Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic) (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66234)

Aren_Hill 25-03-2008 07:56

pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 

Peter Matteson 25-03-2008 07:59

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
You're the only other team I've seen do welded tube construction wheels. I thought we were alone with that because everyong else seems to hog them out of a billet.

wowmuffin 25-03-2008 18:04

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Wow... those are beautiful. Are those wheels driven throught a screw gear or am I not understanding how the motor drives those wheels? :confused:

A_Reed 25-03-2008 18:26

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wowmuffin (Post 724774)
Wow... those are beautiful. Are those wheels driven throught a screw gear or am I not understanding how the motor drives those wheels? :confused:

It is done by changing the axis of rotation with a set of miter gears.

Nice setup, saw you guys on the MWR webcast, good looking robot.

thefro526 25-03-2008 18:32

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
I like how you used snap-rings instead of collars. That has to save a lot weight.

Aren_Hill 26-03-2008 00:20

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Matteson (Post 724399)
You're the only other team I've seen do welded tube construction wheels. I thought we were alone with that because everyong else seems to hog them out of a billet.

these are faster to make and are also most likely lighter and stronger in the places the force is applied.
its really easy to just waterjet the sideplates and weld them on, these wheels are 1.75" wide


Quote:

Originally Posted by thefro526 (Post 724794)
I like how you used snap-rings instead of collars. That has to save a lot weight.

I LOVE SNAP RINGS!!! lol also the custom 7068 hex axles....not overkill at all...

SgtMillhouse648 26-03-2008 00:27

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Yes, I loved your guy's setup when you brought over the spare module to compare to ours at MWR. It is a real slick setup, not to far from ours. Great job on the wheels, and I absolutely love the sprockets you guys use to steer. That is an amazing setup on that. Hawging out the middle of hte sprocket also has to save a ton of weight, and I liked the slotted holes in the sprocket (if I remember right) to fine tune each wheel's tracking before you went out onto the floor.
Malhon

Chris Herold 26-03-2008 02:24

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Hey, I like it. They look great! Swerve drives are for me as a rookie pretty impressive just because of their advantages. I'll probably test my cad abilities during the off-season by designing one myself... I'll see but it's a nice piece of metal!

Chris

Peter Matteson 26-03-2008 07:22

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 725043)
these are faster to make and are also most likely lighter and stronger in the places the force is applied.
its really easy to just waterjet the sideplates and weld them on, these wheels are 1.75" wide

Same reason we do wheels out tube and plate welded together.

AdamHeard 26-03-2008 10:01

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Matteson (Post 725125)
Same reason we do wheels out tube and plate welded together.

How easy is it to hold the plates and tube concentric while rounding?

If it is just standard Al tube, how thick are the walls and how true to round is the outer surface?

Peter Matteson 26-03-2008 10:07

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 725181)
How easy is it to hold the plates and tube concentric while rounding?

If it is just standard Al tube, how thick are the walls and how true to round is the outer surface?

We cut a relief pocket in the plate so that it over hangs the tube and tube literally snaps into the plate. This gives us wheels as close to concentric as possible to make. I'll dig up some pictures and grab a few of the evolution of the design when I'm at the shop today so you can see what I mean.
Pete

Edit:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/31104?
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/31105?
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/31102?
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/31103

Pictures now up.
End Edit

Aren_Hill 26-03-2008 12:09

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 725181)
How easy is it to hold the plates and tube concentric while rounding?

If it is just standard Al tube, how thick are the walls and how true to round is the outer surface?

We just used 4" o.d. 1/8th wall tube, and waterjetted the sideplates, due to the nature of a waterjet it puts a slight taper on things so when i had it make a
3.75 o.d. disc it pressed right into the side of the tube and held itself there solidly while it was welded.

they're as concentric as you'll ever need for wheels.

sdcantrell56 26-03-2008 12:54

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
How are you keying the wheel to the axle. I'm planning on using that type of wheel next year and just looking to compare ideas

A_Reed 26-03-2008 14:12

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
how is the lower plate supported? I know it used as a bearing surface, but it is sandwiched between plates or riding on small ball casters. I have always wondered how this work with swerve modules, I understand the rest of it but the lower support plate is the only gap in my limited knowledge of drive systems(I don't go into the kinematics...yet).

hillale 26-03-2008 14:30

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by A_Reed (Post 725282)
how is the lower plate supported? I know it used as a bearing surface, but it is sandwiched between plates or riding on small ball casters. I have always wondered how this work with swerve modules, I understand the rest of it but the lower support plate is the only gap in my limited knowledge of drive systems(I don't go into the kinematics...yet).

The lower plate isn't necessarily a support plate, just a bearing surface like you said. Due to the nature of friction, it does a little support, but mainly it just rubs against flat plastic patches (lubed up to reduce friction) on the frame to aid in steering the modules. The face of the contact between the plastic and the plate is purely vertical. No horizontal contact is made between the plate and the frame. It is welded, in the corners, to the square tube that makes up the vertical body of the module.

Aren_Hill 31-03-2008 01:04

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by A_Reed (Post 725282)
how is the lower plate supported? I know it used as a bearing surface, but it is sandwiched between plates or riding on small ball casters. I have always wondered how this work with swerve modules, I understand the rest of it but the lower support plate is the only gap in my limited knowledge of drive systems(I don't go into the kinematics...yet).

the bottom disc is simply supported by 4 tangential pieces of UMHW (ultra high molecular weight) plastic, that we keep white lithium grease on all the time to keep it slick. Rollers are more efficient but take longer to install and are heavier

Un Luchador 31-03-2008 03:21

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
With such an effective drivetrain, it's no wonder you guys went undefeated at Colorado. I love the way you guys keep the robot chassis facing forward through the match, but still have the swerve function to put you back into position. That's very innovative.
Keep up the hard work and military-like competing guys.

Jimmy Cao 31-03-2008 06:29

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
That module looks very simular to our initial idea, except we were putting the motor/transy inside the module itself.

It's very nice looking =D

hillale 31-03-2008 09:59

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lostmage333 (Post 727572)
That module looks very simular to our initial idea, except we were putting the motor/transy inside the module itself.

It's very nice looking =D

That's what we did last year, we had a cim mounted vertically through a dewalt on each of the modules. This coaxial design made maintenance much easier (though it has gone through 3 regionals and hasn't broken once). Here is a pic of our underbelly, http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/28596. I guess we don't have a closeup of the module from last year.

Aren_Hill 15-04-2008 13:31

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
This guy weighs in at 2lbs 14oz and i coulda taken a couple more ounces out of the steel sprockets. Lighter than last years

lukevanoort 15-04-2008 16:42

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 737477)
i coulda taken a couple more ounces out of the steel sprockets. Lighter than last years

Have you thought about going to aluminum drive sprockets to save a touch more weight?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 737477)
This guy module weighs in at 2lbs 14oz

Is there a girl module? ;)

CraigHickman 15-04-2008 17:37

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill (Post 737477)
This guy module weighs in at 2lbs 14oz and i coulda taken a couple more ounces out of the steel sprockets. Lighter than last years

Hm, you should switch to Kevlar belting and aluminum pulleys. Then this setup would be truly frighteningly light. Out of curiosity, how many teeth does your steering sprocket have? I'm currently designing a bottom support crab, so I can finally post one that doesn't get hit with the "you're not supporting it right" complaint.

Aren_Hill 15-04-2008 17:38

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Yes i have but during the season i was too busy to find a supplier or someone to have them made.

Elgin Clock 22-07-2008 16:58

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Aren, do you have a white paper on this, or at least a picture of the other side of this assembly showing the bevel gears?

I got to see this up close at IRI, & was very impressed.
Not only did it perform great on the field, but it was relatively lightweight for what it consists of.

I'm trying to convince my teammates to experiment with as many drive trains as possible over the summer with our upcoming test chassis, & want to show them this one as a great example of swerve assembly.

Aren_Hill 22-07-2008 17:11

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
I myself do not own a camera, and if i did wouldn't have time to take pictures.
The module structure (alum parts) is almost all waterjetted parts, then welded onto a 3x3x1/8th wall tube that had bearings holes CNC'd into it.

it will have some revisions for next year if we continue to do swerve, such as better bearing support at the top. (right now 1/2" bearings are taking the thrust load....). I'm considering copying 148's wheels so we dont have to worry about retreading and steering the wheels would be easier

roboticWanderor 22-07-2008 19:14

Re: pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Matteson (Post 724399)
You're the only other team I've seen do welded tube construction wheels. I thought we were alone with that because everyong else seems to hog them out of a billet.

418 has been doing them for years, exept we use 1"x1/4" stock to make spokes instead of using plate. then we speed hole them to make them even lighter.
here is a cad of them i don't have a good picture.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi