![]() |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
I think you might find that in an area with no current FIRST teams that you will have difficulty "fielding" a team (of course that depends on population density)...
What I mean is, why even be selective? The more people the team has, the more ideas you get, the better your robot will turn out (if victory and glory is what your after). I come from a team that had 10 active members in our rookie year (only up to 14 active, with 6 or 7 that contribute to strategy/building). We physically don't have the man-power to apply for things like the Chairman's award since the work load gets to be too large for the students (especially with students who do other activities). The idea of becoming a business-like team is a very neat idea, don't get me wrong. But part of the reason that companies don't hire people is because they don't have the resources (money and space). People expect to get paid for their ideas in industry, but in FIRST, it doesn't work that way. All students want to do is learn about pneumatics and programming, and have some fun. If you had 800 applicants for the team, then you need to do some downsizing, but in general 60 people with a very gifted 20 people will outperform just those 20 gifted people. And especially if its the only team in the area, why deny students the opportunity to get involved in something so spectacular? If you give me a really good answer I will 100% support you in your venture, I would even offer to help (if I wasn't on the east coast) cause it sounds like an interesting idea. |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
I have a personal anecdote of sorts to add to the discussion. If our team had had a serious application process when it started when I was a freshman, I would not be on the team and consequently would not be majoring in engineering, would probably still be painfully shy and indecisive, and would not have made some of the best friends of my life. I'd be going to a local community college instead of looking outside the small area I've known my whole life.
You see, I wasn't interested in robotics when I joined. I joined because I had nothing better to do during the winter of my freshman year, and the pictures they showed me looked cool. That's about it. If you have a rigorous application process, you will certainly recruit members who are more likely to be productive - but you will also cut off some of the kids I believe you should be trying to inspire. The ones who don't KNOW they can love science and math. They won't apply if it's too difficult. The students you're trying to attract with the selection process will most likely come even if it's open for anyone; the ones whose lives you can completely change won't. Just my $.02. |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Any FIRST team based on the principles of exclusivity and winning at all costs goes against everything that FIRST stands for. Such a team would neither inspire nor motivate any student except the most selfishly ambitious. While your scheme may or may not produce a team that is successful on the field, it is not likely to produce many innovative engineers, or indeed anyone else besides mid-level managers. Rather, it would only educate participating students in the priciples of groupthink, kowtowing to the status quo, and a static conception of what constitutes innovation. Just because someone can sell an idea to a board of directors (i.e. an oligarchy) does not mean that they have anything useful to say. Such a team would only perpetuate passive conformity and suppress truly creative thinking.
We at 1418 have always strongly condemned any application process for our members. This has not only resulted in success on the field, but also in true inspiration. Our alumni have graduated from our program with a passion for discovery and a willingness to break the mold to find the best solution to a problem. Part of the reason for this has been our philosophical emphasis on content before appearance. A mere presentation of intent does not consitute a viable solution to any problem. No matter how slick a speil a student can put on a piece of paper, in the end it is the process of construction that defines the robot. This should be a learning process emphasizing collaboration and personal development before personal glory. In the end, you have to ask yourself whether FIRST is about shutting people out, or teaching, including, and encouraging everyone who is ready to put in the hours and has something productive to contribute. --Commander Rachek and 4throck |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
|
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Personally, I never would have known I was interested in (or talented at, relatively) engineering if I hadn't done FIRST. What you're doing is starting up an uber-team just for kicks, which is awesome for competent FIRST veterans still in high school who have gotten too fed up with their original teams to work with them, but completely skips over the whole teamwork-and-get-kids-interested-in-science thing.
|
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Its not about the robots.
If you have FIRST in your blood, then step up to the real challenge and cross the line to mentoring, coaching and volunteering. Be a referee or assist in field management, or robot inspector. Or start a team and guide it in the ideals of FIRST. But ask yourself, "Why?" and "Who am I doing this for?" If the answer has anything to do with "I like building robots" then by all means, build robots, but you can do that without FIRST. If the answer has something to do with "passing it on" or "sharing" or "inspiring", then let that be the foundation for your new team. Good luck! -Mr. Van Coach, Robodox |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
|
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Hm, I guess I should throw this out in a little bit more detailed form. Here's what my brainsession has come up with so far:
-Applications. The main purpose of this is to target specific subteams, and to simulate applying to a job. The acceptance rate would be around 100%, unless there's a special circumstance. -Business model for team operation. Students and mentors will have to present, and "sell" ideas for robot and funding to a "board" that will be made up of senior members and Mentors, and basically anyone who happens to be around at the time. Budget will be handled through part and funding requests, in order to simulate a corporate model. -Leadership. After the team is established, the students will elect a CEO type position. The goal of this position is to see that the teams goals are met. These goals are as follows: To educate students on practical business skills and engineering, and to Keep the team competitive. -Review. Like any company, the team will have review sessions. In these, they will go back over the season, or build session, and analyze what happened. Necessary changes will be marked, and implemented in the next revision or meeting. -Location. The team (hopefully) will not be tied to a single school or location. If a student from another team in a different state wishes to help out with the team, they can apply and "telecommute" their work via CAD, internet, and USPS. Just as in a corporate model, there would be limits to this. In order to be considered to be a satellite member, the student/mentor would need to offer some skill or asset that a local member cannot provide. The main goal here would be to simulate a business model. It wouldn't be a slow, mainstream business model, but more of one closely resembling groups like Lockheed's Skunkworks group; a highly specialized team of engineers working towards a common goal, with a structure surrounding them that allows creativity. |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Now that you've laid it out in a little more detail...
I kind of like it. I still think you should concentrate on college life, or get several other mentors to help. Applications: I think most teams that use them use them like you describe. Likewise for review. Your other ideas are kind of interesting. The location one kind of describes what I've been doing with 1135 this year. |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
The way I see it from the way it is explained above (which was the same interpretation I had before) Craig has a regular team, just more business oriented. More business and more advanced. By all means, I don't think his team's focus will be to have an unstoppable robot. I think its to have a more structured corporate environment (which I think could be something good for college teams).
Hope you keep going for it Craig:) |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
Our CC offered a LEGO robotics class to MC students, but it was not as successful as hoped, because the students seemed to lack motivation to do anything, including robotics. When they were done, few had a sufficient grasp of robotics to program the robot to do more than move forward. In contrast, local elementary school students ate up the same material and performed spectacularly at a local FLL tournament. |
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
|
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Elite (invite only) FIRST teams
Quote:
Let us know if we can help you somehow. Stick with it... Remember... be quick, be quiet, and be on time.... wink You have help from Seattle if you need it.... Good luck in your new venture!! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi