![]() |
pic: IRI Prank #1
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
I hate to ask, but what is it?
thanks, Vivek |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
You know you've been involved with robotics too long when you see a remote-controlled traffic barrel coming up behind people and honking - and it doens't faze you.
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
I heard 1114 had their robot saran wrapped during the alliance selections. Never saw a picture though.
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Whenever they need a steady supply of traffic barrels, they're welcome to come to Grosse Pointe and take all of ours =]
But why Saran wrap it to a bench? Of all the other things that it could be wrapped to (Andy Baker (;) ), a trackball, etc), you had to choose a bench. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
It also made it really easy to carry it to 1024's pit when we were finished. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
I wondered why it was stuck to a bench. That thing hit me coming back from a match:eek:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Not funny. -John |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
I'm glad someone wrapped up that cone, it was funny for about the first ten minutes and then I was just annoyed the rest of the weekend by it.
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Saturday was just amateur hour IMHO. The difference between the Thursday night pranking & the Saturday pranking was that members of 1114 were in on the prank (aka: bot-napping) on Thursday, & obviously were asked before hand. Pranking is funny but only to a limit of course. The cone prank (which I didn't see but would have liked to in person) was just great! There's a HUGE difference in pranking a side project & a competitive robot while at an event as well. That's just funny right there what they did to the cone-bot. lol |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
If you ask me, the prank done on Thursday night could have broken more things then the whole saran wrap. But thats just me. Regardless, both weren't funny IMHO. The whole barrel thing though, everyone was annoyed by it so that's cool, since ya know, it wasn't a REAL robot.
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
I agree messing with a competition robot isn't exactly funny, especially if something gets messed up...I personally wasn't involved in it, I actually didn't even know it happened until after it was done and never saw it up close only from across the gym (our pit, against the far wall). But I still would like to see pictures, although whoever has them probably shouldn't post them here because the reaction will not be favorable.
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Could someone provide details of the Thursday night "professional" prank?
Makes me recall the time Steve Warren stuck a note on our crate at GTR on Thursday morning before we arrived. It instructed us not to open it and see "Customs" instead. Except we WEREN'T in on the prank. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Anyways, we took the robot out of the arena and took it back to where I was staying (The robot was in the car the whole time and it was supported by many things that will prevent it from breaking, also I was driving very slow). Team 1114's kids were with me the whole time. Around 8 at night, they wanted to go back to the hotel and I didn't feel comfortable keeping the robot in the car the whole night so I took the kids back to the hotel and stored the robot in the meeting room in the hotel that 1114 was staying at. We took pictures of the robot standing in front of the podium giving "lectures" to 1114's kid and so forth. That same night, I went to hang out with team 1114 at their hotel. Karthik had no idea that the robot was downstairs locked in a room. Next morning, the robot was back in the arena safe and sound. Unfortunately, the prank wasn't successful since Karthik found out that same night. The teacher brought the robot back to the arena. It's not a good thing to mess with someone else's property without getting their permission; but I believe it's okay when permission is taken as well as the people who it belongs to are involved as well. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
The person who performed the prank had confessed to the IRI organizers on Saturday night and promised to apologize to 1114. I do not know who they were or if they have already apologized or not.
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Yes there were no angry thoughts of flogging toucan-haired mentors that day, as we knew the crate hadn't been opened. I could imagine a different feeling if someone had messed with our bot without our knowledge, though. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Wow... I'm amazed at how much exposure Albert the Road Barrel got...
Sorry we didn't have his fully autonomous mode done in time for IRI... eventually he's getting an array of eight or more ultrasonic sensors around his base... plan is to either give him a route to follow and just stop if somebody comes up to him (using our 2008 robot's championship-rockwell-automation-innovation-in-control-award-winning autonomous navigation software... had to throw that last part in there :rolleyes:), or just have him run away from people. :] Quote:
...and yes, I thought it was hillarious when Albert showed up on a bench. I didn't really think the LED display getting saran wrapped was too funny though... it had a pretty penny worth of parts in it... Quote:
As far as I know, I think I'm clean at least... I don't remember hitting anyone. :o Quote:
-q |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Talent Show, Q, Talent Show. Albert could assist the master of ceremonies. :) or...Fishboy and Albert the Road Barrel, Taking It On The Road.... Or.... Albert, The Latte Barrel. Or ... if only Albert Had A Hammer ok, I'll stop. Well, writing but not thinking. I can't believe I missed seeing this little guy. *sigh* |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
I hope it doesn't come to this, but maybe the IRI needs a "Do not touch another teams robot" policy. there are lots of ways to have fun and play pranks - i don't think this is a good one. ps - i would say this about any teams robot, regardless if they were in the #1 or #72 spot. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
I am going to have to agree with Chris (and others), the only time you should do anything with another teams robot is if they've asked you to help work on it. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Maybe this whole idea was just out of control and not thought out enough. I am embarrassed for leading this whole thing on Thursday night. I didn't have enough people or time to think of a good prank for IRI this year like last one.
I can't take back what I did. With that said, I apologize to everyone on Team 1114 and to the IRI planning committee. I didn't mean this to come out this way or mean any harm to anyone. No such action will be taken in future that will involve me. Team 1114, I idolize you guys as a team and I hope this action of mine doesn't affect my relationship with your team in future. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
It's all good Arefin.
I'll get on writing up a release form that teams that get pranked can sign next year so the folks who like to lawyer situations will all be happy before we have any fun again at the expense of another team. :rolleyes: Obviously I'm being sarcastic here, & laying it on thick. Imagine if any candid camera, or situational television show ever aired on tv with humor in mind had the people getting pranked sign a waiver BEFORE they got pranked?? Or what if you were told before hand you were going to be given a surprise party? Takes some of the fun out of it now doesn't it? Seriously folks. There is a time & a place & a way to go about pranking someone or a team in the FIRST community, or even outside of it. Yes, I'll agree things have the potential of getting damaged if a prank is approached the wrong way (as I've had the misfortune to experience first hand actually - but I'm no more of an opponent of pranking after that, just more of a propponent of pranking in a non-destructive way), but sometimes people just need to lighten up & have some fun (in a safe way). FIRST teaches us to be safe. It's in the core values. It also teaches us to have fun with all we do, & be innovative, & also creative. With that in mind, if a person decides to pull a prank, you hope that they will approach it in a safe way & they will always, in my mind, be fully responsible for anything that went wrong, which Im sure in ALL these pranks we are talking about the prankster(s) would agree. And in turn, one good prank usually deserves an equal prank against the original prankster, so if anyone wants to help me plastic wrap Arefin's car, or do something else, let me know. Oh, & btw, don't mention it to him. Shhhh!! Wait a second... DARN IT! He's going to read this & know I'm up to something. :ahh: Oh wells, may as well get my waiver ready for him to sign. :rolleyes: |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Just to add a thought to the discussion of taking another team's robot or doing things to it like wrapping it in saran wrap.
Many teams have valuable sponsors that they depend on for monies, support, partnership. If something were to happen to a robot because of a prank, how could that be explained to the sponsor and who would do the explaining? The discussions regarding sponsor support, outreach, spreading the word of FIRST and impacting communities locally and globally are real. Reputation is something all FIRST teams work to establish inside and outside the FIRST community. It doesn't take much to weaken a reputation that has been built over time. This is another perspective to look at when making choices and decisions regarding how you conduct yourself as an individual and as a team. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
If an accident happens, and you damage our robot... how exactly would you be responsible? Would you pay for it? How would we determine cost for such a thing? Why should I trust that you won't do something stupid which results in a bad situation? How can you be sure there won't be some horrible accident? If you break something, should I just lighten up? Do you expect me to be happy that you derived pleasure at my team's expense? It is all about risk. If everything goes fine, great... we laugh at ourselves and everything is cool. If something goes wrong, then what? Why is it worth the risk? Why should YOU get to decide whether it is worth the risk or not. Why would I ever sign your hypothetical waiver to allow you to mess with me or my team or my robot? Let me be very clear: Stay the heck away from 148. I don't trust your judgment. I wonder if there are other teams who don't trust your judgment. I wonder if you've ever given that any thought. Then again you ARE a professional pranker, right? -John PS - Greg Ross once said "Playing a practical joke means doing something mean and calling it funny." |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
On the subject of pranks…
Good pranks are clever, inventive, humorous and inspiring in a sense; but they are also a little sadistic and very dependent on the participant’s and observer’s perspectives. I think good pranks can spark our imaginations but they also evoke strong emotional responses in the target of the prank (be it fear, embarrassment, anger). Bad pranks (and jokes) damage relationships, reputations and is the source of numerous lawsuits in the workplace. Pranks and jokes typically exist in that murky gray region between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. It is hard to know when you’ve gone over the boundary since you are typically playing very close to it. I tend to think there is an associated “adrenalin rush” with behaving within this boundary of acceptable behavior which makes it appealing to the prankster. While I admire a good prank, I am often more intrigued by how the prank’s target behaves. Some get angry and/or threaten revenge; others show great generosity of spirit by playing along even though their internal emotions may be roiled. Those folks that fall into that last category are the ones I really admire. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Bad Prank: Saran Wrapping 1114.
Good Prank: Karthik Matress Taco. Just sayin. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Wow.
The way I'm looking at it right now is that Arefin's prank was not theft. The other one, by the sound of it, was. Can you add getting police officers to patrol the event to your list of things to do for IRI next year? Maybe we will need some snipers on the roofs too to make sure everyone is always in order. WAIT maybe thats taking it too far? We're all involved with robotics, maybe we should just make a meter to measure how a team's sense of humor is? ... I understand some of the outrage about this pranking controversy but really everybody is over reacting unless some damage was caused. If Karthik and 1114 can post on here and say what happened to their robot and what damaged what maybe people will calm down without a magic "chill pill" and shrug or laugh this off. Pavan. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Here's the deal on the pranks. On Thursday, Arefin and crew, along with some 1114 students/mentors decided to hide our robot. When I first heard about this prank, I was pretty annoyed. But after learning the details, and knowing that our students and lead teacher helped transport the robot, I was okay with it. My primary concern was the safety of the robot, and knowing that the proper precautions were taken made eased my concerns. Do I think it was an ill-advised stunt? Yes. Am I angry/annoyed about it in the slightest? Not at all. (Arefin, no need to keep apologizing, we're cool with it.) The other thing about this prank, was that Arefin has been friends with 1114 for a while. It's not like some stranger came and stole our robot. The second prank on Saturday was a different story. I don't want to go into all the details, since the perpetrator has yet to speak to us about it, but basically someone who our team was not familiar with decided to saran wrap our robot before the elimination rounds. We were not happy with this prank at all, for a couple of reasons. It was performed by someone not associated with our team in the slightest. When I pull pranks, I pull them on my friends, not complete strangers. For example, if I were to saran wrap Paul Copioli while he was sleeping, it'd be funny, we'd both laugh, the world would go on. If I were to saran wrap a 6'2", 200 lb stranger in his sleep, he'd probably punch me in the face and break about 83 bones. This would be deserved. The second reason this prank was a bad idea, is because the prankster had no idea what damage could have been done, to the robot or himself. Every FRC robot is delicate in it's own way. For example, say our ram was loaded? The prankster could have easily released it thereby sending our ram flying into their face. This would be what I call a "less than good situation". Quote:
Anyways, the lead mentor for team of the student who performed this prank called me on Sunday and apologized profusely. We're more than over the situation (although a few of us were pretty annoyed in the moment), and are pretty surprised that this became an issue here on CD. Hopefully we can all turn this situation into a positive lesson about "good ideas" and "bad ideas". Or to put it more succinctly "think before you act". Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
1114's radio cable came out in SF 1-1. Their arm pot was screwy all afternoon in the elims. Who's to say that it wasn't because random people were messing around with their robot? It's like they teach you in kindergarten (or maybe even preschool. It was a long time ago :p) keep your hands to yourself. Even if they didn't cause damage, that doesn't negate the fact they were messing with another team's robot. If this happened to my team, and my kids "arranged" for such a prank to take place, I can tell you I would not be happy at all. Both the responsible parties, and my students would have a lot of explaining to do. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
The thing is that the 'professionals' had permission from some members of 1114. NOT only students but apparently a teacher was in on it too. When a student's voice of reason fails, it is up to the adult to make the proper decisions and make a stand when they are the head of a group, organization, etc. Pavan |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
A thought on the first prank. (the second was out of line end of story) Depending on who owns the robot this could of been a major problem. If a group (other than 1114) were to have ownership of the robot then this could turn into a case of theft. Realize, these are expensive pieces of equipment. Some companies put thousands of dollars towards their teams, most of this with the thought of being rewarded w/ positive PR and some nice advertising. If a prank were to inadvertently damage the robot or the robot came up missing (say a company exec wanted a photo op) I imagine the company would be pretty angry. If the robot is not performing at it's peak the company is not getting all of what it paid for. This could lose sponsorships for teams. I say this as a caution only.
Ok, pretty bleak and negative. The sad part, I like practical jokes. But NOT on competition robots. Mike, this was pretty funny, and since it was not on a competing robot I think it was acceptable. That being said, if it competes and it doesnt belong to you or your team, keep your hands off it. Treat it like anything else that belongs to others. For example, if one of my friends stole my computer and hid it from me the night before I had a paper due said friends may be going to class with a black eye or two the next day. Prank with caution and respect. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Ok, so here is the deal, STOP TALKING ABOUT 1114 FROM THIS POINT ON!!! I have come on here by request to clear this up as it was ME who wrapped both the cone and the robot. I mean for crying out loud if I would have known it would have created this much controversy, I wouldn't have done it. I had bought the wrap to continue a new tradition started last year think it would be cool if the team pranked choose a target for the next years prank and continue on a tradition. I did not know who it was going to be, but someone who I will not mention the name suggested 1114. So durring aliance selections we went to the pits and their robot just happened to be sitting on the cart in the pit room. I did not move their robot ever, I just happened to be lucky that it wasn't in their pit. I with the help of others then began to wrap it, but we were very careful to wrap it loosley and with as little bit of touching it as possible. Now the very day after I talked to both 1114 and the iri planning committee, so both know. Yes I could have made a better choice, but for crying out loud people, it was just a joke. Also mike I did enjoy helping you with this.
So, from this point on, this thread is about the co e and nothing about 1114, and if you are having diffulty with this, you can pm me instead of posting for the person you are bashing for doing this is in fact me, so from now on say anything to my face (or as close to my face as pming can get). |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Ben |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
This is like what Karthik was saying, its okay if you do it to PEOPLE YOU KNOW, but don't mess with others especially those who don't know you. I got hit by the thing a few times, and when I was trying to work on the robot it wouldn't get away from me. Please play the GP card if you want- I hate that term anyways - but I was about to push the off button regardless of Chris' "keep your hands off other robots" rule due to it being a distraction and getting in the way of my IRI experience. Also for every one person that you messed with I bet there were two others or three others who saw it and didn't appreciate it on the victim's behalf. If Chris does decide to make the no touching robots rule, I think he should make a rule regarding getting permits for show robots and robots touching/disrupting people. EDIT: Somebody said that they are not responsible for the actions of the others on their but but in reality they are just as guilty for not stopping their own teammates so please do not pull that "its not my fault, I didn't do it" card. Pavan Dave . |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
I'm sorry if I sound ungracious, but some things need to be told plain and simple. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
On the topic of driving him on a road...VIDEO PLEASE, but that does seem slightly dangerous, and I'm sure there's probably some crazy law against it. Now I want one. :D |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Pavan Dave . |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Of course it's a real robot, but it wasn't a competition robot. If it had been broken by the wrapping, nothing would have come of it except taking it back to the shop on Monday and fixing it. If messing with a competition robot breaks it, it could put the team out of the game.
I was on the field so I didn't get the full effect of the roving barrel. I do remember thinking once or twice, "There's that horn again, it's kinda annoying." If it had been going off a lot in the pit area and commons, "kinda" would have escalated to "extremely". It's a cute idea that has its uses. Sounds like some people thought it was taken too far. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Poor Albert seems to be getting bashed as well as saran wrapped.
I'd hate to see such a fun idea go down the tubes. Could 2 Alberts be sectioned off in an area of unused hallway (or outside) and have races as a fundraiser? People who want to race pay a small fee to do so? Monies go to charity? Children of all ages have a blast? Just a thought. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Out of curiosity, did anyone once ever ask the people driving it if they could avoid an area, or if it was really becoming as much of a problem as what you say (I'll take your word for it), did you ever consider to ask them to turn it off for a while?
It's one thing to completely bash it after the fact, but if it was becoming such a problem in all of your eye's, then why did no one do anything about it? You can't expect a situation to get better if you don't make an attempt to confront it. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
And then the orginal 4 all walk away (sheepishly) because someone finally "stepped up" & took care of the problem, while the girl who shut it off just smiles. Then there is some kind of tag line about taking action to solve a problem, & not just talking about it or something. I know that's a little off tangent, but when I read your reply, I thought of that & thought it was relative. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Richard, I know you are making a tongue-in-cheek remark, btw. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
How long would it take to have 450 units ready to ship and how much per unit? Albert could be the next best thing to work zone safety since the arrow board. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
Ben |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
|
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
-- In bullriding, the rodeo clowns use barrels (not cones/traffic barrels) for protection and distraction. I've seen some amazing work and have a very high regard/respect for those clowns. They know what they are doing. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Quote:
On topic (somewhat): I'm inclined to agree with the definition of prank earlier in the thread. I was pranked today at work (it's a fun-loving place) by one of the other workers. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
Oh this poor traffic barrel...
It was a really clever idea to have something like this driving around. We had the idea of making a grill drive around for our town's 4th of July parade., but... it just never happened. However, I think it hung around in the most congested spot in the entire building: the pit entrance, a bit too much. I saw it run into many people and the honking... oh the honking... It was the perfect robot to pick up and run away with. It wasn't a competition robot, it was sturdy, members of 1024 were good sports about it, and everyone else who saw the poor robot wrapped to the bench highly approved. However, in hindsight, it probably wasn't a good idea to carry the bench to 1024's pit as that was near a high traffic area, as well... |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
I agree that the cone was a great idea and would be great for PR. (and i am bummed that we didnt think of it first. koodos to you team 1024) though this is a great idea, i agree with InfernoX14 and probably many others when i say that it hung around too much in a crowded, congested spot and became overly annoying as the weekend went on. Also, I spent most of my time in the pits and every time it honked, even if it was on the other end of the pits, it startled me.
other than how annoying it got, it really was a good idea and i hope that 1024 doesn't discontinue Albert and i hope to see it at IRI next year (if we are invited again) i just ask you guys give the horn a little break. |
Re: pic: IRI Prank #1
As one of the creators of Albert the robotic safety barrel i would like to apologize to anybody that was offended by him at IRI. It was not the not our intention to annoy anybody. It was just a little summer project that a couple of us from team 1024 decided to build. I was not able to be there all the time while albert was being driven around, so I was unaware of the problems he created and nerves that he tested until i read about it here on CD. I completely understand how his being in the commons and in the hallway to the fieldhouse would be distracting and problematic. I hope that i dont have to remove albert completely from FIRST events but tweaking the horn and how and where he is driven will certainly be taken into consideration for any future events. Sorry again for any problems he caused over the IRI weekend.
Ben |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi