Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Championship Event (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   2008 Final Championship Divisions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66767)

hillale 10-04-2008 00:15

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nawaid Ladak (Post 734005)
i think gali will have the best matches, but in the end, newton will win it.... as much as i hate to say that, all the key stats that i look at say that.... look in the OPR thread for more info

God, I hope you're right. I'm just glad that with how stacked Galileo is that only 2 of the powerhouses will make it out alive to continue on to Einstein, evening the field a little. (unless one of them somehow makes it around to a 2nd round pick). There are going to be uber-strong alliances coming out of every division. Now it's time to go crazy waiting for the match list!!!! Only 6 more days until I get to head down!!!!!

George A. 10-04-2008 00:49

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Ok we got some going earlier...but here's the question

Which 3 team alliance would you like to see represent your division on Einstein?

A couple guidelines:

1) Of course we'd like to see our own team up there, but leave that to other people to decide. Vote for someone else, spread the love :p

2) Make them "Realistic". What I mean, we all know that 365, 1124, and 1024 aren't going to be on an alliance together (no offense to these teams...but there's no way that one of those three will be around for the second round).

Any thoughts?

Guy Davidson 10-04-2008 00:52

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
A 987/1124/66 alliance would be very, very scary. 365/1024, 27/71, and 365/525 would also be very strong combos.

EDIT: Above is for Archi. For Galileo, wow. This is almost impossible. As well as I'd think we'd complement most alliances as a third member, I'll refrain for now. Any combination of two of 1114/330/217/254/103/25/469/1717/195 scares me. And to think, it's likely we'll see 4 of those in the eliminations :O And, I haven't mentioned 121, 494, 70, 40, 1629, 343, 1540, ... Wow. What a division. If 148 is still around on the third round, it would make a valuable 3rd alliance member. 980 also showed they know what they're doing as a complement to two hurdlers, as did 84.

Akash Rastogi 10-04-2008 01:08

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Don't want to be cocky and put up our own team George, but I honestly think a 1024/27/11 alliance is a possibility based on the consistency of our performance there.

Again, not to be cocky or anything.

+$0.02

edit: I would also love to be allianced with 71 just so I could say that we were once alliance with the Beast. 555 and 816 are also both up there for 2nd round of selections. And I would obviously love to be part of an Exploding Bacon alliance :D

seraphim33 10-04-2008 04:28

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
111,233,2056.........newton

fredliu168 10-04-2008 06:46

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
I know this is a pretty common prediction, but:

1114/217/148

Tom Bottiglieri 10-04-2008 08:26

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Posted all of the division event pages:
http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv/

Nawaid Ladak 10-04-2008 11:12

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by seraphim33 (Post 734076)
111,233,2056.........newton

lets be serious here, who's going to be the second pick

i think were going to see some pink patriots coming out of the newton division...my research sems to say something diffrent though, it's telling me one of these two teams will head an alliance with 1625 and 1806 and they wil narowly win the division

gali teams will be tested and beat up but yet the SimChicken's will emerge victorious. their alliance partner could be one of the following teams, 8, 384, 148, or 84... maybe even more teams, depends on if those teams in the "more" category are worrying less about their robot and more about their drivers.

curie i don't want to sound mean here but this is by far the SOFTEST division of the four. i like 191 advancing though

archie: all i can say is, watch out for the beast. i think they will be a very strong 2nd round steal come selection time.

Corey Balint 10-04-2008 11:26

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nawaid Ladak (Post 734210)
lets be serious here, who's going to be the second pick

i think were going to see some pink patriots coming out of the newton division...my research sems to say something diffrent though, it's telling me one of these two teams will head an alliance with 1625 and 1806 and they wil narowly win the division

gali teams will be tested and beat up but yet the SimChicken's will emerge victorious. their alliance partner could be one of the following teams, 8, 384, 148, or 84... maybe even more teams, depends on if those teams in the "more" category are worrying less about their robot and more about their drivers.

curie i don't want to sound mean here but this is by far the SOFTEST division of the four. i like 191 advancing though

archie: all i can say is, watch out for the beast. i think they will be a very strong 2nd round steal come selection time.

Curie is the softest, yes. But if two of 16/33/67/118 get together...watch out.
Archi: NO way 71 slips to the second round. They are top 4 in the division, with 27, 1024, and 1124 rounding out the other 4.
Newton: 2056 is good. But not as good as everyone is making them out to be. I've got 7 teams better than them; 968, 233, 1625, 111, 175, 39, 20
Galileo: SimPoofs would be much better than SimChickens in my opinion.

Guy Davidson 10-04-2008 11:55

Re: 2008 Final Championship Divisions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey Balint (Post 734217)
Archi: NO way 71 slips to the second round. They are top 4 in the division, with 27, 1024, and 1124 rounding out the other 4.

I would add 987 to your top teams. They are around the level of those four teams you mentioned. I also wouldn't sleep on 93, 357, and 365, as they know what they're doing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey Balint (Post 734217)
Curie is the softest, yes. But if two of 16/33/67/118 get together...watch out.

Yeah, Cure is a bit softer. Seeing as it is not as stacked, I wouldn't be surprised to see finals with all four teams you mentioned, if the seeding order allows it. I'd also watch out for 45, 100, 108, 126, 191, 368, and 395. With relative lack of juggernauts in this division, look out for the above teams to make a difference, especially of the top four teams have trouble getting together for eliminations.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey Balint (Post 734217)
Galileo: SimPoofs would be much better than SimChickens in my opinion.

I'm not sure about that. I am sure, though, that both would be scary. This division is insanely stacked - look for the seeding order to matter less (as each alliance should be able to grab two solid hurdlers) and the scouting (especially for the third partner, but also the second). There are more solid hurdlers in this division than you could shake a stick at: 25, 40, 70, 103, 121, 195, 217, 234. 254, 330, 343, 384, 469, 494, 1114, 1629, 1717, 2065. Obviously these teams are not all equal, but all them can put up hurdlers in a hurry. Look for some scary combinations to be formed in the first round of the alliance selections, and for alliance to flesh out their alliances with a solid third bot, such as 148, 980, 84, 48, or 8.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey Balint (Post 734217)
Newton: 2056 is good. But not as good as everyone is making them out to be. I've got 7 teams better than them; 968, 233, 1625, 111, 175, 39, 20

I am also not as high on 2056 as others are. They are good, no doubt about it. But I want to see t hem compete against the other top contenders Corey mentioned, particularly 233, 968, and 39, before I make any more judgment of their skill. I also wouldn't sleep on 79, 179, and 1574 here. They could all make some noise.

I can't wait for Atlanta.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi