![]() |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
1251, 179, 16(if thats possible), 2056, 968, 1717, 1625, 1086 and im sure i could think of more, but those were the ones on the top of my head:D |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
If they fix their air problems (it runs out quickly) then I'd put up 375 as well. Their shooter is very similar to 103's if anyone saw it. Also 395, you can't deny that 2TrainRobotics is a strong robot. |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
If any of the teams mentioned above are sleepers, then I highly disagree with your definition of a sleeper. Those are all well known teams, most with at least one regional championship, who all paly well. The true sleepers will only emerge after competition begins, because they either changed their strategy or improved their robot enough that their relative lack of reknown befor the competition will be gone by alliance selections.
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Yeah, those teams are pretty well known by other teams, especially 1717!
Some sleepers in my mind: 107, 291, 326, 337, 343, 357, and 573. Just of the top of my head. Half have one regional competitions, but I think that they still go relatively unnoticed. |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Heck, we all just beat up on all those creampuff teams out here. Not like those midwestern folks with their super elite teams. 987, 330, 39, 1717, 968, 254... nothing to see here. Those guys couldn't hold 1114's jock. No need to worry about them in Atlanta. They can't hang with the big boys ;) |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
In all seriousness, I just can't wait for divisions to be released. That's when true winner predictions begin. |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
I've enjoyed the privilege of attending Florida, GTR, and GLR. You're all correct, awesome bots. I have to say, however, Watch for HOT. Cannot be considered a sleeper. Their Autonomous is already elegant and they've got way more tricks up their sleeves.
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
really I think it could be split back into the arm vs shooter arguement (please don't do it though) but there are really strong shooters I could see win (16 and 39 are my favourites) some strong arm bots (330, 121 (they averaged 5 hurdles I think, maybe 4), 217 ) and some strong hybrids (1114, 254) all in all, anyone of those could win, anyone of those against one another would prove to be a very fun match to watch.
That being said, I still think 1114 will win, and I would love for them to win, but I would also love 121 to win because we shared their roller claw idea (they helped us with that video) and I would also love 16 to win, because flip bots are my favourite type of bots of all time, that and their roller is crazy, and they shoot really well. So I guess what I'm saying is 1114, 121, 16 FOR THE WIN :D:D:D EDIT: John Norris I also hit 610! thought I would share and give you more glory |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
I'm gonna call it now for real. The X-Factor on Einstein will be a 3rd bot who can knock, has at least 3 line hybrid and doesn't get penalties.
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
What do you guys consider being a top number of hurdles for an arm bot (since it was brought up) but please don't go into the arm vs. shooter thing. Please.lol
edit: arm or lifter- average number of hurdles. Above, someone said that 330 and like 217 have 4-5 average. So what do you think is the best for an arm bot? |
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
|
Re: Predictions to win 2008 Frc Championship
Quote:
I think the teams that have a really good coordinated hybrids can pull off wins before the match even begins lol |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi