![]() |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Let's see if I can get this in under the radar...
As soon as our prototype frame was completed with all components assembled, I intentionally ran it 10 fps into the concrete wall of the high school with no bumpers. Other than a ding on the outer aluminum frame at the impact points, everything was ok. Then for the production frame, we rearranged some of the 1" aluminum extrusion to allow for an open front. Again, the same quality assurance test was completed, but this time at 12fps and testing was only done on frontal impacts. The result was a small dent in the front exposed tubing, but nothing severe like we had our first year. During front impacts of the competition season, these aluminum bars became more and more crushed, which leads me to believe they served as a crush zone that made up for the lack of bumpers. In hindsight I'm glad we had them because that meant there was less shock force delivered to the rest of the components. While I don't condone running full speed at a wall to test your frame, I definitely think quality assurance tests are quite helpful. Plus they make for great videos... |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Quote:
We usually use welded aluminum for our base frame. Using steel as a base frame would be too heavy--maybe small pieces to strengthen joints that aren't being welded. |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Any link to the ultrasteel???
|
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Quote:
We had always wanted to use a locally-manufactured product on our robot to further gain community interest in our program and FIRST. A parent of one of our students works at Dietrich in Warren, OH and helped us aquire a supply of framing members. |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
When it come to frames, your number one enemy is impulse (force x time). Even you most violent collision inside of first cam be modeled by
F = (2*(M*∆V))/t + M So when design a frame you need to consider ways to maximize the time over which the impulse occurs. This reduces the force applied and thus the stress in the element. Bumper are just one method to reduce the total force acting on a frame. Rubber Cushioned Pillow Block are another. I recommend using iso clipping inside of your cad package to check to see the effect that impulse has on your frame. |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Quote:
|
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Does anyone have pics of their super cool frames???
|
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
|
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Going into the season this year we had a very pretty frame... but now that the season is over its not so pretty. We used 1/16 wall 1x1 tube for our frame. It held up pretty good for us all year. the bottom rails aren't so pretty anymore from robot arms and appendages getting under the bumpers and hitting the frame, also the bumpers were just high enough so if we accidentally hit the dividing wall in hybrid or teleop the bottom supports for the overpass would get under there and beat our frame up pretty bad... Ill have to see if i can get some pics of it tomorrow?!
|
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Quote:
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7225/1003436io0.jpg It's four motor (3 CIM, one Globe), 4WD drive (two custom omni, two Colsons). It's designed to allow our robot to drive right up against a wall, then drop the rPOD to scoot sideways into it, in order to position ourselves perfectly for our "unique" trackball strategy. ;) |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
our robot's gyro freaked on us, and pushed a 250+ pound table that was not meant to move. It took two adults to just push it back!:yikes: ... and the other day at the 4-H fair, we built a robot that you can ride on. the only kill switch that worked was on the actual bot itself (in the form of a breaker, the switch on the remote would only make it lose the signal.) We were unpacking our trailor, and i was using the bot to haul around crates (approximately a 100 lb. load ) when the gyro also freaked on us. It ended up taking out 2 and a half boothes. Luckily no one was there due to the fact that it was before the fair started.
I know you are thinking about why the kill switch on the remote did not work. it was because we were using a vex Robot Controller so it was never meant to operate on such a big scale. |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Quote:
|
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Quote:
http://photos.project1726.org/thumbnails.php?album=28 |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
Team 467 Unibody Chassis. Although it has no real frame the unibody grants us an extremely light-weight and durable body.
Pics: Construction: http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=511138 http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=511236 Chassis with Skin attached: http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=512219 http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=512201 http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=512177 Final Product: http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=512353 http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=512356 http://www.team467.org/gallery/main...._itemId=512365 |
Re: Is your frame tough enough for FIRST?
we call this the "Magic Carpet"
we built it in 3 days at the 4H fair using a vex controller. It was the one that took out the boothes. (it had heavy tubs on it at the time) http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/c...picture048.jpg And this is our 2008 robot. it was the one that pushed over the heavy table. http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/c...8c5211e3fe.jpg |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi