![]() |
pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Pretty, but................... What keeps it from pulling apart vertically?
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
They had two of these mounted exactly as shown, but mirrored so that the inside rails could be connected via cross members. Then the outside rails were firmly mounted to the drive train frame and cross-braced at the top. It required exact spacing at the top and bottom to be smooth, and I will conjecture that the force that pushed/pulled it up had to be almost dead center as well. If you got to see their model up close, it was smooth as butter and very lightweight.
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
From the CAD, I can see how it is restrained in two dimensions, but not the third. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Any time anyone uploads a photo to CD Media it auto-tags the photo with 'frc###' (or 'ftc###') where ### is the Team Number in the profile of the uploader.
Try searching 'frc254' and 'frc968'. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
Please upload what you have. We are always trying to improve our lifts. I would love to see some that worked better than ours. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
The outside is a plain 1x2 that makes a U frame, with the bottom being solidly attached to the robot base, and the top the open portion. The top is held at the correct width by a spanner that goes across the two beams. You can see this in pictures of our robot--it's the piece the pulley/flag holder/spring mounts to. The bearings then mount as you see here, top and bottom. The inside is a rectangle made of channel on the left and right sides, and 1"x2" on the tops and bottoms. it rides inside the bearings, as shown. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
I think this is a "Picture paints a thousand words" situation. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
33 actually used some benchmarking off of 254 for our elevator this year. It was a really cool experiment in the importance of certain dimensional tolerances. While many dimension in this system can be reasonable, many have to be extremely precise. Too tight and the system will die a binding death. Too loose and it will beat itself to death.
Overall it was a very cool project, but tough on a mill without a digital readout. Definitely gave me additional respect for the POOFS craftsmanship. If you have never built an elevator it is definitely a good off season project to learn what is important. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
Cory, thanks for the pictures. They're a little fuzzy but they confirm what I finally realized. I'm glad that you mentioned you were using Teflon as a glide surface. In some situations it makes perfect sense, this being one of them. It is also much easier to manufacture a Teflon glide that fits properly then it is to manufacture a bearing mount without access to a decent mill. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Actually our glides (254) for 2007 where simply adhesive backed Teflon from McMaster, they where really easy to manufacture, we just cut them out with scissors. :)
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Tolerances...
The Poof frame is welded, heat-treated, and then powder coated. And yet when it all goes together the bearings rest perfectly on either side of tubing. Amazing? I think so... They probably took into acount how much the frame would expand and contract after each process to get it that perfect. Having welded an elevator myself this season, I fully appreciate that kind of craftsmanship. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
I am working on packing the entire 2008 robot cad, when I have the elevator done I'll post a .stp file for everyone.
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Cory,
What kind of bearings did you use for the lift, and where did you get them? |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Congrats Poofs, you guys probably have the smoothest forklift made in the past few years.
I like the colors, blue and black |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
thanks EJ and Cory for sharing. Pictures, CAD and explanations like these does wonders in inspiring others to either do something similar or kickstart other offshoots.
No wonder our machinist asked me to order a whole lot of channel aluminum. He's been taking "classes" in your pit area getting more ideas.;) |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
How big of an improvement was the switch to bearings over the teflon pads. It seems like it wouldn't make much of a difference for relatively light gamepieces and manipulators but for the trackball might have had a bigger effect.
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
We never had any problems with the teflon pads. Nor did we have any with the bearings. I'd say there was a little less play this year than last. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Thanks cory. Also how much play did you factor into the spacing for the teflon pads and the channel or did you have it exact?
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
This design isn't much different from your average forklift. The original design used last year was inspired by a walk-behind forklift that was at my previous place of work. If you look at one you will notice they are almost identical in both form and function, bearing placement and all.
The comment about heat-treating and precision tolerances should be noted. We did not heat treat any of the welded aluminum components of the frame or the elevator. Also, the precision and fit that we were able to attain was also due to the quantity of assemblies that were made. When making four complete sets for both teams, we started out with each set labeled as a part of a complete assembly. After welding, the assemblies no longer fit together as desired (somewhat expected). Luckily, we were able to mix and match sets and ended up with 2 sets that were super smooth (competition robots) and 2 sets that were acceptable (practice robots). With more than 5 pieces per robot, with 4 robots, the mixing and matching process took almost 4 hours one evening to get things to the way we wanted. Not as much preparation and precision as some give us credit for. We wish we were that good. ;) I also feel the need to mention that this elevator and the previous years robots are as much 968's babies as they are 254's. Students from both teams put a lot of time and energy (and heart) in designing and making such competitive robots, and it’s hard to see those efforts ignored. I think most people who know the specifics of the collaboration would agree that both teams contributed equally. Without certain aspects from each team, neither would be as competitive, engaging, or rewarding to the students as they are when they are working together. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Nicely put
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
I think it's actually alot easier than most people think to keep things square and precise while welding. The biggest success we had this year was the fact that we had a perfectly square and flat frame on the first try. Our student build team captain took a bit of time to consider everything that was needed before welding and came up with a plan for manufacturing the frame. We didn't start welding until I and (more importantly) the professional welder at our sponsor approved the plan.
When we welded our drive train frame together, we also brought in threaded rods that matched the axle holes and a bunch of nuts to fit the rod. We then spaced out the frame on the rods and welded the outer rails to the rear cross support. Then we used precisely-cut wooden blocks as spacers, and clamped the inner rail to the outer rail with the spacers in between. We measured diagonals as well as across the gaps before we welded, then after we spot-welded, then again after the final welds. Since the rods and spacers were firmly in place, the frame could not bend/warp. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
I've always looked at the 254 and 968 elevators and wondered how'd they do that. IMO it looks like the best way to do an elevator if you can machine the bearing blocks and if you can weld the aluminum. We used 80/20 the is year an it worked great for use but I noticed that the pads had a tendency to sag at full extension towards the end of the season. Also 80/20 is some heavy stuff (and that's putting it nicely:D ). Did you notice that the teflon pads wore down on your old elevators after a lot of use? I'd really like to experiment with an elevator like this and it seems like the teflon pads are a more feasible option for us.
Thanks a lot for discussing your designs here as well, I know 254 and 968 and even 60? when they were with 254 back in the day have inspired more robots then you'll ever be able to count. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Quote:
I think the key word here is "professional welder," I could best be described as a "professional n00b" seeing how all I weld are the team robots... ;) Thanks for the tips though. We'll keep that in mind if we ever do it again. |
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Were the bearings attached with simple bolts or shoulder bolt? If you just used plain bolts then it would be much cheaper.
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
Regular screws with nylon washers so the outer races could spin freely.
|
Re: pic: Linear bearing rails: the Cheesy RAWC way
I was hoping regular bolts was the answer. That will make things much simpler.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi