![]() |
Ftc Kick off 2008
FTC Kickoff Information
Greetings teams! It's that time of year again, when the FTC community starts buzzing about the new game. The FIRST Tech Challenge 2008 Season Kickoff will take place on Saturday, September 13, 2008 @ 5 pm EST. Some areas will be hosting live kickoff events, while others will be celebrating with their teams and supporters. Please contact your local Affiliate Partner for kickoff information. New Award Announced! One of the exciting changes to FTC this season is the addition of the Design Award. Teams will be allowed to use aluminum and polycarbonate sheet to design and fabricate elements for their robots. The Design Award will be given to teams who come up with creative ways to use this material in functional and aesthetic ways. This allows team to incorporate elements of industrial design into their bots. We can’t wait to see what you come up with! this is from http://usfirst.org/community/ftc/content.aspx?id=10302 Lets go ftc teams |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
This suddenly has me getting much more interested in FTC, but I'm curious how it will affect teams that run out of "the physics lab" rather than the shop class.
One of the great things about FTC (and now VEX) is that you could build a robot on the kitchen table that could go head to head with one built in a machine shop. (Okay, you might have to scoot out the back yard and use a hack saw and file every now and then, but you didn't need more than about $10.00 worth of hand tools to compete on an even keel with everyone.) While I await seeing what the limitations on the use of polycarbonate and aluminum sheet are (if any), I can certainly see how teams with access to shears, box and pan brakes, drill presses, english wheels, vaccuum formers, water jet cutters, TIG welders, etc. would have significant opportunities to advance their design over their less well-equipped competitors/colleagues. Given that we make our FTC bots in the same shops we make our FRC bot, this design flexibilty offers some definite advantages to my students... but I wonder if we might loose some of the teams running out of the Physics labs and home schools. (My "completely unbiased" answer is those kids need to take some shop classes anyways, but I know they aren't always available...) Another factor is that having specifically crafted components will reduce the design flexibility of the robot... with generic parts it was always possible to pull a robot apart and re-build or replace a component in fairly short order. With custom-built parts, you have a much greater committment to your design whether it is working well or not... mid-competition upgrades are far more difficult. Sure it happens in FRC all the time... but over a much longer period of time. On the other hand, I always rather disliked seeing students buy something that they could build. I also wonder whether this was an intentionally planned addition to the rule book or an afterthought to compensate for a lack of available parts... it will be interesting to see what, exactly, the rules say. In any case it should allow for some creative applications of the sheet metal functions of 3D cadd programs... and some pretty cool looking robots. As far as I am concerned this is even a more interesting and signficant announcement than the change in the controller. Software types may choose to disagree on that, but breaking away from 100% off-the-shelf components is undeniably a significant change. Jason |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Our FTC teams will gladly bring extra polycarb and aluminum to events for teams who wish to try new things or need replacements.
Any details in regards to what type of polycarb and aluminum we can use? Specifications? |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
I wasn't able to find any specs, but I suspect all will be revealed on Saturday. Trust FIRST to drop a little tid-bit of info to build the excitement... they excel at that! Jason |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
I would like to applaud DTE's comments; and add even more emphasis to the ones that express concerns about the potential problems that can take root in an FTC competition that opens the "custom parts" door too far.
Here are the sentiments I expressed in a similar on line conversation a while ago (back when Vex Kits were being used): Quote:
Blake |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
My questions/concern, is that these metal/polycarbonate are for robot aesthetics, which is basically looks, so will these parts be able to come "out" of the footprint? Which is interesting.
AND YEAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Team 1261 has been psyched and prepared for 2009 season since we got eliminated from the GA tournament's semi finals. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
To me, that says the parts may be used in ways that improve the robots' game-playing. That is far different from "basically looks". Blake |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
When comparing this to FRC, look at all the teams that build a simple reliable machine and do well year after year. Then look at the teams with money that over complicate and do poorly each year. Same thing will happen with FTC. Teams will waste time designing and building complicated metal/poly assemblies, while the teams that build simple and strong will cruise on by come competition.
I am excited about the expanded use of raw materials in FTC and hope FIRST lets us weld the aluminum. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
My team 478 for ftc is thinking about doing FTC this year. We are already signed up for IFI or the vex competition. This year. Were thinking about the ftc competition because this year is only 450 dollars for last year teams to buy the new kit and we need to learn the kit.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Something tells me the sheet aluminum/polycarb is a solution to the expensive structural components provided by Tetrix. You'll still need some Tetrix to provide the structure, but sheet aluminum is great for the small stuff.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
If this is truly going to be an un-restricted use of aluminum and polycarbonate, why would teams even bother with the tetrix stuff?
Since weight has never been a consideration for FTC you could just cut your whole chassis out of a single flat plate of aluminum. and then make all custom mounting brackets that are ideal for your application. There have already been reports of the aluminum gears skipping teeth based on bad center to center distances, this problem could be totally avoided, now that teams could make their own custom gearboxes for FTC. The possibilities are nearly endless and that's where I see a problem with this. Just like many other people in this thread I think that FTC should have stayed the "whats in the kit only." While it is true that some teams would always have an advantage over others, it was from a cost perspective (which accessories you could afford). Now it is a matter of machining and tools in addition to the cost of accessories. At the same time that I think this could be a step backwards for FTC it makes sense that we should wait to see what the limitations are placed on using these components before we jump to conclusions. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
I would be ok with the addition of simple pieces of Al or Poly sheeting (not stock). I think they would need to limit the machining to simple tools and no welding. One of the great things about FTC in the past was the "kit only" rule and being able to build a successful robot with nothing but the kit and a Dremel. I would hate to see this turn into just a small version of FRC.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
we hope there is not open machining and things like welding allowed. our school can't afford to do FRC and we don't have the machine shop access to fabricate or make our own parts out of stock metal, which is why we are hoping to do either vex or ftc this year. We already got our vex classroom kit, which the students love so far, and are thinking of ordering a ftc kit if there is an event in this area and we like the game. I guess we'll know tomorrow. But I do hope it's just the parts we get and no major modifying or machining allowed, that's one of the main reasons we want to do ftc and vex.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
But my students want to do ftc and vex so they are on a pretty even playing field with the other teams and can build all their robots in our classroom - if some schools are able to weld and machine parts for ftc, then we can't make and use many parts they will be able to. To say "just build a simple robot" is missing the point. We don't want to build a simple robot, we want to challenge ourselves with the parts available, we just don't have the resources to machine or weld parts. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
If you actually really want to do this then seek help from machine shops or your local highschool that might have a machine shop. Just go out there and make it happen. Finding machining resources is actually easier than finding people willing to sponsor teams. You can even open your yellow pages and search for "Machining" and I guarantee you will find something. Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Woah!!!
Heated conversation. I must say, FTC is simple, and not havving the ability to weld and machine in major ways is what makes FTC amazing. An even playing field in more ways than you would know. And if you look at the FTC mission statement, " The ultimate goal of FTC is to reach more young people with a lower-cost, more accessible opportunity to discover the excitement and rewards of science, technology, and engineering.". I know for a fact that our machine shop has over $10,000 worth of saws, tools, and other things. and that's NOT including any welding equipment. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
However, I loved the FTC program for an entirely different reason. I loved it because with the exception of funding to buy parts, there really wasn't a huge resource gap between the have and have-nots. Team YYY had a full machine available and you didn't? No big deal, if anything the only advantage they gained was a few minutes time shearing/bandsawing rather than hacksawing. This fact made FTC the FIRST program that could be in every school in my opinion. The way our nation is, a FRC team simply can't happen in every high school, but a FTC team easily can. By changing up FTC so much, I think a lot of teams will be alienated. Yes, the teams that were building in classrooms and living rooms still can compete and probably be competitive, but it simply won't be the same. I think it stems back to the FIRST Board of Directors being out of teach with what being on a team is really like. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Anyone know when we'll be able to buy extra parts?
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Does anyone know if the FTC kickoff will be webcast, and if so where can i find the link?
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
There is no "official" thing. Like FRC. There's generally game animations and stuff. so not webcast.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
here's a hint. the video is puled down though. Thanks Unlimited.
http://ftcunlimited.blogspot.com/200...-face-off.html I was going to go to the kick off, but I forgot to set my alarm clock.. oops |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Crap, who pulled the video?
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
The local sites (or whatever FIRST calls them) get everything including the field in advance. I guess one of the sites decided to open there doors early.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
I don't get why some areas get the game early and others have to wait?
Anyway, I was a little disappointed. The game doesn't look very hard, but that does not look like a cheap or easy field to build. I really don't like the autonomous start. How do they decide which robot gets to start on the field? I'm sure we will always want to. Maybe I'll like it more after we review it some, but for now, I think past games were better. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Please someone describe the game for us!
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
I agree with smartkid, how about a little description, or waiting until the game is announced to all of us before you guys start talking about the game on here please.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Clicking the red box at the bottom of the blog reveals the front page of the game manual, with a brief overview. Looks legit but could be a really good imitation.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
This is either the funniest prank ever or someone's in trouble.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Relax -- it looks legit.
Some regions had events where they were showing the game animation, field, and game pieces today. This is clearly a picture of a flyer from one of those events. I guess they took down the video as a courtesy -- that, or FIRST threatened to taunt them a second time, or some such. Regardless, FTC doesn't have quite the time constraints that FRC does, so I personally wouldn't get too worked up about this being a prank, nor about some teams getting to see the game early, whether via an event or a leak. A day or two in FTC just isn't a big deal. I personally have very little faith that things will actually be posted by 5:00pm, so I don't really plan to start downloading and reading until tomorrow morning anyway. After which I look forward to a rewarding season of higher prices for field and robot parts, less variety of mechanisms, and more questionable maturity of wireless control platforms as compared to last year. Not that I'm pessimistic. :-) |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Wow, talk about timing, I must say good job to FTC for this one. I logged at 5 PM exactly, and bam, the game was there. :D.
And i enjoyed. :D. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Check out the robot requirements in Section 4. Seems like...there are some issues with the file, or something wrong with pdf reader.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Why what's wrong?
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
![]() I see this in that section. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
http://www.team.prhsrobotics.com/gal...?g2_itemId=912
I believe that is the missing section. Correct me if I'm wrong. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Are you using an Apple computer? I have the same problem when viewing the document with Apple Preview. This problem does not appear when viewed with Adobe Acrobat on my Apple.
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Earlier in this thread there was discussion over the new award for design using the Aluminum and Plexiglas components and the effect that would have on "table top" teams that don't have access to workshops.
Now that we've seen the rules, I have to say that it seems that the restriction on bonding... no welding, glues, or anything from outside the kit... places some limits on how much of an advantage the teams with shop access have. Much of what you can do with these materials under these conditions is not outside the grasp of a patient "table top" team with an eye for detail.... and a lot of time with a hacksaw blade, vise, hand drill and some fine files. Kudos to the FTC GDC for allowing a little bit of shop work without upsetting the balance too far in favour of the shops. Jason |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
In general, I am very excited about the unique challenges in the game this year. Robustness is going to be a much bigger factor than it has in previous years. |
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
Quote:
|
Re: Ftc Kick off 2008
My initial reaction of the game is that it is kind of disappointing in the large quantity of ways to score - while it does make the game interesting, I feel that it over-complicates the game. I generally prefer games that are easy to score at a glance - take last year's Vex game, 1 point for normal balls in the goal, 5 points for bonus balls, 10 point autonomous bonus, that's it. I was also hoping that with the addition of multiple surfaces, that they would play more of a role in the scoring/gameplay.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:25. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi