![]() |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Eric, I guess you haven't seen how easy it is to self load a launcher with just a simple moving arm sticking out the front of it?
:) . |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Inform me if I am wrong, but by definition, HURDLING is defined in the rules as the trackball ball top being positioned just above the top rail of the overpass, or higher. Therefore, unless shooters shoot from that level (minimum height), they are not considered in the act of hurdling, even though that may be the end result of their shooting the trackball. Therefore, it would seem, blocking the shot is well within acceptable defense. At least, that's my interpretation of what I have read. :) :)
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Quote:
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
It's always true how you execute your design is the deciding factor as to how successful it will be. However 118 showed how easy it is to make a great launcher. We contemplated copying that when we saw it. It would have been easy to do (the launcher anyway). I'll bet a number of teams did. Why not?
However, all things being equal, this simply is the most efficient solution, mainly because of the clothesline factor. When executed properly you can't score faster with a mechanism that goes above the overpass for a period of time during the score. So how you get the ball off the ground becomes important, but no reason a shooter can't use the same mechanism an arm can. Yes there will be plenty of arms scoring faster than shooters, but that will be because of execution or techniques. But if done right I can't see how even the best arm (anything that goes above the overpass) could score faster than the best shooter. |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Yes, but the shooters can probably zip around the track and fetch balls at about the same speed as the arm bots. Also some of the shooters (specifically pneumatic ones) probably need the time it takes to make a lap to recharge the air tanks.
Should be fun to see what interesting ways different alliances can come up with to play the game! |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Personally the best robots this year will be a combination of both, we will see robots that can knock down, pickup, place, and shoot the ball. I am willing to bet that a couple of the top teams will build a bot that can do all of the above extremely effectively, hey we haven't seen 71, 111, 67, 254, 233, 1114 ect. yet!
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
I'm totally with EricH, i would like to see 2 arm robots and a shooter alliance
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Quote:
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
I think a third classification should be added to this thread...
Throwers. :) |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
just for discussion purposes hat if said shooter were capable of knocking a rather large mentor off his feet from the opposite side of the field, what would be your plan to easily block it. without getting you robot destroyed
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Quote:
Blocking a ball is a completely legit strategy.....but you better bet the team blocking is taking a risk by attempting to "stuff" you. Doesn't mean they can't do it though. |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Quote:
|
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Well,
1. Shooters can have mechanisms to knock the ball down. I know my team does and, 2. A hurdle at the end of the game rather than setting it back on the overpass is just as good, you just miss out on a couple points. I think effective shooters will dominate this years game. |
Re: Shooters vs Arms
Thank you hill i believe that will be the case as well
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi