![]() |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
I have posted a paper with YouTube links to the video clips that I shot of the Elimination & other selected matches at the Los Angeles Regional.:cool:
You can also find them by searching YouTube for “FIRST Robotics Los Angeles” or by team number, using the Chief Delphi standard to prefix it with “frc”. For example: “frc330”, “frc1717”, “frc980”, etc. Or just go to: www.YouTube.com/GaryWHedge |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Video from the Microsoft-Seattle Regional has not been posted on Blue Alliance, but team video of some of the elimination rounds has been posted on our team site at
http://tshs.tahoma.wednet.edu/sites/robotics/ Enjoy! |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
This thread has been very entertaining to watch. There also seems to be a lot of chest pounding :ahh: and politicking going on. Some of you make it appear that the other divisions should just stay home.
Spend some time on other threads talking about other alliances and you'll obviously get a different perspective about everyones chances. My two observations would be: Watch out for the dark horses. Many of you have already declared your picks without considering other good robots who have quietly done well this year. Although prescouting is fun and possibly rewarding, continual scouting will be very important in Atlanta. How many teams have come up with plans to improve their robots? How many teams have less stellar robots than you predict because the toll of doing multiply regionals have taken a hit on the structural integrity of their robot? How many teams have strategized great defense maneuvers to compliment good offense? My second observation may be a sensitive bias because we are a second year team. But do not rule out teams that happen to have numbers above 2000. There always appears to be an underlying notion that only teams who have been around for several years will do well. You may be setting yourself up for a disappointment because you did not look at other teams strictly because of their assigned number. |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
Without rounding, Red's score was 126.71 and Blue's score was 127.901. If rounded to a multiple of 2, Blue would still win 128 to 126. |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
As far as second year teams, Exploding Bacon made it to Einstein last year. They were the "real deal". Experienced scouts give team number just a little more consideration than color of the robot when it comes to evaluating a team's capability. This thread is supposed to be entertaining and some of the entertainment comes from watching team members "position" themselves. Keep in mind, almost nobody will be referring to this thread when alliance selection time is near... |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
I have posted a paper in CD-Media with YouTube links to the video clips that I shot of the Elimination & other selected matches at the San Diego Regional. :yikes:
You can also find them by searching YouTube for “FIRST Robotics San Diego” or by team number, using the Chief Delphi standard to prefix it with “frc”. For example: “frc330”, “frc1717”, “frc980”, etc. Or just go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtflM11-z6k |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
I have posted a paper in CD-Media with a Blank Form for you to hang in your Pit and fill in by hand with your Match Schedule and Scores. Word format in color, 906 Kb. Enjoy. :cool:
Complements of Team 980 - ThunderBots - Galileo Division - World Championship 2008. |
Re: Galileo Division 2008
were leaving wednessday at 4 I just cant wait to go the action starts in 3 1/2 days
|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Same here!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi