![]() |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
i think we now know why its no wonder that whenever 1114 and 2056 got together, there were a lot of points scored:ahh:
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
I know it could be challenging to set up the program, but it would be a great tool Thank You |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Thank You!
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
It looks like you are missing 858, 1254, 2335, 2337, and 2604. Looks like 4 of them all went to West Michigan. |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Anywho, find attached an XLS file detailing: -A team's regional count* (I may have missed some regionals due to formatting funniness) -A team's last OPR -A team's last regional -A team's best OPR (if it differed from their last, which didn't happen much) -A team's best regional Note that some regionals still don't have all their results up, so for those regionals (Peachtree and one other) the OPR will not be 'accurate'. oprChamps has only teams attending championships. oprAll has all teams. |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Now includes western michigan regional. oprChamps now includes 333 teams, just like it should. |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
Edit: I have discovered you attended pittsburgh and glr, and here is my theory: -The new listing only ranks you based on your performance per-regional. The old listing was based on a team's total performance over all of its matches throughout the season. Through the magic of mathematics, your team looked a little better when the overall performance of every team was factored in. So just like teams like 1114 who improved massively regional to regional get a big boost in the new listing, other teams can actually suffer. Although keep in mind that according to the best OPR listing, you're 115th, because your performance at pittsburgh was better than that at GLR. |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
I like the new OPR of the last regional attended, due to the fact that it is more indicative of a team after adjustments to driving, strategy and robot features were made after attending more than 1 regional.
Our biggest feature change was moving our pneumatic piston to our claw which pops balls over the overpass once our claw opens. We sacrificed popping balls during hybrid and moved it to our claw instead. With increased speed, hybrid adjustments, and improved driving, we went from doing 1 or no lines in hybrid to now being able to consistently doing 4, with much greater speed, and hurdling capability. Its too bad it took 3 regionals to figure it out, but at least we will be much better prepared for CMP. On another note, its funny how us and our favorite Hawaiian teammate are ranked next to each other, off by a few decimal points.:D |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
I just got an interesting idea.
I have scouting data for matches from Friday at the Wisconsin Regional for every team. However, the power rankings are for every match. Could someone please figure out the power rankings using only Friday's Wisconsin matches for comparison? |
Re: Offensive Power Rankings for 2008
Quote:
Code:
Team One Last OPR |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi