive the wheels you are steering you can still have a zero turn radius just like a forklift. |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
All the mentors for our team were thinking a car-like drive system this year. The students quickly and outright shot it down... maybe they're scared... :confused:
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Personally I don't think omni's or mechanum are going to be very good for this game. First off you need your bot needs to be fast and with omni's or mechanum systems you can't gear them too quickly or you won't have enough tourqe to strafe controllably and with how congested this game will get there will be times where you need some tourqe and traction to get out of the congestion. A swerve drivewould be great for this game if you have the weight for it with a beffy arm.
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Quote:
Check out my PDF I posted about 3 years ago, its got great info on these systems. |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
personally i like tank because i think its much more simple and would be easier to fix than an omni system
question: can you drive under those lane dividers?? |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Quote:
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
our team is thinking of using two high traction wheels in the front and free spinning omni's in the back because the closer to the ball your turning axis is the less the ball wants to run away while turning.
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Right now I like mecanums, traction wheel + partial omni, crab, and ackermann, but it depends on the strategy and how the manip is holding the ball...choices choices
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Quote:
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
I can't wait to see the first Ackermann steering robot in competition :D
|
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
i would love to see a team that has rack and pinion steering
just to see how they pulled it off cuz that requieres some serious changes being that the wheels have to be covered |
Re: 2008 and drivetrains
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi